From: bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org
To: linux-man@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 215848] New: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 17:05:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215848
Bug ID: 215848
Summary: fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: rootkea@gmail.com
Regression: No
Hello!
From fopen(3):
"Therefore it is good practice (and indeed sometimes necessary under Linux) to
put an fseek(3) or fgetpos(3) operation between write and read operations on
such a stream."
I am not sure about the origin of this good practice but fgetpos(3) seems
wrong. It has to be fsetpos(3) if I'm reading the C standard and POSIX[0]
correctly.
BTW, calling fsetpos(3) will require a call to fgetpos(3) first. So why is it
being advised as a good practice to call two functions (`fgetpos` and then
`fsetpos`)? Maybe just i) mention fseek(3) only OR ii) mention fseek(3) and
fflush(3) (instead of fsetpos(3))?
[0]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799.2018edition/functions/fopen.html
Thanks!
Regards,
Avinash Sonawane (rootKea)
https://www.rootkea.me
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
next reply other threads:[~2022-04-17 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-17 17:05 bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2022-04-18 3:32 ` [Bug 215848] fopen(3): Incorrect good practice suggestion bugzilla-daemon
2022-05-14 12:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-215848-11311@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.