From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ayush Yaduvanshi" <ayush37735@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: intel: ice: Modernize ice_vsi_free() with scope-based guard(mutex)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 11:06:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-172717@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014110552.56976-1-ayush37735@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] net: ice: TOCTOU race in ice_vsi_free() leads to UAF and double-free
--
commit e281bf0eed51082082d6b00b9ef0752bccc1ae10
Author: Ayush Yaduvanshi <ayush37735@gmail.com>
net: intel: ice: Modernize ice_vsi_free() with scope-based guard(mutex)
This commit updates ice_vsi_free() to use a scope-based guard for
pf->sw_mutex instead of explicit mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> index 9e08db376d3d0..c695df4428223 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
> @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ void ice_vsi_free(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
> return;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&pf->sw_mutex);
> + guard(mutex)(&pf->sw_mutex);
[Severity: High]
Can this sequence lead to a use-after-free and double-free?
The validity check just before this lock is performed outside the mutex:
if (!pf->vsi[vsi->idx] || pf->vsi[vsi->idx] != vsi) {
...
return;
}
Does this create a race condition where two threads can bypass the check
concurrently, serialize on pf->sw_mutex, and cause the second thread to
dereference and double-free the VSI after the first thread clears it?
> /* updates the PF for this cleared VSI */
>
> pf->vsi[vsi->idx] = NULL;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014110552.56976-1-ayush37735@gmail.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-15 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 11:05 [PATCH] net: intel: ice: Modernize ice_vsi_free() with scope-based guard(mutex) Ayush Yaduvanshi
2026-10-14 16:36 ` Kohei Enju
2026-10-14 20:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-15 11:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-172717@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ayush37735@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.