From: Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>
To: "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>, Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 12:59:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auxzbxa40B6uLAyN@thinkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105-slub_tiny_rework-v3-1-0484ce59eabb@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 09:43:50AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) wrote:
> Several of slab kunit tests allocate and free a single object from the
> test cache, perform intentional UAF actions and validation, while
> expecting the empty slab to stay on the partial list.
>
> This subtly relies on non-zero s->min_partial. It currently compile-time
> defaults to a non-zero value, but in theory a sysfs write racing with
> the kunit test could change it.
> More importantly, the upcoming
> CONFIG_SLUB_TINY changes will make it possible to run the kunit tests
> with s->min_partial being a compile-time zero, which means the tests
> will now do unintended UAF writes on the page allocator level, and also
> report failures, as flagged by sashiko [1].
Makes sense.
> To prevent this in a robust way, add an extra object allocation to the
> tests, that will prevent the slab being freed. Use migrate_disable() to
> prevent migration to a different NUMA node, which would place the
> allocation to a different slab.
>
> [1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261024-slub_tiny_rework-v2-0-bf1419ab5ffd@kernel.org?part=8
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> ---
Looks good to me,
Acked-by: Harry Yoo (Meta) <harry@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
Harry / Hyeonggon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 8:43 [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] slab, kunit: pin test slabs by an extra allocation Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 12:59 ` Harry Yoo [this message]
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] kasan, " Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:03 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] mm, slab: refactor slab_min/max_order handling Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:12 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] mm, slab: introduce slab_debug=N Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 13:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-05 14:30 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 14:36 ` Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-05 15:02 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] mm, slab: rework KMALLOC_RECLAIM handling of SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-08 17:00 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] mm, slab: make SLUB_TINY handling dynamic for sizing decisions Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-08 17:58 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] mm, slab: convert CONFIG_SLUB_TINY checks to kmem_cache_debug() Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:12 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mm, slab: remove remaining compile-time checks for CONFIG_SLUB_TINY Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:19 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mm, slab: add slab_tiny boot param Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:24 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-05 8:43 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] mm, slab: deprecate CONFIG_SLUB_TINY and reduce its Kconfig effects Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)
2026-11-10 14:39 ` Harry Yoo
2026-11-10 14:46 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] replace CONFIG_SLUB_TINY with a slab_tiny boot parameter Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auxzbxa40B6uLAyN@thinkstation \
--to=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hao.li@linux.dev \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.