From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Yuri Andriaccio" <yurand2000@gmail.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Juri Lelli" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Valentin Schneider" <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Yuri Andriaccio <yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 00/25] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 10:38:54 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcedd13fc22cb7ba590791a4c1387ecc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608121546.69910-1-yurand2000@gmail.com>
Hello,
Looks great. Two things:
1. cpu.rt.internal doesn't follow the naming convention. The file is the
cgroup's own budget (cpu.rt.max minus its children), so
cpu.rt.max.effective.local fits better: .effective like
cpuset.cpus.effective, .local like memory.events.local.
2. root's cpu.rt.max: sched_rt_runtime_us already caps total DL/RT
bandwidth and rt-cgroups admit against the same pool, so what does
reserving the cgroup share separately at root add? It's also a writable
control on root, which we otherwise keep off root.
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 12:15 [RFC PATCH v6 00/25] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 01/25] sched/deadline: Fix replenishment logic for non-deferred servers Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 02/25] sched/rt: Update default bandwidth for real-time tasks to ONE Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 03/25] sched/deadline: Do not access dl_se->rq directly Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 04/25] sched/deadline: Distinguish between dl_rq and my_q Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 05/25] sched/rt: Pass an rt_rq instead of an rq where needed Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 06/25] sched/rt: Move functions from rt.c to sched.h Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 07/25] sched/rt: Disable RT_GROUP_SCHED Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 08/25] sched/rt: Remove unnecessary runqueue pointer in struct rt_rq Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 09/25] sched/rt: Introduce HCBS specific structs in task_group Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 10/25] sched/core: Initialize HCBS specific structures Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 11/25] sched/deadline: Add dl_init_tg Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 12/25] sched/rt: Add {alloc/unregister/free}_rt_sched_group Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-11 8:42 ` Juri Lelli
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 13/25] sched/deadline: Account rt-cgroups bandwidth in deadline tasks schedulability tests Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 14/25] sched/rt: Implement dl-server operations for rt-cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 15/25] sched/rt: Update task event callbacks for HCBS scheduling Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 16/25] sched/rt: Remove support for cgroups-v1 Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 17/25] sched/rt: Update rt-cgroup schedulability checks Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 18/25] sched/rt: Update task's RT runqueue when switching scheduling class Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 19/25] sched/rt: Remove old RT_GROUP_SCHED data structures Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 20/25] sched/rt: Add HCBS migration code to related functions Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 21/25] sched/rt: Hook HCBS migration functions Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 22/25] sched/core: Execute enqueued balance callbacks when changing allowed CPUs Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 23/25] sched/rt: Try pull task on empty server pick Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 24/25] sched/core: Execute enqueued balance callbacks after migrate_disable_switch Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-08 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH v6 25/25] Documentation: Update documentation for real-time cgroups Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-09 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH v6 00/25] Hierarchical Constant Bandwidth Server Juri Lelli
2026-06-09 16:23 ` Yuri Andriaccio
2026-06-10 9:21 ` Juri Lelli
2026-06-15 20:38 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bcedd13fc22cb7ba590791a4c1387ecc@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yurand2000@gmail.com \
--cc=yuri.andriaccio@santannapisa.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.