RE: Perferred way for Patch Submission (inline or attchment)?

RE: Perferred way for Patch Submission (inline or attchment)?

[Ian Pratt]

 

> I'm wondering do you guys prefer we submit patches as attachments or
> inline them in the email? Inline in emails have become the standard
> everywhere else, what is the preferred way you guys would like patches
> submitted to the list.... inline or attachments?

Inline in emails is probably best, but I personally don't have a strong
opinion. We just use the bktools package to extract them.

I haven't found a good way of keeping any per-file comments with the
files, but I think Christian has some magic script that's able to
extract and check these in too.

Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

Re: Perferred way for Patch Submission (inline or attchment)?

[Kip Macy]

I like to post patches as links because the patches can be very large
and I like to know how many people are looking at them.  For example
I've had 13 accesses to my recent ptrace patch. Granted, its not a /.,
but it does tell me that people are actually using or thinking about
using the domu_debug code.

Is this OK going forward?


        -Kip


On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:30:32 -0000, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I'm wondering do you guys prefer we submit patches as attachments or
> > inline them in the email? Inline in emails have become the standard
> > everywhere else, what is the preferred way you guys would like patches
> > submitted to the list.... inline or attachments?
> 
> Inline in emails is probably best, but I personally don't have a strong
> opinion. We just use the bktools package to extract them.
> 
> I haven't found a good way of keeping any per-file comments with the
> files, but I think Christian has some magic script that's able to
> extract and check these in too.
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&opclick
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

Perferred way for Patch Submission (inline or attchment)?

[Jerone Young]

I'm wondering do you guys prefer we submit patches as attachments or
inline them in the email? Inline in emails have become the standard
everywhere else, what is the preferred way you guys would like patches
submitted to the list.... inline or attachments?
-- 
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@us.ibm.com
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click