From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@meta.com>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-7.5 5/5] memcg: simplify high limit handling after a charge
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:43:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as-sE3hZqFA_Wb5B@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <as9rj8KoF1oKO8rE@tiehlicka>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2026 at 01:46:23PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sat 10-10-26 14:09:57, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> [...]
> > - /* Interrupts, kernel threads, and remote chargers stop here. */
> > - if (use_worker)
> > + /*
> > + * Use a worker for interrupts, kernel threads, and tasks whose mm
> > + * does not match the charged hierarchy.
> > + */
> > + if (use_high_work) {
> > + if (!iter)
> > + return;
> > + if (allow_spinning)
> > + schedule_work(&iter->high_work);
> > + else
> > + irq_work_queue(&iter->high_irq_work);
> > return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (iter) {
>
> Would it be much simpler to bail out on iter==NULL (i.e. nothing over
> high limit) right after the loop?
>
I want this patch to not change any behavior. If we return here when iter is
NULL, we will skip a potential call to __mem_cgroup_handle_over_high() when
current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH. Though I agree that is
very subtle and most probably unexpected. If we decide to remove it, we should
do it in a separate patch. Actually I am working on a followup series where I
plan to remove the sync enforcement of memory.high and put high enforcement on
the code paths which can potentially do a lot of allocation within a single
kernel entry.
> > + /*
> > + * Count the full batch so reclaim work and delay penalties scale
> > + * with the pages charged by this task.
> > + */
> > + current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high += nr_pages;
> > + set_notify_resume(current);
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > - * Reclaim is set up above to be called from the userland
> > - * return path. But also attempt synchronous reclaim to avoid
> > - * excessive overrun while the task is still inside the
> > - * kernel. If this is successful, the return path will see it
> > - * when it rechecks the overage and simply bail out.
> > + * Earlier charges may have left high overage pending even if this charge
> > + * found no new overage. Handle it now if this charge can block, to limit
> > + * overrun while the task remains in the kernel.
> > */
> > if (current->memcg_nr_pages_over_high > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH &&
> > !(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC) &&
> > --
> > 2.53.0-Meta
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-10 21:09 [PATCH for-7.5 0/5] memcg: clean up memory.high enforcement Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 1/5] memcg: move memory.high enforcement out of try_charge_memcg() Shakeel Butt
2026-10-12 13:22 ` Harry Yoo
2026-10-12 17:13 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:13 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 2/5] memcg: use high_work for kernel threads Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:21 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 3/5] memcg: use high_work for remote charges Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:29 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 4/5] memcg: avoid queuing high_work from reclaim Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:39 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 16:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 16:59 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:55 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 19:27 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 19:36 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-10-10 21:09 ` [PATCH for-7.5 5/5] memcg: simplify high limit handling after a charge Shakeel Butt
2026-10-14 11:46 ` Michal Hocko
2026-10-14 17:43 ` Shakeel Butt [this message]
2026-10-14 19:30 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as-sE3hZqFA_Wb5B@linux.dev \
--to=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.