All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
To: Ayush Yaduvanshi <ayush37735@gmail.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: intel: ice: Modernize ice_vsi_free() with scope-based guard(mutex)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 01:36:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <as-tT0nDrchWa96T@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014110552.56976-1-ayush37735@gmail.com>

On 10/14 16:35, Ayush Yaduvanshi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Yaduvanshi <ayush37735@gmail.com>

The commit message is missing, and this patch seems to be a clean-up
patch, which is discouraged in
Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst. Also, this document says:
    Use of ``guard()`` is discouraged within any function longer than 20 lines

> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> index 9e08db376d3d..c695df442822 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ void ice_vsi_free(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&pf->sw_mutex);
> +	guard(mutex)(&pf->sw_mutex);
>  	/* updates the PF for this cleared VSI */
>  
>  	pf->vsi[vsi->idx] = NULL;
> @@ -466,7 +466,6 @@ void ice_vsi_free(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
>  	ice_vsi_free_stats(vsi);
>  	ice_vsi_free_arrays(vsi);
>  	mutex_destroy(&vsi->xdp_state_lock);
> -	mutex_unlock(&pf->sw_mutex);
>  	devm_kfree(dev, vsi);

This also extends the critical section, as devm_kfree() is now called
while holding pf->sw_mutex.

Could you please clarify why this change is necessary?

Thanks,
Kohei

>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 11:05 [PATCH] net: intel: ice: Modernize ice_vsi_free() with scope-based guard(mutex) Ayush Yaduvanshi
2026-10-14 16:36 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
2026-10-14 20:22   ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-15 11:06 ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=as-tT0nDrchWa96T@x1 \
    --to=kohei@enjuk.jp \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ayush37735@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.