From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [DPDK/ethdev Bug 2051] BPF inuse counter is not safe when using lockfree transmit
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:14:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-2051-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2051
Bug ID: 2051
Summary: BPF inuse counter is not safe when using lockfree
transmit
Product: DPDK
Version: 26.11
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: Normal
Component: ethdev
Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
Reporter: stephen@networkplumber.org
Target Milestone: ---
The BPF ethdev callbacks (lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c) guard cbi->bpf and cbi->jit
with a seqcount: bpf_eth_cbi_inuse() makes cbi->use odd,
bpf_eth_cbi_unuse() makes it even, and bpf_eth_cbi_wait() treats even as
"no thread is inside the callback". This is only valid with one thread
at a time in the callback for a given port/queue.
With RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE, multiple threads may call
rte_eth_tx_burst() on the same queue concurrently, so the tx callbacks
(bpf_tx_callback_vm/jit/mb_vm/mb_jit) run concurrently on the same cbi.
1. Parity. Two threads pass bpf_eth_cbi_inuse() and see cb != NULL; the
count is even. rte_bpf_eth_tx_unload() clears cb, bpf_eth_cbi_wait()
samples an even count and returns, and rte_bpf_destroy() frees the
program and JIT code while both threads are executing it.
Use after free.
2. Lost update. In the default build (enable_stdatomic=false) cbi->use++
is a non-atomic read-modify-write. Concurrent increments can lose
one, which inverts the parity permanently. An idle queue then reads
odd, so bpf_eth_cbi_wait() spins until the next burst (forever if
there is none), and afterwards even means in use, which leads back
to case 1 with a single thread.
Rx is not affected; rx burst on a queue is never MT safe.
Nothing in rte_bpf_eth_tx_install() or rte_bpf_eth_tx_elf_load() checks
for the offload, and the restriction is not documented.
lib/pdump has the same pattern (pdump_cb_hold/pdump_cb_release/
pdump_cb_wait on use_count, used by pdump_tx) and the same problem.
Found by inspection while reviewing the conversion of rte_smp_mb() to
C11 fences. Not reproduced.
Possible fixes:
- Fail tx install with -ENOTSUP when MT_LOCKFREE is enabled on the
port or queue, and document it.
- Replace the seqcount with a real reference count (atomic add/sub,
wait for zero, keep the cb check). Costs two locked operations per
burst.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-2051-3@https.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
--to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.