All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, fuad.tabba@linux.dev,
	 joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com,  yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,  catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	james.clark@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:40:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903160623.315525-5-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 05:05:59PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> KVM will soon want to make use of struct arm_spe_pmu, move it to a separate
> header where it will be easily accessible.
>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Looks to be a straightforward mechanical change, couple nits below but with
those addressed:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

> ---
>  drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c       | 33 +--------------------
>  include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This should be added to MAINTAINERS too I think?

>  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> index b70f3fedf028..79c571a649d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
>  #include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
> +#include <linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/printk.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -67,38 +68,6 @@ struct arm_spe_pmu_buf {
>  	void					*base;
>  };
>
> -struct arm_spe_pmu {
> -	struct pmu				pmu;
> -	struct platform_device			*pdev;
> -	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
> -	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
> -
> -	int					irq; /* PPI */
> -	u16					pmsver;
> -	u16					min_period;
> -	u16					counter_sz;
> -
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT			(1UL << 0)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP			(1UL << 1)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT			(1UL << 2)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST			(1UL << 3)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS			(1UL << 4)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD			(1UL << 7)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT			(1UL << 8)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS			(1UL << 9)
> -#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
> -	u64					features;
> -
> -	u64					pmsevfr_res0;
> -	u16					max_record_sz;
> -	u16					align;
> -	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
> -};
> -
> -#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> -
>  /* Convert a free-running index from perf into an SPE buffer offset */
>  #define PERF_IDX2OFF(idx, buf) \
>  	((idx) % ((unsigned long)(buf)->nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT))
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..af86fd184050
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_spe_pmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

Pedantic I know, sorry :P but as per Documentation/process/license-rules.rst:

      C source:	// SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression>
      C header:	/* SPDX-License-Identifier: <SPDX License Expression> */
      ...

So should be /* */ here.

> +/*
> + * Split from driver/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c

NIT: should be drivers/...

> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2016 ARM Limited
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +#define __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/container_of.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +struct arm_spe_pmu {
> +	struct pmu				pmu;
> +	struct platform_device			*pdev;
> +	cpumask_t				supported_cpus;
> +	struct hlist_node			hotplug_node;
> +
> +	int					irq; /* PPI */
> +	u16					pmsver;
> +	u16					min_period;
> +	u16					counter_sz;
> +
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT			(1UL << 0)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP			(1UL << 1)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT			(1UL << 2)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ARCH_INST			(1UL << 3)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_LDS			(1UL << 4)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_ERND			(1UL << 5)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_INV_FILT_EVT		(1UL << 6)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DISCARD			(1UL << 7)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_EFT			(1UL << 8)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_FDS			(1UL << 9)
> +#define SPE_PMU_FEAT_DEV_PROBED			(1UL << 63)
> +	u64					features;
> +
> +	u64					pmsevfr_res0;
> +	u16					max_record_sz;
> +	u16					align;
> +	struct perf_output_handle __percpu	*handle;
> +};
> +
> +#define to_spe_pmu(p) (container_of(p, struct arm_spe_pmu, pmu))
> +
> +#endif /* __PERF_ARM_SPE_PMU_H__ */
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>

--
Cheers, Lorenzo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-15 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-03 16:05 [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 01/28] arm64/sysreg: Add the nVM field to PMBLIMITR_EL1 Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 13:23   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 02/28] arm64/sysreg: Define MDCR_EL2.E2PB values Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 13:52   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 03/28] KVM: arm64: Add CONFIG_KVM_ARM_SPE Kconfig option Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:15   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v7 04/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Move struct arm_spe_pmu to a separate header file Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:40   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 05/28] perf: arm_spe_pmu: Add PMBIDR_EL1 and PMSIDR_EL1 to struct arm_spe_pmu Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 15:12   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 06/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_SPE capability Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 16:51   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 07/28] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_ARM_VCPU_SPE VCPU feature Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 08/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if protected KVM is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 09/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Enable SPE virtualization only in VHE mode Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 10/28] HACK! KVM: arm64: Disable SPE virtualization if nested virt is enabled Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 11/28] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 12/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the interrupt number Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 13/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to set the SPE device Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04  9:32     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 14/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE VCPU device attribute to initialize SPE Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 15/28] KVM: arm64: Use PMSVer from the assigned SPE instance Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:26     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 16/28] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:28     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 17/28] KVM: arm64: Apply a RES0 mask to PMBLIMITR_EL1 writes Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 10:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 18/28] KVM: arm64: config: Use functions from spe.c to test FEAT_SPE_{FnE,FDS} Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 19/28] KVM: arm64: VHE: Context switch SPE state Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 11:35     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 20/28] KVM: arm64: Allow guest SPE physical timestamps only if kernel allows it Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 13:45     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 21/28] KVM: arm64: Handle SPE maintenance interrupts Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:04     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 22/28] arm64: errata: Disable SPE in KVM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 23/28] KVM: arm64: Add kvm-arm.ignore_spe_errata kernel parameter Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 24/28] arm64: errata: Don't enable guest buffer if misprogrammed Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 25/28] KVM: arm64: at: Use callback for reading descriptor Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 26/28] KVM: arm64: Map memory on a SPE stage 2 fault Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 27/28] KVM: arm64: Handle dirty page logging when SPE feature is set Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 17:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:41     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:06 ` [RFC PATCH v7 28/28] KVM: arm64: Allow the creation of a SPE enabled VM Alexandru Elisei
2026-09-03 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-04 14:09     ` Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v7 00/28] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2026-10-15 12:50   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-10-15 13:22     ` Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atDgBR0WOGHUsLaF@gremlin \
    --to=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.