From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify half-baked review tags
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:44:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxQD7SNOOL3uZ49@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWA1LNNaih3DHUM7yxpoyrnUndWDKpOjqb6_hSWWs7KHw@mail.gmail.com>
> > > Reviewed-by even with the "# subpart" still appears in person's credits
> > > and reviewing entire patch of 700 lines of diff code (like Frank's SPI
> > > patch) is not the same as 10 diff codes for one driver.
> >
> > Yes, if you want to spoil that, you'd need to introduce
> >
> > Partly-reviewed-by: ...
> >
> > or something.
>
> With a parameter taking a percentage or number of files or lines,
> to serve as input for the Big Statistics Calculation?
I assume Krzysztof addresses people playing number games. While I do
understand this motivation to raise the bar, I also know people will
find ways to jump over the higher bar etc...
Quoting Joshua/WOPR: "A STRANGE GAME. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO
PLAY"
Maybe we should stop publishing development statistics? ;)
Seriously, the main thing I am aiming at is to improve code maintenance.
And so, the "# subparts" are much more interesting to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:27 [PATCH v2] docs: submitting-patches: Clarify half-baked review tags Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 8:50 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 8:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 9:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 10:59 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 11:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-11-05 11:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 12:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 14:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2026-11-05 9:44 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-11-05 9:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:19 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 9:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-05 10:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 9:30 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-11-05 15:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 15:44 ` Juergen Gross
2026-11-05 15:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-05 15:59 ` Jürgen Groß
2026-11-05 16:22 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-11-09 23:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-11-09 23:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxQD7SNOOL3uZ49@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=workflows@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.