All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"jon@solid-run.com" <jon@solid-run.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:50:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b546b40c-d047-87a4-1892-1bb9575ecab7@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2021 10:48
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> joro@8bytes.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> jon@solid-run.com; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 8/5/21 10:07 AM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E.b -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe
> > memory ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity
> > mapping in SMMU.
> 
> I used your series and RMRs to force a guest iommu (vSMMUv3 nested stage
> use case) to have a flat mapping for IOVAs within [0x8000000, 0x8100000]
> (matching MSI_IOVA_BASE and MSI_IOVA_LENGTH) used by the host to map
> MSI
> physical doorbells.
> 
> That way when an assigned device protected by a vSMMUv3 implemented
> upon
> nested stage issues an MSI transaction, let's say using IOVA=0x8000000,
> we would get:
>                     S1 (guest)           S2 (host)
> 0x8000000            0x8000000            Physical DB
> 
> This method was suggested by Jean-Philippe (added in CC) and it
> simplifies the nested stage integration because we don't have to care
> about nested stage MSI bindings.
> 
> However if I understand correctly we cannot define a range of SIDs using
> the same RMR (due to the single mapping bit which must be set, Table 5
> flags format). This is a spec restriction and not an issue with your series.

Yes. The spec currently mandates single mapping bit to be set.

> 
> As VFIO devices can be hot-plugged we thus need to create as many RMR
> nodes as potential BDFs, leading to 256 * 6 = 1536 RMR nodes if you have
> 5 pcie root ports as it is usual in VMs. Then this causes some trouble
> at qemu level for instance, wrt migration. See [RFC]
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add IORT RMR regions to handle MSI nested binding.
> 
> Do you know if there is a plan to remove the single mapping limitation
> in the spec?

I would imagine so. In an earlier comment[1], Robin did mention about possible
relaxing of this in future spec revision.

Thanks,
Shameer
1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com/

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
> > controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
> > purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
> > access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
> > IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
> > memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
> > these in SMMU.
> >
> > Change History:
> >
> > v6 --> v7
> >
> > The only change from v6 is the fix pointed out by Steve to
> > the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in patch #8.
> >
> > Thanks to the Tested-by tags by Laurentiu with SMMUv2 and
> > Hanjun/Huiqiang with SMMUv3 for v6. I haven't added the tags
> > yet as the series still needs more review[1].
> >
> > Feedback and tests on this series is very much appreciated.
> >
> > v5 --> v6
> > - Addressed comments from Robin & Lorenzo.
> >   : Moved iort_parse_rmr() to acpi_iort_init() from
> >     iort_init_platform_devices().
> >   : Removed use of struct iort_rmr_entry during the initial
> >     parse. Using struct iommu_resv_region instead.
> >   : Report RMR address alignment and overlap errors, but continue.
> >   : Reworked arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() (patch # 6).
> > - Updated SMMUv2 bypass SMR code. Thanks to Jon N (patch #8).
> > - Set IOMMU protection flags(IOMMU_CACHE, IOMMU_MMIO) based
> >   on Type of RMR region. Suggested by Jon N.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> > [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210716083442.1708-1-shameerali.koloth
> um.thodi@huawei.com/T/#m043c95b869973a834b2fd57f3e1ed0325c84f3b7
> > ------
> > v4 --> v5
> >  -Added a fw_data union to struct iommu_resv_region and removed
> >   struct iommu_rmr (Based on comments from Joerg/Robin).
> >  -Added iommu_put_rmrs() to release mem.
> >  -Thanks to Steve for verifying on SMMUv2, but not added the Tested-by
> >   yet because of the above changes.
> >
> > v3 -->v4
> > -Included the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install changes suggested by
> >  Steve(patch #7)
> > -As per Robin's comments, RMR reserve implementation is now
> >  more generic  (patch #8) and dropped v3 patches 8 and 10.
> > -Rebase to 5.13-rc1
> >
> > RFC v2 --> v3
> >  -Dropped RFC tag as the ACPICA header changes are now ready to be
> >   part of 5.13[0]. But this series still has a dependency on that patch.
> >  -Added IORT E.b related changes(node flags, _DSM function 5 checks for
> >   PCIe).
> >  -Changed RMR to stream id mapping from M:N to M:1 as per the spec and
> >   discussion here[1].
> >  -Last two patches add support for SMMUv2(Thanks to Jon Nettleton!)
> > ------
> >
> > Jon Nettleton (1):
> >   iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force
> >     bypass
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c |  76 +++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c       |  48 ++++++
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  89 +++++++++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |  13 ++
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  11 ++
> >  7 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
Cc: "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"jon@solid-run.com" <jon@solid-run.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun \(Hanjun Guo\)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:50:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b546b40c-d047-87a4-1892-1bb9575ecab7@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2021 10:48
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> joro@8bytes.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> jon@solid-run.com; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 8/5/21 10:07 AM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E.b -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe
> > memory ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity
> > mapping in SMMU.
> 
> I used your series and RMRs to force a guest iommu (vSMMUv3 nested stage
> use case) to have a flat mapping for IOVAs within [0x8000000, 0x8100000]
> (matching MSI_IOVA_BASE and MSI_IOVA_LENGTH) used by the host to map
> MSI
> physical doorbells.
> 
> That way when an assigned device protected by a vSMMUv3 implemented
> upon
> nested stage issues an MSI transaction, let's say using IOVA=0x8000000,
> we would get:
>                     S1 (guest)           S2 (host)
> 0x8000000            0x8000000            Physical DB
> 
> This method was suggested by Jean-Philippe (added in CC) and it
> simplifies the nested stage integration because we don't have to care
> about nested stage MSI bindings.
> 
> However if I understand correctly we cannot define a range of SIDs using
> the same RMR (due to the single mapping bit which must be set, Table 5
> flags format). This is a spec restriction and not an issue with your series.

Yes. The spec currently mandates single mapping bit to be set.

> 
> As VFIO devices can be hot-plugged we thus need to create as many RMR
> nodes as potential BDFs, leading to 256 * 6 = 1536 RMR nodes if you have
> 5 pcie root ports as it is usual in VMs. Then this causes some trouble
> at qemu level for instance, wrt migration. See [RFC]
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add IORT RMR regions to handle MSI nested binding.
> 
> Do you know if there is a plan to remove the single mapping limitation
> in the spec?

I would imagine so. In an earlier comment[1], Robin did mention about possible
relaxing of this in future spec revision.

Thanks,
Shameer
1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com/

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
> > controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
> > purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
> > access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
> > IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
> > memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
> > these in SMMU.
> >
> > Change History:
> >
> > v6 --> v7
> >
> > The only change from v6 is the fix pointed out by Steve to
> > the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in patch #8.
> >
> > Thanks to the Tested-by tags by Laurentiu with SMMUv2 and
> > Hanjun/Huiqiang with SMMUv3 for v6. I haven't added the tags
> > yet as the series still needs more review[1].
> >
> > Feedback and tests on this series is very much appreciated.
> >
> > v5 --> v6
> > - Addressed comments from Robin & Lorenzo.
> >   : Moved iort_parse_rmr() to acpi_iort_init() from
> >     iort_init_platform_devices().
> >   : Removed use of struct iort_rmr_entry during the initial
> >     parse. Using struct iommu_resv_region instead.
> >   : Report RMR address alignment and overlap errors, but continue.
> >   : Reworked arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() (patch # 6).
> > - Updated SMMUv2 bypass SMR code. Thanks to Jon N (patch #8).
> > - Set IOMMU protection flags(IOMMU_CACHE, IOMMU_MMIO) based
> >   on Type of RMR region. Suggested by Jon N.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> > [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210716083442.1708-1-shameerali.koloth
> um.thodi@huawei.com/T/#m043c95b869973a834b2fd57f3e1ed0325c84f3b7
> > ------
> > v4 --> v5
> >  -Added a fw_data union to struct iommu_resv_region and removed
> >   struct iommu_rmr (Based on comments from Joerg/Robin).
> >  -Added iommu_put_rmrs() to release mem.
> >  -Thanks to Steve for verifying on SMMUv2, but not added the Tested-by
> >   yet because of the above changes.
> >
> > v3 -->v4
> > -Included the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install changes suggested by
> >  Steve(patch #7)
> > -As per Robin's comments, RMR reserve implementation is now
> >  more generic  (patch #8) and dropped v3 patches 8 and 10.
> > -Rebase to 5.13-rc1
> >
> > RFC v2 --> v3
> >  -Dropped RFC tag as the ACPICA header changes are now ready to be
> >   part of 5.13[0]. But this series still has a dependency on that patch.
> >  -Added IORT E.b related changes(node flags, _DSM function 5 checks for
> >   PCIe).
> >  -Changed RMR to stream id mapping from M:N to M:1 as per the spec and
> >   discussion here[1].
> >  -Last two patches add support for SMMUv2(Thanks to Jon Nettleton!)
> > ------
> >
> > Jon Nettleton (1):
> >   iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force
> >     bypass
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c |  76 +++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c       |  48 ++++++
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  89 +++++++++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |  13 ++
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  11 ++
> >  7 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >

_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	"jon@solid-run.com" <jon@solid-run.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:50:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b546b40c-d047-87a4-1892-1bb9575ecab7@redhat.com>

Hi Eric,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2021 10:48
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> joro@8bytes.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> jon@solid-run.com; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> Hi Shameer,
> 
> On 8/5/21 10:07 AM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E.b -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe
> > memory ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity
> > mapping in SMMU.
> 
> I used your series and RMRs to force a guest iommu (vSMMUv3 nested stage
> use case) to have a flat mapping for IOVAs within [0x8000000, 0x8100000]
> (matching MSI_IOVA_BASE and MSI_IOVA_LENGTH) used by the host to map
> MSI
> physical doorbells.
> 
> That way when an assigned device protected by a vSMMUv3 implemented
> upon
> nested stage issues an MSI transaction, let's say using IOVA=0x8000000,
> we would get:
>                     S1 (guest)           S2 (host)
> 0x8000000            0x8000000            Physical DB
> 
> This method was suggested by Jean-Philippe (added in CC) and it
> simplifies the nested stage integration because we don't have to care
> about nested stage MSI bindings.
> 
> However if I understand correctly we cannot define a range of SIDs using
> the same RMR (due to the single mapping bit which must be set, Table 5
> flags format). This is a spec restriction and not an issue with your series.

Yes. The spec currently mandates single mapping bit to be set.

> 
> As VFIO devices can be hot-plugged we thus need to create as many RMR
> nodes as potential BDFs, leading to 256 * 6 = 1536 RMR nodes if you have
> 5 pcie root ports as it is usual in VMs. Then this causes some trouble
> at qemu level for instance, wrt migration. See [RFC]
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add IORT RMR regions to handle MSI nested binding.
> 
> Do you know if there is a plan to remove the single mapping limitation
> in the spec?

I would imagine so. In an earlier comment[1], Robin did mention about possible
relaxing of this in future spec revision.

Thanks,
Shameer
1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com/

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
> > controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
> > purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
> > access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
> > IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
> > memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
> > these in SMMU.
> >
> > Change History:
> >
> > v6 --> v7
> >
> > The only change from v6 is the fix pointed out by Steve to
> > the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in patch #8.
> >
> > Thanks to the Tested-by tags by Laurentiu with SMMUv2 and
> > Hanjun/Huiqiang with SMMUv3 for v6. I haven't added the tags
> > yet as the series still needs more review[1].
> >
> > Feedback and tests on this series is very much appreciated.
> >
> > v5 --> v6
> > - Addressed comments from Robin & Lorenzo.
> >   : Moved iort_parse_rmr() to acpi_iort_init() from
> >     iort_init_platform_devices().
> >   : Removed use of struct iort_rmr_entry during the initial
> >     parse. Using struct iommu_resv_region instead.
> >   : Report RMR address alignment and overlap errors, but continue.
> >   : Reworked arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() (patch # 6).
> > - Updated SMMUv2 bypass SMR code. Thanks to Jon N (patch #8).
> > - Set IOMMU protection flags(IOMMU_CACHE, IOMMU_MMIO) based
> >   on Type of RMR region. Suggested by Jon N.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> > [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210716083442.1708-1-shameerali.koloth
> um.thodi@huawei.com/T/#m043c95b869973a834b2fd57f3e1ed0325c84f3b7
> > ------
> > v4 --> v5
> >  -Added a fw_data union to struct iommu_resv_region and removed
> >   struct iommu_rmr (Based on comments from Joerg/Robin).
> >  -Added iommu_put_rmrs() to release mem.
> >  -Thanks to Steve for verifying on SMMUv2, but not added the Tested-by
> >   yet because of the above changes.
> >
> > v3 -->v4
> > -Included the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install changes suggested by
> >  Steve(patch #7)
> > -As per Robin's comments, RMR reserve implementation is now
> >  more generic  (patch #8) and dropped v3 patches 8 and 10.
> > -Rebase to 5.13-rc1
> >
> > RFC v2 --> v3
> >  -Dropped RFC tag as the ACPICA header changes are now ready to be
> >   part of 5.13[0]. But this series still has a dependency on that patch.
> >  -Added IORT E.b related changes(node flags, _DSM function 5 checks for
> >   PCIe).
> >  -Changed RMR to stream id mapping from M:N to M:1 as per the spec and
> >   discussion here[1].
> >  -Last two patches add support for SMMUv2(Thanks to Jon Nettleton!)
> > ------
> >
> > Jon Nettleton (1):
> >   iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> >   iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> >   iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> >   ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force
> >     bypass
> >   iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> >   iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> >  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c                   | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c |  76 +++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c       |  48 ++++++
> >  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c                   |  89 +++++++++-
> >  include/linux/acpi_iort.h                   |   7 +
> >  include/linux/dma-iommu.h                   |  13 ++
> >  include/linux/iommu.h                       |  11 ++
> >  7 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05  8:07 [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-20 10:22   ` Steven Price
2021-08-20 10:22     ` Steven Price
2021-08-20 10:22     ` Steven Price
2021-10-08 12:14   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  6:57     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  6:57       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  6:57       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11  5:47       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:47         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:47         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 13:47         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 13:47           ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 13:47           ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 16:03   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:03     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:03     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:31     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 16:31       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 16:31       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 18:37     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-08-05 18:37       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-08-05 18:37       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-06 17:44     ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 17:44       ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 17:44       ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 19:51       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-06 19:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-06 19:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:26         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:26           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:26           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:52           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:52             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:52             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  8:26             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  8:26               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  8:26               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 11:16               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 11:16                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 11:16                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-17 11:26                 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-17 11:26                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-17 11:26                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-05 10:53                   ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-05 10:53                     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-05 10:53                     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-08 12:48   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:48     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:48     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  7:06     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 14:04       ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 14:04         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 14:04         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-12  8:00         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-12  8:00           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-12  8:00           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 12:18           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 12:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 12:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 13:26             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 13:26               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 13:26               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 14:37               ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 14:37                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 14:37                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 15:11                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 15:11                   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 15:11                   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11  5:59     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:59       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:59       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:03   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:03     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:03     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11  5:51     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 15:43   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 15:43     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 15:43     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force bypass Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:09   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:09     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:09     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  7:07     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:07       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:07       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 15:00       ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:00         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:00         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:42         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 15:42           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 15:42           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:35   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:35     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:35     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 14:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 14:09       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 14:09       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-31  5:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-31  5:06         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-31  5:06         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-30  9:47 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30  9:47   ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30  9:47   ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 10:50   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2021-09-30 10:50     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-30 10:50     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
2022-01-25 19:30   ` Robin Murphy
2022-01-25 19:30     ` Robin Murphy
2022-01-25 19:30     ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com \
    --to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.