All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, alex@ghiti.fr,
	pratyush@kernel.org, graf@amazon.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	guoren@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] riscv: Add support for kexec handover (KHO)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:24:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avLi0_mYXatBWmpL@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179415145358.358073.165272378597657083.b4-review@b4>

On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 10:24:13AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > The generic handover paths are already in place on RISC-V: the outgoing
> > kernel publishes the handover FDT and the bootmem list in /chosen of the
> > DTB built by of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(), and the incoming kernel
> > picks both up while scanning that node. Only the architecture symbol is
> > missing.
> > 
> > Set it to 64BIT && MMU: ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE is already 64BIT only,
> > and KEXEC_HANDOVER selects CMA, which depends on MMU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index e7891a2a89da..a5c56252ff44 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -1125,6 +1125,9 @@ config ARCH_SELECTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >  config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> >  	def_bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >  
> > +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_HANDOVER
> > +	def_bool 64BIT && MMU
> > +
> >  config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
> >  	def_bool y
> 
> Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> 
> 
> But pre-reqs. should be applied prior taking this series:
> 
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261023054518.3258350-1-gthelen@google.com

I'm planning to send it to Linus this week.

> 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261104-kho-bootmem-sizing-v2-0-b0d1a834780f@kernel.org

This is easy if we take it via liveupdate tree :) 

@ricsv folks, how do you prefer to play it?

> -- 
> Pasha
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>,
	pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com, alex@ghiti.fr,
	pratyush@kernel.org, graf@amazon.com, shuah@kernel.org,
	guoren@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] riscv: Add support for kexec handover (KHO)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 11:24:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <avLi0_mYXatBWmpL@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179415145358.358073.165272378597657083.b4-review@b4>

On Sun, Nov 08, 2026 at 10:24:13AM -0500, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> > The generic handover paths are already in place on RISC-V: the outgoing
> > kernel publishes the handover FDT and the bootmem list in /chosen of the
> > DTB built by of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(), and the incoming kernel
> > picks both up while scanning that node. Only the architecture symbol is
> > missing.
> > 
> > Set it to 64BIT && MMU: ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE is already 64BIT only,
> > and KEXEC_HANDOVER selects CMA, which depends on MMU.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <cp0613@linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index e7891a2a89da..a5c56252ff44 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -1125,6 +1125,9 @@ config ARCH_SELECTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >  config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> >  	def_bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_FILE
> >  
> > +config ARCH_SUPPORTS_KEXEC_HANDOVER
> > +	def_bool 64BIT && MMU
> > +
> >  config ARCH_SUPPORTS_CRASH_DUMP
> >  	def_bool y
> 
> Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> 
> 
> But pre-reqs. should be applied prior taking this series:
> 
> 1. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261023054518.3258350-1-gthelen@google.com

I'm planning to send it to Linus this week.

> 2. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261104-kho-bootmem-sizing-v2-0-b0d1a834780f@kernel.org

This is easy if we take it via liveupdate tree :) 

@ricsv folks, how do you prefer to play it?

> -- 
> Pasha
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06  7:14 [PATCH v3 0/4] riscv: Enable kexec handover and live update Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14 ` Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] riscv: Call early_ioremap_setup() before parsing the DTB Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14   ` Chen Pei
2026-11-07  7:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 15:24   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-08 15:24     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-06  7:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] riscv: Add support for kexec handover (KHO) Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14   ` Chen Pei
2026-11-07  7:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:27     ` Chen Pei
2026-11-08 15:24   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-08 15:24     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-10  9:24     ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2026-11-10  9:24       ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-06  7:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] selftests: kho: Add riscv support Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14   ` Chen Pei
2026-11-07  7:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 11:16   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-08 11:16     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-08 15:24   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-08 15:24     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-06  7:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests: liveupdate: " Chen Pei
2026-11-06  7:14   ` Chen Pei
2026-11-07  7:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 11:16   ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-08 11:16     ` Mike Rapoport
2026-11-08 15:24   ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-08 15:24     ` Pasha Tatashin
2026-11-09 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] riscv: Enable kexec handover and live update Chen Pei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=avLi0_mYXatBWmpL@kernel.org \
    --to=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=cp0613@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=pjw@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.