All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 215848] New: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:05:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215848

            Bug ID: 215848
           Summary: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
           Product: Documentation
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: man-pages
          Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
          Reporter: rootkea@gmail.com
        Regression: No

Hello!

From fopen(3):
"Therefore it is good practice (and indeed sometimes necessary under Linux) to
put an fseek(3) or fgetpos(3) operation between write and read operations on
such a stream."

I am not sure about the origin of this good practice but fgetpos(3) seems
wrong. It has to be fsetpos(3) if I'm reading the C standard and POSIX[0]
correctly.

BTW, calling fsetpos(3) will require a call to fgetpos(3) first. So why is it
being advised as a good practice to call two functions (`fgetpos` and then
`fsetpos`)? Maybe just i) mention fseek(3) only OR ii) mention fseek(3) and
fflush(3) (instead of fsetpos(3))?

[0]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/functions/fopen.html

Thanks!

Regards,
Avinash Sonawane (rootKea)
https://www.rootkea.me

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-17 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-17 17:05 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2022-04-18  3:32 ` [Bug 215848] fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion bugzilla-daemon
2022-05-14 12:37 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.