From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] security: keys: trusted fix tpm2 authorizations
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 21:48:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b17b2aca2a56be2aace6479e40b763e4ec176d3d.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c03eb4a8aa3627f58bc45bbc23a4dcd660dc6e2f.camel@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 23:45 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-30 at 09:37 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > In TPM 1.2 an authorization was a 20 byte number. The spec actually
> > recommended you to hash variable length passwords and use the sha1
> > hash as the authorization. Because the spec doesn't require this
> > hashing, the current authorization for trusted keys is a 40 digit hex
> > number. For TPM 2.0 the spec allows the passing in of variable length
> > passwords and passphrases directly, so we should allow that in trusted
> > keys for ease of use. Update the 'blobauth' parameter to take this
> > into account, so we can now use plain text passwords for the keys.
> >
> > so before
> >
> > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauthõ72d396fae9206628714fb2ce00f72e94f2258f"
> >
> > after:
> >
> > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle000001"
> >
> > Note this is both and enhancement and a potential bug fix. The TPM
> > 2.0 spec requires us to strip leading zeros, meaning empyty
> > authorization is a zero length HMAC whereas we're currently passing in
> > 20 bytes of zeros. A lot of TPMs simply accept this as OK, but the
> > Microsoft TPM emulator rejects it with TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH, so this patch
> > makes the Microsoft TPM emulator work with trusted keys.
>
> Even if for good reasons, you should be explicit when you make an API
> change that is not backwards compatible.
Also you have illformed abbrevation in your short summary. Should
be TPM2, not tpm2.
/Jarkko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] security: keys: trusted fix tpm2 authorizations
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 23:48:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b17b2aca2a56be2aace6479e40b763e4ec176d3d.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c03eb4a8aa3627f58bc45bbc23a4dcd660dc6e2f.camel@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, 2020-01-06 at 23:45 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-12-30 at 09:37 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > In TPM 1.2 an authorization was a 20 byte number. The spec actually
> > recommended you to hash variable length passwords and use the sha1
> > hash as the authorization. Because the spec doesn't require this
> > hashing, the current authorization for trusted keys is a 40 digit hex
> > number. For TPM 2.0 the spec allows the passing in of variable length
> > passwords and passphrases directly, so we should allow that in trusted
> > keys for ease of use. Update the 'blobauth' parameter to take this
> > into account, so we can now use plain text passwords for the keys.
> >
> > so before
> >
> > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=f572d396fae9206628714fb2ce00f72e94f2258f"
> >
> > after:
> >
> > keyctl add trusted kmk "new 32 blobauth=hello keyhandle=81000001"
> >
> > Note this is both and enhancement and a potential bug fix. The TPM
> > 2.0 spec requires us to strip leading zeros, meaning empyty
> > authorization is a zero length HMAC whereas we're currently passing in
> > 20 bytes of zeros. A lot of TPMs simply accept this as OK, but the
> > Microsoft TPM emulator rejects it with TPM_RC_BAD_AUTH, so this patch
> > makes the Microsoft TPM emulator work with trusted keys.
>
> Even if for good reasons, you should be explicit when you make an API
> change that is not backwards compatible.
Also you have illformed abbrevation in your short summary. Should
be TPM2, not tpm2.
/Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-06 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-30 17:37 [PATCH v4 0/9] TPM 2.0 trusted keys with attached policy James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] lib: add asn.1 encoder James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-06 18:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-06 18:09 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-07 0:17 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-07 0:17 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] oid_registry: Add TCG defined OIDS for TPM keys James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] security: keys: trusted fix tpm2 authorizations James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-06 21:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-06 21:45 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-06 21:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2020-01-06 21:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-07 1:08 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-07 1:08 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-08 16:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-08 16:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 tpm2 key format for the blobs James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-06 21:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-06 21:53 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] security: keys: trusted: Make sealed key properly interoperable James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2020-01-06 21:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-01-06 21:58 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-30 17:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] security: keys: trusted: add PCR policy to TPM2 keys James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:37 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] security: keys: trusted: add ability to specify arbitrary policy James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] security: keys: trusted: implement counter/timer policy James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] security: keys: trusted: add password based authorizations to policy keys James Bottomley
2019-12-30 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2019-12-31 16:05 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] TPM 2.0 trusted keys with attached policy Jarkko Sakkinen
2019-12-31 16:05 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b17b2aca2a56be2aace6479e40b763e4ec176d3d.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.