All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	 Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Drop unused and unreachable kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 07:34:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auitiPKnFueBJzPA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102153228.240804-H-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Drop s390's kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() stub as the one and only call site
> > is wrapped with "#ifndef CONFIG_S390".
> 
> In the somehow near future I'll remove those #ifdefs and use the kick
> stuff for kvm_arm64. The native s390 KVM then must at least keep an
> (unused) symbol at hand. It seems that the compiler could not optimize
> those calls away. So let's keep it there so I do not have to re-add it
> soon.

Please read the rest of the series.  kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() goes away
entirely.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	 Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Drop unused and unreachable kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 07:34:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auitiPKnFueBJzPA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102153228.240804-H-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Drop s390's kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() stub as the one and only call site
> > is wrapped with "#ifndef CONFIG_S390".
> 
> In the somehow near future I'll remove those #ifdefs and use the kick
> stuff for kvm_arm64. The native s390 KVM then must at least keep an
> (unused) symbol at hand. It seems that the compiler could not optimize
> those calls away. So let's keep it there so I do not have to re-add it
> soon.

Please read the rest of the series.  kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() goes away
entirely.

-- 
kvm-riscv mailing list
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>,
	 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	 Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>, Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
	 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	 Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	 Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	 Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>,
	Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	 kvm@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,  linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,  linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Stefan Teodorescu <fane@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Drop unused and unreachable kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 07:34:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auitiPKnFueBJzPA@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102153228.240804-H-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2026, Steffen Eiden wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2026 at 12:02:53PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Drop s390's kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() stub as the one and only call site
> > is wrapped with "#ifndef CONFIG_S390".
> 
> In the somehow near future I'll remove those #ifdefs and use the kick
> stuff for kvm_arm64. The native s390 KVM then must at least keep an
> (unused) symbol at hand. It seems that the compiler could not optimize
> those calls away. So let's keep it there so I do not have to re-add it
> soon.

Please read the rest of the series.  kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() goes away
entirely.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Ensure WAIT requests actually wait Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: s390: Drop unused and unreachable kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 15:32   ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-02 15:32     ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-02 15:32     ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-02 15:34     ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2026-11-02 15:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 15:34       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-03 11:45       ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-03 11:45         ` Steffen Eiden
2026-11-03 11:45         ` Steffen Eiden
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: Add a @force param to __kvm_vcpu_kick() for PPC backwards compatibility Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] KVM: PPC: Explicitly force IPIs when directly kicking vCPUs Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 14:48   ` Gautam Menghani
2026-10-30 14:48     ` Gautam Menghani
2026-10-30 14:48     ` Gautam Menghani
2026-10-30 18:57     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 18:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-30 18:57       ` Sean Christopherson
2026-11-02 14:38       ` Gautam Menghani
2026-11-02 14:38         ` Gautam Menghani
2026-11-02 14:38         ` Gautam Menghani
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: MIPS: Rework kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() to use standard implementation Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_should_kick() to common code as kvm_vcpu_should_kick() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: Plumb the full request into __kvm_vcpu_kick() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: Drop kvm_vcpu_should_kick() and use kvm_request_needs_ipi() Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2026-10-28 19:02   ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auitiPKnFueBJzPA@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=fane@google.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.