Re: [BUG] hw/xen: features published after InitWait since 240cc11369fc

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 03:56:22PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sept 2026 at 15:39, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> > I wasn't *actually* setting out to comment on the AI policy today  — in
> > fact I didn't really have a strong opinion on it. I spend enough of my
> > life tilting at windmills *intentionally*; this wasn't meant to be one
> > of them.

snip

> Yes. I view that email as pretty strong data for 'even a policy
> shift which says "we're OK with accepting some kinds of AI
> generated code" should still be pretty strong on "text intended
> for humans to read (docs, commit messages, mailing list posts, etc)
> should be written by humans"'. I think that review commentary on
> Paolo's RFC about a less strict policy tended to be in that direction,
> so I don't think I'm completely out on a limb here.

The latest proposed policy explicitly forbids sending AI text
to people:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-09/msg00260.html

[quote]
### No AI-written text must reach maintainers

These rules apply when publishing AI-assisted work to GitLab or the mailing 
list:

- **AI-written cover letters and commit messages are banned**.  These are
  easy to recognize and waste reviewers' time.
- **AI-generated responses to reviewer comments are banned**. This undermines
  the human-to-human interaction fundamental to code review.
- **AI-written issue ("work item") descriptions or comments are banned**. These
  are verbose and waste triagers' time.
[/quote]

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com       ~~        https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org          ~~          https://entangle-photo.org :|
|: https://pixelfed.art/berrange   ~~    https://fstop138.berrange.com :|