* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer Geliang Tang
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
v5:
- re-check for TCP_CLOSE.
- add a new helper mptcp_check_mp_fail_response().
- add two timers cleanup patches.
v4:
- start and stop sk_timer instead of setting and clearing msk->flags.
- add a new patch.
v3:
- use msk->sk_timer and a msk->flags bit.
- use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for subflow->mp_fail_response_expect.
- update selftest.
v2:
- don't clear mp_fail_response_expect flag.
- add a helper mp_fail_response_expect_subflow to get the subflow,
instead of using msk->first.
- add locks as Mat suggested.
- add a selftest.
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/261
Geliang Tang (6):
mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer
mptcp: add data lock for sk timers
mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support
mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond
selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs
selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr
net/mptcp/pm.c | 18 +++++-
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 13 ++++
.../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 49 ++++++++++++--
5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/6] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers Geliang Tang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
Use the helper mptcp_stop_timer() instead of using sk_stop_timer() to
stop icsk_retransmit_timer directly.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 3cb975227d12..90c2febe72cb 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2756,7 +2756,7 @@ static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
/* join list will be eventually flushed (with rst) at sock lock release time*/
list_splice_init(&msk->conn_list, &conn_list);
- sk_stop_timer(sk, &msk->sk.icsk_retransmit_timer);
+ mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
msk->pm.status = 0;
@@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
__mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow, MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE);
}
- sk_stop_timer(sk, &msk->sk.icsk_retransmit_timer);
+ mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
if (mptcp_sk(sk)->token)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/6] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/6] mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support Geliang Tang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
mptcp_data_lock() needs to be held when manipulating the msk
retransmit_timer or the sk sk_timer. This patch adds the data
lock for the both timers.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 90c2febe72cb..483f4d4e8e87 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1604,8 +1604,10 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
out:
/* ensure the rtx timer is running */
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
if (copied)
__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
}
@@ -2490,8 +2492,10 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
reset_timer:
mptcp_check_and_set_pending(sk);
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -2654,8 +2658,10 @@ void mptcp_subflow_shutdown(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, int how)
} else {
pr_debug("Sending DATA_FIN on subflow %p", ssk);
tcp_send_ack(ssk);
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
if (!mptcp_timer_pending(sk))
mptcp_reset_timer(sk);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
break;
}
@@ -2756,8 +2762,10 @@ static void __mptcp_destroy_sock(struct sock *sk)
/* join list will be eventually flushed (with rst) at sock lock release time*/
list_splice_init(&msk->conn_list, &conn_list);
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
msk->pm.status = 0;
/* clears msk->subflow, allowing the following loop to close
@@ -2819,7 +2827,9 @@ static void mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
__mptcp_destroy_sock(sk);
do_cancel_work = true;
} else {
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
sk_reset_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer, jiffies + TCP_TIMEWAIT_LEN);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
release_sock(sk);
if (do_cancel_work)
@@ -2864,8 +2874,10 @@ static int mptcp_disconnect(struct sock *sk, int flags)
__mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow, MPTCP_CF_FASTCLOSE);
}
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
mptcp_stop_timer(sk);
sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
if (mptcp_sk(sk)->token)
mptcp_event(MPTCP_EVENT_CLOSED, mptcp_sk(sk), NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/6] mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/6] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 4/6] mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond Geliang Tang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
This patch added a new struct member mp_fail_response_expect in struct
mptcp_subflow_context to support MP_FAIL response. In the single subflow
with checksum error and contiguous data special case, a MP_FAIL sent in
response to another MP_FAIL.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 10 +++++++++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index d0d31d5c198a..f5f4561f332a 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -279,8 +279,16 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_fail_received(struct sock *sk, u64 fail_seq)
pr_debug("fail_seq=%llu", fail_seq);
- if (!mptcp_has_another_subflow(sk) && READ_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback))
+ if (mptcp_has_another_subflow(sk) || !READ_ONCE(msk->allow_infinite_fallback))
+ return;
+
+ if (!READ_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect)) {
+ pr_debug("send MP_FAIL response and infinite map");
+
+ subflow->send_mp_fail = 1;
+ MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_MPFAILTX);
subflow->send_infinite_map = 1;
+ }
}
/* path manager helpers */
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index c8bada4537e2..83f0205f0d95 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
stale : 1, /* unable to snd/rcv data, do not use for xmit */
local_id_valid : 1; /* local_id is correctly initialized */
enum mptcp_data_avail data_avail;
+ bool mp_fail_response_expect;
u32 remote_nonce;
u64 thmac;
u32 local_nonce;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index 30ffb00661bb..ca2352ad20d4 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -1217,6 +1217,8 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
tcp_send_active_reset(ssk, GFP_ATOMIC);
while ((skb = skb_peek(&ssk->sk_receive_queue)))
sk_eat_skb(ssk, skb);
+ } else {
+ WRITE_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect, true);
}
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_avail, MPTCP_SUBFLOW_NODATA);
return true;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 4/6] mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/6] mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/6] selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs Geliang Tang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
This patch added a new msk->flags bit MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, then reused
sk_timer to trigger a check if we have not received a response from the
peer after sending MP_FAIL. If the peer doesn't respond properly, reset
the subflow.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 8 ++++++++
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 +
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 11 ++++++++++
4 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm.c b/net/mptcp/pm.c
index f5f4561f332a..cbd6f90ffbac 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_fail_received(struct sock *sk, u64 fail_seq)
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
+ struct sock *s = (struct sock *)msk;
pr_debug("fail_seq=%llu", fail_seq);
@@ -288,6 +289,13 @@ void mptcp_pm_mp_fail_received(struct sock *sk, u64 fail_seq)
subflow->send_mp_fail = 1;
MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_MPFAILTX);
subflow->send_infinite_map = 1;
+ } else if (s && inet_sk_state_load(s) != TCP_CLOSE) {
+ pr_debug("MP_FAIL response received");
+
+ mptcp_data_lock(s);
+ if (inet_sk_state_load(s) != TCP_CLOSE)
+ sk_stop_timer(s, &s->sk_timer);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(s);
}
}
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 483f4d4e8e87..0e10bce5f7f1 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -2168,10 +2168,38 @@ static void mptcp_retransmit_timer(struct timer_list *t)
sock_put(sk);
}
+static struct mptcp_subflow_context *
+mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *ret = NULL;
+
+ mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+ if (READ_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect)) {
+ ret = subflow;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void mptcp_check_mp_fail_response(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+
+ bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ subflow = mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(msk);
+ if (subflow)
+ __set_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags);
+ bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+}
+
static void mptcp_timeout_timer(struct timer_list *t)
{
struct sock *sk = from_timer(sk, t, sk_timer);
+ mptcp_check_mp_fail_response(mptcp_sk(sk));
mptcp_schedule_work(sk);
sock_put(sk);
}
@@ -2498,6 +2526,23 @@ static void __mptcp_retrans(struct sock *sk)
mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
}
+static void mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+ struct sock *ssk;
+ bool slow;
+
+ subflow = mp_fail_response_expect_subflow(msk);
+ if (subflow) {
+ pr_debug("MP_FAIL doesn't respond, reset the subflow");
+
+ ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
+ mptcp_subflow_reset(ssk);
+ unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
+ }
+}
+
static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct mptcp_sock *msk = container_of(work, struct mptcp_sock, work);
@@ -2538,6 +2583,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work)
if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags))
__mptcp_retrans(sk);
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE, &msk->flags))
+ mptcp_mp_fail_no_response(msk);
+
unlock:
release_sock(sk);
sock_put(sk);
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 83f0205f0d95..bf58d3c886f5 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
#define MPTCP_WORK_EOF 3
#define MPTCP_FALLBACK_DONE 4
#define MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW 5
+#define MPTCP_FAIL_NO_RESPONSE 6
/* MPTCP socket release cb flags */
#define MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING 1
diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
index ca2352ad20d4..75c824b67ca9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c
@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ static enum mapping_status get_mapping_status(struct sock *ssk,
{
struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
bool csum_reqd = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled);
+ struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
struct mptcp_ext *mpext;
struct sk_buff *skb;
u16 data_len;
@@ -1009,6 +1010,12 @@ static enum mapping_status get_mapping_status(struct sock *ssk,
pr_debug("infinite mapping received");
MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_INFINITEMAPRX);
subflow->map_data_len = 0;
+ if (sk && inet_sk_state_load(sk) != TCP_CLOSE) {
+ mptcp_data_lock(sk);
+ if (inet_sk_state_load(sk) != TCP_CLOSE)
+ sk_stop_timer(sk, &sk->sk_timer);
+ mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
+ }
return MAPPING_INVALID;
}
@@ -1219,6 +1226,10 @@ static bool subflow_check_data_avail(struct sock *ssk)
sk_eat_skb(ssk, skb);
} else {
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->mp_fail_response_expect, true);
+ /* The data lock is acquired in __mptcp_move_skbs() */
+ sk_reset_timer((struct sock *)msk,
+ &((struct sock *)msk)->sk_timer,
+ jiffies + TCP_RTO_MAX);
}
WRITE_ONCE(subflow->data_avail, MPTCP_SUBFLOW_NODATA);
return true;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/6] selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 4/6] mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr Geliang Tang
2022-03-17 0:20 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Mat Martineau
6 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
This patch extended chk_fail_nr to check the MP_FAIL response mibs.
Added a new argument invert for chk_fail_nr to allow it can check the
MP_FAIL TX and RX mibs from the opposite direction.
When the infinite map was received before the MP_FAIL response, the
response will be lost. A '-' can be added into fail_tx or fail_rx to
represent that MP_FAIL response TX or RX can be lost when doing the
checks.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 38 +++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
index 959e46122a84..2b77576d773c 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
@@ -1055,13 +1055,38 @@ chk_fail_nr()
{
local fail_tx=$1
local fail_rx=$2
+ local ns_invert=${3:-""}
local count
local dump_stats
+ local ns_tx=$ns1
+ local ns_rx=$ns2
+ local extra_msg=""
+ local allow_tx_lost=0
+ local allow_rx_lost=0
+
+ if [[ $ns_invert = "invert" ]]; then
+ ns_tx=$ns2
+ ns_rx=$ns1
+ extra_msg=" invert"
+ fi
+
+ if [[ "${fail_tx}" = "-"* ]]; then
+ allow_tx_lost=1
+ fail_tx=${fail_tx:1}
+ fi
+ if [[ "${fail_rx}" = "-"* ]]; then
+ allow_rx_lost=1
+ fail_rx=${fail_rx:1}
+ fi
printf "%-${nr_blank}s %s" " " "ftx"
- count=$(ip netns exec $ns1 nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtMPFailTx | awk '{print $2}')
+ count=$(ip netns exec $ns_tx nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtMPFailTx | awk '{print $2}')
[ -z "$count" ] && count=0
if [ "$count" != "$fail_tx" ]; then
+ extra_msg="$extra_msg,tx=$count"
+ fi
+ if { [ "$count" != "$fail_tx" ] && [ $allow_tx_lost -eq 0 ]; } ||
+ { [ "$count" -gt "$fail_tx" ] && [ $allow_tx_lost -eq 1 ]; }; then
echo "[fail] got $count MP_FAIL[s] TX expected $fail_tx"
fail_test
dump_stats=1
@@ -1070,17 +1095,23 @@ chk_fail_nr()
fi
echo -n " - failrx"
- count=$(ip netns exec $ns2 nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtMPFailRx | awk '{print $2}')
+ count=$(ip netns exec $ns_rx nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtMPFailRx | awk '{print $2}')
[ -z "$count" ] && count=0
if [ "$count" != "$fail_rx" ]; then
+ extra_msg="$extra_msg,rx=$count"
+ fi
+ if { [ "$count" != "$fail_rx" ] && [ $allow_rx_lost -eq 0 ]; } ||
+ { [ "$count" -gt "$fail_rx" ] && [ $allow_rx_lost -eq 1 ]; }; then
echo "[fail] got $count MP_FAIL[s] RX expected $fail_rx"
fail_test
dump_stats=1
else
- echo "[ ok ]"
+ echo -n "[ ok ]"
fi
[ "${dump_stats}" = 1 ] && dump_stats
+
+ echo "$extra_msg"
}
chk_fclose_nr()
@@ -2672,6 +2703,7 @@ fail_tests()
if reset_with_fail "Infinite map" 1; then
run_tests $ns1 $ns2 10.0.1.1 128
chk_join_nr 0 0 0 +1 +0 1 0 1 "$(pedit_action_pkts)"
+ chk_fail_nr 1 -1 invert
fi
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/6] selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 6:58 ` Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 8:08 ` selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-03-17 0:20 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Mat Martineau
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Geliang Tang @ 2022-03-15 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Geliang Tang
When the multiple checksum errors occur in chk_csum_nr(), print the
numbers of the errors as an extra message.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 11 ++++++++++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
index 2b77576d773c..375b087edc7b 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh
@@ -1014,6 +1014,7 @@ chk_csum_nr()
local csum_ns2=${2:-0}
local count
local dump_stats
+ local extra_msg=""
local allow_multi_errors_ns1=0
local allow_multi_errors_ns2=0
@@ -1029,6 +1030,9 @@ chk_csum_nr()
printf "%-${nr_blank}s %s" " " "sum"
count=$(ip netns exec $ns1 nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtDataCsumErr | awk '{print $2}')
[ -z "$count" ] && count=0
+ if [ "$count" != "$csum_ns1" ]; then
+ extra_msg="$extra_msg ns1=$count"
+ fi
if { [ "$count" != $csum_ns1 ] && [ $allow_multi_errors_ns1 -eq 0 ]; } ||
{ [ "$count" -lt $csum_ns1 ] && [ $allow_multi_errors_ns1 -eq 1 ]; }; then
echo "[fail] got $count data checksum error[s] expected $csum_ns1"
@@ -1040,15 +1044,20 @@ chk_csum_nr()
echo -n " - csum "
count=$(ip netns exec $ns2 nstat -as | grep MPTcpExtDataCsumErr | awk '{print $2}')
[ -z "$count" ] && count=0
+ if [ "$count" != "$csum_ns2" ]; then
+ extra_msg="$extra_msg ns2=$count"
+ fi
if { [ "$count" != $csum_ns2 ] && [ $allow_multi_errors_ns2 -eq 0 ]; } ||
{ [ "$count" -lt $csum_ns2 ] && [ $allow_multi_errors_ns2 -eq 1 ]; }; then
echo "[fail] got $count data checksum error[s] expected $csum_ns2"
fail_test
dump_stats=1
else
- echo "[ ok ]"
+ echo -n "[ ok ]"
fi
[ "${dump_stats}" = 1 ] && dump_stats
+
+ echo "$extra_msg"
}
chk_fail_nr()
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr: Tests Results
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-15 8:08 ` MPTCP CI
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: MPTCP CI @ 2022-03-15 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Geliang,
Thank you for your modifications, that's great!
Our CI did some validations and here is its report:
- KVM Validation: normal:
- Success! ✅:
- Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6750472991145984
- Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6750472991145984/summary/summary.txt
- KVM Validation: debug:
- Unstable: 1 failed test(s): selftest_mptcp_join 🔴:
- Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4511867316994048
- Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4511867316994048/summary/summary.txt
Initiator: Patchew Applier
Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/3d584c2de1fc
Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a
stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some
reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to
help us improve that ;-)
Cheers,
MPTCP GH Action bot
Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr Geliang Tang
@ 2022-03-17 0:20 ` Mat Martineau
2022-03-18 23:19 ` Mat Martineau
6 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2022-03-17 0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:
> v5:
> - re-check for TCP_CLOSE.
> - add a new helper mptcp_check_mp_fail_response().
> - add two timers cleanup patches.
>
Hi Geliang -
v5 is looking good to me so far, but I still need to run some tests.
Thanks,
Mat
> v4:
> - start and stop sk_timer instead of setting and clearing msk->flags.
> - add a new patch.
>
> v3:
> - use msk->sk_timer and a msk->flags bit.
> - use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for subflow->mp_fail_response_expect.
> - update selftest.
>
> v2:
> - don't clear mp_fail_response_expect flag.
> - add a helper mp_fail_response_expect_subflow to get the subflow,
> instead of using msk->first.
> - add locks as Mat suggested.
> - add a selftest.
>
> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/261
>
> Geliang Tang (6):
> mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer
> mptcp: add data lock for sk timers
> mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support
> mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond
> selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs
> selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr
>
> net/mptcp/pm.c | 18 +++++-
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +
> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 13 ++++
> .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 49 ++++++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans
2022-03-17 0:20 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Mat Martineau
@ 2022-03-18 23:19 ` Mat Martineau
2022-03-23 17:10 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2022-03-18 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp
On Wed, 16 Mar 2022, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:
>
>> v5:
>> - re-check for TCP_CLOSE.
>> - add a new helper mptcp_check_mp_fail_response().
>> - add two timers cleanup patches.
>>
>
> Hi Geliang -
>
> v5 is looking good to me so far, but I still need to run some tests.
>
Ok, I got a chance to look at the packet traces from the self tests. I
also tested with a shorter timeout and commented out the echo, and the
subflow was reset as expected.
Looks good for the export branch:
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
It would be good to have a packetdrill test for this, even if it does take
a couple of minutes to fail. We wouldn't have to run it in the normal CI.
Mat
>
>> v4:
>> - start and stop sk_timer instead of setting and clearing msk->flags.
>> - add a new patch.
>>
>> v3:
>> - use msk->sk_timer and a msk->flags bit.
>> - use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE for subflow->mp_fail_response_expect.
>> - update selftest.
>>
>> v2:
>> - don't clear mp_fail_response_expect flag.
>> - add a helper mp_fail_response_expect_subflow to get the subflow,
>> instead of using msk->first.
>> - add locks as Mat suggested.
>> - add a selftest.
>>
>> Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/261
>>
>> Geliang Tang (6):
>> mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer
>> mptcp: add data lock for sk timers
>> mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support
>> mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond
>> selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs
>> selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr
>>
>> net/mptcp/pm.c | 18 +++++-
>> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++-
>> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 2 +
>> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 13 ++++
>> .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 49 ++++++++++++--
>> 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Mat Martineau
> Intel
>
>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans
2022-03-18 23:19 ` Mat Martineau
@ 2022-03-23 17:10 ` Matthieu Baerts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2022-03-23 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mat Martineau, Geliang Tang; +Cc: mptcp
Hi Geliang, Mat,
On 19/03/2022 00:19, Mat Martineau wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022, Mat Martineau wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Geliang Tang wrote:
>>
>>> v5:
>>> - re-check for TCP_CLOSE.
>>> - add a new helper mptcp_check_mp_fail_response().
>>> - add two timers cleanup patches.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Geliang -
>>
>> v5 is looking good to me so far, but I still need to run some tests.
>>
>
> Ok, I got a chance to look at the packet traces from the self tests. I
> also tested with a shorter timeout and commented out the echo, and the
> subflow was reset as expected.
>
> Looks good for the export branch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
With a bit of delay, sorry for that, these patches are now in our tree!
Thank you for the patches and the reviews!
New patches for t/upstream:
- cf0e4660d69e: mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer
- 4afa5bc41699: mptcp: add data lock for sk timers
- d1919f72133d: mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support
- bb04e167b541: mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond
- 735b7655b253: selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs
- 054951083391: selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr
- Results: b3fcb6331ff3..73b94fb27a8c (export)
Builds and tests are now in progress:
https://cirrus-ci.com/github/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/export/20220323T170824
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/workflows/build-validation.yml?query=branch:export
> It would be good to have a packetdrill test for this, even if it does
> take a couple of minutes to fail. We wouldn't have to run it in the
> normal CI.
I didn't close #261 for this reason then.
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/261
Cheers,
Matt
--
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-23 17:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-03-15 6:58 [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: use mptcp_stop_timer Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/6] mptcp: add data lock for sk timers Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/6] mptcp: add MP_FAIL response support Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 4/6] mptcp: reset subflow when MP_FAIL doesn't respond Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/6] selftests: mptcp: check MP_FAIL response mibs Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 6:58 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr Geliang Tang
2022-03-15 8:08 ` selftests: mptcp: print extra msg in chk_csum_nr: Tests Results MPTCP CI
2022-03-17 0:20 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] MP_FAIL echo and retrans Mat Martineau
2022-03-18 23:19 ` Mat Martineau
2022-03-23 17:10 ` Matthieu Baerts
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.