Re: [PATCH v12 2/6] dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition

[Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>]

On 30/01/2023 11:40, Balsam CHIHI wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Thank you for the feedback.
> 
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:48 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/01/2023 17:10, bchihi@baylibre.com wrote:
>>> From: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@baylibre.com>
>>>
>>> Add LVTS thermal controllers dt-binding definition for mt8195.
>>
>> Subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-binding definition". The
>> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
> 
> fixed.
> The patch title has been fixed as you suggested :
> "dt-bindings: thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS thermal controllers"
> 
>>
>> Plus two comments at the end.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>>    v12:
>>>       - Fixed subject prefix
>>>       - Fixed licences GPL-2.0+ to GPL-2.0
>>>       - Added dual licenses
>>
>>
>>> +    };
>>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..902d5b1e4f43
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h
>>
>> Same filename as bindings.
> 
> fixed.
> rename :
> include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts.h =>
> include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek-lvts-thermal.h
> 

I think it should be
include/dt-bindings/thermal/mediatek,lvts-thermal.yaml

Regards,
Matthias

>>
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT) */
>>
>> Although this is correct, any reason why not using exactly the same
>> license as bindings?
> 
> fixed.
> both files are now using the same license :
> "SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 or MIT)"
> 
>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copyright (c) 2023 MediaTek Inc.
>>> + * Author: Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@baylibre.com>
>>> + */
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> I'll send the changes soon.
> 
> Best regards,
> Balsam