From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 13:12:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aux_UhaXFYy0ZXhm@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-slub_tiny_rework-v3-3-0484ce59eabb@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 09:43:52AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> Setting slab_min_order and slab_max_order as boot-time parameters
> currently has several not so great aspects:
>
> - slab_min_order is not checked against MAX_PAGE_ORDER
> - slab_min_order can raise slab_max_order
> - processing requires custom callbacks, their execution order
> depends on the order of boot time parameters specified
> - upcoming SLUB_TINY changes would be more complicated
>
> Instead of custom callbacks, introduce __initdata variables that hold
> the boot-time parameter values (if given). All inputs are then evaluated
> deterministically in kmem_cache_init(). slab_min_order is always capped
> at slab_max_order and cannot raise it.
>
> debug_guardpage_minorder() still overrides any given boot time params,
> but it could be changed if there's a use case.
>
> While at it, rename the slub_min/max_order variables and
> slub_min_objects to have a "slab_" prefix instead, as their values
> determine the sizing of slabs, and the "slub_" prefix already became
> deprecated also for the boot-time parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
Looks good to me,
Reviewed-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 12:59 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] kasan, " Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:12 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 14:30 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 15:02 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-08 17:00 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-08 17:58 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:12 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:19 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:24 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-10 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aux_UhaXFYy0ZXhm@thinkstation \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.