All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:40:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7cd5217-e7dc-4b57-aab2-bef1b78dca7d@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240209183128.10273-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>



On 2/9/24 12:31, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
> 
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm7038_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
> 
> struct bcm7038_l1_cpu {
> 	void __iomem	*map_base;
> 	u32		mask_cache[];
> };
> 
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
> 
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>

LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks
-- 
Gustavo

> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> index 24ca1d656adc..36e71af054e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> 
> -	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
> +	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(struct_size(cpu, mask_cache, n_words),
>   					GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!cpu)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.25.1
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Broadcom internal kernel review list
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 12:40:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7cd5217-e7dc-4b57-aab2-bef1b78dca7d@embeddedor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240209183128.10273-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>



On 2/9/24 12:31, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
> 
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm7038_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
> 
> struct bcm7038_l1_cpu {
> 	void __iomem	*map_base;
> 	u32		mask_cache[];
> };
> 
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
> 
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
> 
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>

LGTM:

Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Thanks
-- 
Gustavo

> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> index 24ca1d656adc..36e71af054e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
> @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static int __init bcm7038_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> 
> -	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
> +	cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(struct_size(cpu, mask_cache, n_words),
>   					GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!cpu)
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.25.1
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-09 18:31 [PATCH] irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:31 ` Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:40 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva [this message]
2024-02-09 18:40   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2024-02-10  0:20 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10  0:20   ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10  1:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-10  1:21   ` Florian Fainelli
2024-02-13  9:56 ` [tip: irq/core] " tip-bot2 for Erick Archer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b7cd5217-e7dc-4b57-aab2-bef1b78dca7d@embeddedor.com \
    --to=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.