From: wsa+renesas <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Cc: "biju.das.au" <biju.das.au@gmail.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 11/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add RZ/G3L SDHI support
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 13:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atnyAfePwJ_9kenH@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY3PR01MB11346D30496CABEA390A2385986832@TY3PR01MB11346.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1728 bytes --]
> > So initially bit 8+9 will have a value. This will be moved to bit 16
> > + 17 first Then we clear the bits 8 + 9. Bit8(SCLKEN) and
> > Bit9(SDCLKOFFEN)
Okay, I get it now. Thanks for the explanation.
> > > Does RZG3L have a dedicated naming? I'd guess *_HWADJ1. I wonder if it
> > > makes sense to have a dedicated define for it. I tend to think so.
> >
> > There is no *_HWADJ1 mentioned in HW manual.
> > Hardware manual mention this register as "SDm_SCC_HWADJ2"
OK.
> >
> > >
> > > > + if (hwadj2)
> > > > + sd_scc_write32(host, priv, RZG3L_SDHI_SCC_HWADJ2, 0x3FFF);
> > > > + } else {
> > > > sd_scc_write32(host, priv, SH_MOBILE_SDHI_SCC_TMPPORT2, 0x1);
> > > > + if (hwadj2)
> > > > + sd_scc_write32(host, priv, RZG3L_SDHI_SCC_HWADJ2, 0xFF);
> > >
> > > Magic values?
> >
> > HW manual mentions the following,
> >
> > HWADJ2[15:0] 1FFh Hardware Adjustment.
> > For 1.8V operation, specify 00FFh.
> > For 3.3V operation, specify 3FFFh.
> >
> > Is the below macros ok for representing magic values??
> >
> > SD_SCC_HWADJ2_1_8V 0xFF
> > SD_SCC_HWADJ2_3_3V 0x3FFF
If you replace the 'SD_'-prefix with 'RZG3L_SDHI_', then yes :)
> > > I wonder how likely it is that a SDHI variant has either only this or
> > > only TUNING_DELAY. Do you know of one? What would you think about merging the two? You know the RZ SDHI
> > much better...
> >
> > HWADJ2 present only on RZ/G3L,
> > whereas TUNING_DELAY present on both RZ/G2L and RZ/G3L.
Ok, no merging then. Was worth asking.
One more thing I noticed. I think you can drop 'sdhi_quirks_rzg3l' in
favor of 'sdhi_quirks_fixed_addr', or?
Good luck hacking the updates. And thanks for the patience!
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 17:16 [PATCH v24 00/15] Add Renesas RZ/G3L SD/eMMC support Biju
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 01/15] dt-bindings: mmc: renesas,sdhi: Document RZ/G3L (r9a08g046) SoC Biju
2026-09-02 10:45 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 02/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Clean up whitespace and add OF table sentinels Biju
2026-09-02 10:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 6:40 ` Biju Das
2026-09-09 18:46 ` wsa+renesas
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 03/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add clk_mask field to support flexible clock divider widths Biju
2026-09-02 10:51 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 10:54 ` Biju Das
2026-09-02 10:54 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 11:03 ` Biju Das
2026-09-10 21:52 ` wsa+renesas
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 04/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add max_divider field to support SoC-specific clock ranges Biju
2026-09-02 11:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 12:46 ` Biju Das
2026-09-10 21:56 ` wsa+renesas
2026-09-14 10:37 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 05/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add SDHI_SD_CLK_CTL_DIV1 macro for 1/1 option Biju
2026-09-02 11:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 06/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Make clock divider mask configurable Biju
2026-09-02 11:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 12:48 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 07/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add tuning delay support for RZ/G2L Biju
2026-09-03 9:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 14:47 ` Biju Das
2026-09-13 17:47 ` wsa+renesas
2026-09-14 10:37 ` Biju Das
2026-09-03 9:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 15:15 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 08/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add TMIO_MMC_INTERNAL_DIVIDER flag Biju
2026-09-03 9:37 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-07 6:37 ` Biju Das
2026-10-22 9:03 ` wsa+renesas
2026-10-23 13:27 ` Biju Das
2026-09-03 9:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-07 7:19 ` Biju Das
2026-09-22 12:36 ` Biju Das
2026-10-22 9:30 ` wsa+renesas
2026-10-23 13:35 ` Biju Das
2026-10-23 16:10 ` wsa+renesas
2026-10-26 14:47 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 09/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add optional axis/axim reset controls Biju
2026-09-03 9:48 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 10/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add write32_hook for CTL_SD_CARD_CLK_CTL register writes Biju
2026-09-03 10:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-07 8:19 ` Biju Das
2026-10-22 9:58 ` wsa+renesas
2026-09-03 10:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-07 8:27 ` Biju Das
2026-10-22 10:00 ` wsa+renesas
2026-10-23 14:27 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 11/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add RZ/G3L SDHI support Biju
2026-09-03 12:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-07 12:53 ` Biju Das
2026-09-22 12:35 ` Biju Das
2026-10-22 11:22 ` wsa+renesas [this message]
2026-10-23 15:48 ` Biju Das
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 12/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Save and restore IOVS across suspend/resume Biju
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 13/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Make HS400 OSEL bit configurable per SoC Biju
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 14/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add RZ/G3L HS400 support Biju
2026-08-20 17:16 ` [PATCH v24 15/15] mmc: renesas_sdhi: Add HS400 enhanced strobe support for RZ/G3L Biju
2026-09-01 14:52 ` [PATCH v24 00/15] Add Renesas RZ/G3L SD/eMMC support Wolfram Sang
2026-09-03 20:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-09-04 2:24 ` Biju Das
2026-09-04 8:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atnyAfePwJ_9kenH@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
--cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.