From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID 5 performance problems
Date: 4 Apr 2003 12:39:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6kqhc$2u8$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.GSO.4.30.0304030858080.20118-100000@multivac.sdsc.edu
Followup to: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0304030858080.20118-100000@multivac.sdsc.edu>
By author: "Peter L. Ashford" <ashford@sdsc.edu>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> The ONLY reason that I can think of to use round cables would be for
> looks. From a performance or reliability standpoint, they are a waste of
> money. I routinely build systems with dual 8-channel IDE RAID cards
> (3Ware 7500-8) and 16 disks, and ONLY use flat cables.
>
In some chassis they make routing cables a lot easier. In others,
they make it harder.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-04 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-03 15:45 RAID 5 performance problems Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 15:45 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 18:05 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 18:05 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 18:47 ` Ross Vandegrift
2003-04-03 19:22 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 19:20 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-03 21:02 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-03 21:25 ` Stephan van Hienen
2003-04-03 21:38 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 21:38 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 22:09 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:09 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:16 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:16 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:28 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 22:28 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 21:42 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 21:42 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 22:13 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-03 22:13 ` Peter L. Ashford
2003-04-04 20:39 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2003-04-03 21:06 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-04-03 21:14 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 21:14 ` Jonathan Vardy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-03 19:13 Neil Schemenauer
2003-04-03 19:49 Andy Arvai
2003-04-03 20:25 ` Mike Dresser
2003-04-03 20:25 ` Mike Dresser
2003-04-03 21:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 21:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-03 21:31 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-03 20:10 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-04 11:44 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 11:44 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 14:39 ` Ezra Nugroho
2003-04-04 15:05 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 15:05 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 16:01 Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-04 16:01 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-05 0:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
2003-04-05 0:10 ` Jonathan Vardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b6kqhc$2u8$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.