* [DPDK/core Bug 1882] volatile not needed with atomics
@ 2026-02-17 3:46 bugzilla
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2026-02-17 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
http://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882
Bug ID: 1882
Summary: volatile not needed with atomics
Product: DPDK
Version: 25.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: core
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: amardeepjk@gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
When we use atomic in c why are we using volatile.
Is it just for old compilers/ pre c11 versions?
typedef struct __rte_capability("spinlock") {
volatile RTE_ATOMIC(int) locked; /**< lock status 0 = unlocked, 1 =
locked */
} rte_spinlock_t;
Can i raise a patch to remove it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-02-17 3:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-17 3:46 [DPDK/core Bug 1882] volatile not needed with atomics bugzilla
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.