From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Shivansh Dhiman <shivansh.dhiman@amd.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed()
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 10:26:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arau02kKKLWDOFcE@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721052113.18B251F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2026, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > index 8d1967f5c099f..9b1afa47c54c9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> > @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> >
> > if (unlikely(new_vmcb12 || vmcb12_is_dirty(control, VMCB_DR))) {
> > vmcb02->save.dr7 = svm->nested.save.dr7 | DR7_FIXED_1;
> > - svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 = svm->nested.save.dr6 | DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
> > + svm->vcpu.arch.dr6 = svm->nested.save.dr6 | kvm_dr6_fixed(vcpu);
>
> [Severity: High]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but kvm_deliver_exception_payload()
> in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c has the exact same flaw with DR6_ACTIVE_LOW.
>
> Could it be fixed using the newly exported kvm_dr6_fixed() helper?
>
> Currently, kvm_deliver_exception_payload() executes:
>
> case DB_VECTOR:
> ...
> vcpu->arch.dr6 |= DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
> vcpu->arch.dr6 |= ex->payload;
> vcpu->arch.dr6 ^= ex->payload & DR6_ACTIVE_LOW;
>
> This unconditionally forces all active-low bits to 1 before applying the
> current exception payload, destroying any previously accumulated 0 bits.
>
> If a guest OS relies on the Bus Lock Detect #DB to mitigate DoS attacks,
> and another #DB event (like a Single Step) occurs before the guest clears
> DR6, kvm_deliver_exception_payload() will force DR6 bit 11 back to 1.
>
> Because the new #DB payload does not have the bus lock bit set, the
> subsequent XOR leaves bit 11 as 1.
>
> Does this destroy the accumulated event and allow a malicious task to evade
> detection?
>
> Could this be updated to use kvm_dr6_fixed(vcpu) instead of DR6_ACTIVE_LOW
> to avoid clearing previously accumulated active-low DR6 events?
No, the whole thing needs to be rewritten. The issue isn't active-low vs. fixed-1,
it's that the semantics of each bit are feature specific, i.e. don't correlate with
active-high vs. active-low.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-25 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-21 5:05 [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] KVM: SVM: Refactor svm_update_lbrv() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 6:40 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2026-07-21 9:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] KVM: nSVM: Disable LBRV in nested control cache when unsupported Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] KVM: nSVM: Sanitize nested DR6 using kvm_dr6_fixed() Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-25 17:26 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-09-25 17:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:16 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] KVM: SVM: Turn DEBUGCTL_RESERVED_BITS into a helper Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 22:29 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-07-21 5:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support Shivansh Dhiman
2026-09-25 17:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] KVM: SVM: Add Bus Lock Detect support and refactor LBRV Sean Christopherson
2026-09-25 23:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-28 18:38 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 20:18 ` Shivansh Dhiman
2026-10-01 23:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-09-30 23:05 ` Shivansh Dhiman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arau02kKKLWDOFcE@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=shivansh.dhiman@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.