From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:41:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476800897-19898-7-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
On 2016-10-18 07:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Move the functions' definitions to remove unnecessary
> declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>
> New patch added in v2 series.
>
> drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 133
> +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> index 3a87e88..144b11f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> @@ -22,13 +22,6 @@
> #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MIN_UV 1200000
> #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MAX_UV 1200000
>
> -static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> - const char *, bool);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> - const char *);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common);
> -
> int ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate(struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_calibration *tbl_A,
> int tbl_size_A,
> @@ -75,45 +68,6 @@ out:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate);
>
> -struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> - const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> -{
> - int err;
> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> - struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> - if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> - generic_phy = NULL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> - common_cfg->dev = dev;
> -
> -out:
> - return generic_phy;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> -
> /*
> * This assumes the embedded phy structure inside generic_phy is of
> type
> * struct ufs_qcom_phy. In order to function properly it's crucial
> @@ -154,6 +108,45 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device
> *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> + const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> + struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> + generic_phy = NULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> + common_cfg->dev = dev;
> +
> +out:
> + return generic_phy;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> +
> static int __ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(struct device *dev,
> const char *name, struct clk **clk_out, bool err_print)
> {
> @@ -224,30 +217,6 @@ out:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks);
>
> -int
> -ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> -{
> - int err;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> - "vdda-pll");
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> - "vdda-phy");
> -
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - /* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> - __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> - "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> -out:
> - return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> -
> static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *dev,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, const char *name, bool optional)
> {
> @@ -316,6 +285,30 @@ static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device
> *dev,
> return __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(dev, vreg, name, false);
> }
>
> +int
> +ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> + "vdda-pll");
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> + "vdda-phy");
> +
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> + __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> + "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> +
> static
> int ufs_qcom_phy_cfg_vreg(struct device *dev,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, bool on)
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:38 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 17:20 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:21 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-26 20:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-26 20:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-29 20:16 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:41 ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:13 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 19:18 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-20 3:44 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:19 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 0:07 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-25 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-25 6:00 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.