All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [DPDK/ethdev Bug 2051] BPF inuse counter is not safe when using lockfree transmit
@ 2026-10-08 22:14 bugzilla
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: bugzilla @ 2026-10-08 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev

https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2051

            Bug ID: 2051
           Summary: BPF inuse counter is not safe when using lockfree
                    transmit
           Product: DPDK
           Version: 26.11
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: ethdev
          Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
          Reporter: stephen@networkplumber.org
  Target Milestone: ---

The BPF ethdev callbacks (lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c) guard cbi->bpf and cbi->jit
with a seqcount: bpf_eth_cbi_inuse() makes cbi->use odd,
bpf_eth_cbi_unuse() makes it even, and bpf_eth_cbi_wait() treats even as
"no thread is inside the callback". This is only valid with one thread
at a time in the callback for a given port/queue.

With RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_MT_LOCKFREE, multiple threads may call
rte_eth_tx_burst() on the same queue concurrently, so the tx callbacks
(bpf_tx_callback_vm/jit/mb_vm/mb_jit) run concurrently on the same cbi.

1. Parity. Two threads pass bpf_eth_cbi_inuse() and see cb != NULL; the
   count is even. rte_bpf_eth_tx_unload() clears cb, bpf_eth_cbi_wait()
   samples an even count and returns, and rte_bpf_destroy() frees the
   program and JIT code while both threads are executing it.
   Use after free.

2. Lost update. In the default build (enable_stdatomic=false) cbi->use++
   is a non-atomic read-modify-write. Concurrent increments can lose
   one, which inverts the parity permanently. An idle queue then reads
   odd, so bpf_eth_cbi_wait() spins until the next burst (forever if
   there is none), and afterwards even means in use, which leads back
   to case 1 with a single thread.

Rx is not affected; rx burst on a queue is never MT safe.

Nothing in rte_bpf_eth_tx_install() or rte_bpf_eth_tx_elf_load() checks
for the offload, and the restriction is not documented.

lib/pdump has the same pattern (pdump_cb_hold/pdump_cb_release/
pdump_cb_wait on use_count, used by pdump_tx) and the same problem.

Found by inspection while reviewing the conversion of rte_smp_mb() to
C11 fences. Not reproduced.

Possible fixes:
 - Fail tx install with -ENOTSUP when MT_LOCKFREE is enabled on the
   port or queue, and document it.
 - Replace the seqcount with a real reference count (atomic add/sub,
   wait for zero, keep the cb check). Costs two locked operations per
   burst.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2026-10-08 22:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-08 22:14 [DPDK/ethdev Bug 2051] BPF inuse counter is not safe when using lockfree transmit bugzilla

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.