* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-20 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 5:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (24 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-20 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |W_Armin@gmx.de
--- Comment #1 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
Does the asus-wmi driver even load with kernel 6.12?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-20 21:19 ` [Bug 219517] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 5:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 5:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (23 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #2 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Hi Armin
Yes, the asus-wmi driver loads, but the asus-nb-wmi driver fails with error 5.
Here is the relevant dmesg:
dmesg|grep asus
[ 18.552935] asus_wmi: ASUS WMI generic driver loaded
[ 18.570919] asus_wmi: Initialization: 0x1
[ 18.572730] asus_wmi: SFUN value: 0x21
[ 18.572746] asus-nb-wmi asus-nb-wmi: Detected ATK, not ASUSWMI, use DSTS
[ 18.619578] asus_wmi: Failed to set throttle thermal policy (retval): 0x0
[ 18.619584] asus_wmi: Failed to set default thermal profile
[ 18.619589] asus-nb-wmi asus-nb-wmi: probe with driver asus-nb-wmi failed
with error -5
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-20 21:19 ` [Bug 219517] " bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 5:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 5:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 6:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (22 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #3 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
As a comparison, here's the dmesg from an earlier kernel with working
asus-nb-wmi:
❯ dmesg|grep asus
[ 14.268902] asus_wmi: ASUS WMI generic driver loaded
[ 14.283569] asus_wmi: Initialization: 0x1
[ 14.284980] asus_wmi: SFUN value: 0x21
[ 14.284993] asus-nb-wmi asus-nb-wmi: Detected ATK, not ASUSWMI, use DSTS
[ 14.329923] input: Asus WMI hotkeys as
/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/input/input11
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 5:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 6:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (21 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|No |Yes
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 6:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (20 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #4 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
I see, the kewly added platform profile support fails to initialize and thus
the whole driver fails to load.
Can you share the output of "acpidump"?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 8:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (19 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #5 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Created attachment 307259
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307259&action=edit
acpidump of latest kernel 6.12-rc7
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 9:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (18 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #6 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Created attachment 307260
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307260&action=edit
acpidump of older kernel 6.9.12
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 9:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 9:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 11:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (17 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #7 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
I did acpidumps on 6.12-rc7 (with the regression) and on an older kernel 6.9.12
(with no issue). Interestingly the dump is not identical. Not sure, if that is
to be expected or not. See the two attachments. And here is the diff:
❯ diff acpidump_6.*
47639c47639
< 0000: 50 48 41 54 0D 06 00 00 01 2A 5F 41 53 55 53 5F PHAT.....*_ASUS_
---
> 0000: 50 48 41 54 0D 06 00 00 01 C0 5F 41 53 55 53 5F PHAT......_ASUS_
47708,47709c47708,47709
< 0450: 45 00 45 00 43 00 33 00 29 00 00 00 01 48 FD FB E.E.C.3.)....H..
< 0460: A7 01 00 00 00 F1 B7 8E 98 01 00 00 00 2D 00 00 .............-..
---
> 0450: 45 00 45 00 43 00 33 00 29 00 00 00 01 1F 3D AA E.E.C.3.).....=.
> 0460: A7 01 00 00 00 17 76 4B 99 01 00 00 00 2E 00 00 ......vK........
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 9:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 11:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (16 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #8 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
It seems that the ACPI method responsible for setting the thermal policy always
returns the thermal policy passed as an argument. The driver however checks if
the return value is zero and returns an error if its not.
After checking the acpidumps from other ASUS machines, it seems that the return
value has not special meaning (some always return 1, some return something
different).
Can you apply a patch and build a custom kernel?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 11:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 11:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (15 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #9 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Yes, sure. Would it be sufficient to build a module or is the full kernel build
needed? (The latter takes significantly longer on the laptop.)
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 11:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (14 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #10 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
You will only need to build the module, i will send you a patch soon.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 11:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #11 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
Can you check in the mean time if any BIOS updates are available for your
device?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #12 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
I am running the latest official BIOS version from ASUS (307 from 2024/04/03).
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 13:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-21 21:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #13 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
Created attachment 307261
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=307261&action=edit
Prototype patch
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-21 21:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-22 12:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-21 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #14 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
Can you apply this patch and test if this solves the problem?
I still suspect that this is somehow a BIOS issue, so if you have a dualboot
setup then please try to verify if the ASUS software under Windows can
successfully switch thermal policies.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-21 21:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-22 12:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-22 12:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-22 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #15 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Hi Armin
I cannot comnpile the module. I get the following error:
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c: In function 'fan_boost_mode_write':
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c:3116:38: error: 'retval' undeclared (first use
in this function)
3116 | &retval);
| ^~~~~~
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c:3116:38: note: each undeclared identifier is
reported only once for each function it appears in
CC [M] drivers/platform/x86/gpd-pocket-fan.o
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c: In function 'throttle_thermal_policy_write':
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c:3699:13: warning: unused variable 'retval'
[-Wunused-variable]
3699 | u32 retval;
| ^~~~~~
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-22 12:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-22 12:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-22 14:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-22 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #16 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Update: I removed the first part of the patch (where the retval declaration was
removed). Now the patch applies and restores correct functionality.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-22 12:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-22 14:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-22 14:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-22 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #17 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
Ok, i will try to fix the issue with the patch.
Do you have a dualboot setup?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-22 14:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-22 14:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-23 22:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-22 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #18 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
No, it is a single boot setup, running only linux.
Here is the dmesg from 6.12-rc7 with the truncated patch applied:
❯ dmesg|grep asus
[ 12.756754] asus_wmi: ASUS WMI generic driver loaded
[ 12.797541] asus_wmi: Initialization: 0x1
[ 12.798530] asus_wmi: SFUN value: 0x21
[ 12.798540] asus-nb-wmi asus-nb-wmi: Detected ATK, not ASUSWMI, use DSTS
[ 12.845043] asus-nb-wmi asus-nb-wmi: Using throttle_thermal_policy for
platform_profile support
[ 12.860431] input: Asus WMI hotkeys as
/devices/platform/asus-nb-wmi/input/input11
[ 12.909854] asus_wmi: using asus-wmi for asus::kbd_backlight
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-22 14:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-23 22:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-11-24 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-23 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #19 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
I cannot replicate the issues with the original patch on the pdx86/for-next
branch, so i suspect that the patch got applied incorrectly due to missing
commits.
Are you ok if i use your email address inside the patch description?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-23 22:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-11-24 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-10 4:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-11-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #20 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
Maybe it was because I was using 6.12-rc7?
Anyway, I am ok with the email address. Thanks a lot for the fast fix!
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2024-11-24 13:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-12-10 4:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-14 10:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-12-10 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #21 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
The fix is now in 6.13-rc2 and should appear in the stable kernels soon.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-10 4:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-12-14 10:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-15 19:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-12-14 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
Guilhem Lettron (guilhem@lettron.fr) changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |219573
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219573
[Bug 219573] ASUS Zenbook UM5302TA function keys reversed and Fn lock broken
after kernel 6.12 update
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-14 10:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-12-15 19:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-16 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-16 15:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-12-15 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #22 from Armin Wolf (W_Armin@gmx.de) ---
The linux 6.12.5 kernel should now contain the necessary fixes. Can you give it
a try?
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-15 19:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-12-16 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-12-16 15:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-12-16 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #23 from Vinay Shastry (vinayshastry@gmail.com) ---
Not the reporter, but the asus_wmi bug was affecting me in a different way -
keyboard backlight control, touchpad toggle keys had stopped working on my asus
laptop.
It works again on 6.12.5 and 6.13-rc2.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread* [Bug 219517] REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12
2024-11-20 15:56 [Bug 219517] New: REGRESSION: charge_control missing in 6.12 bugzilla-daemon
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2024-12-16 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2024-12-16 15:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
25 siblings, 0 replies; 27+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2024-12-16 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219517
--- Comment #24 from Michael (auslands-kv@gmx.de) ---
(In reply to Armin Wolf from comment #22)
> The linux 6.12.5 kernel should now contain the necessary fixes. Can you give
> it a try?
I'd like to, but at the moment Nixos repos are still at 6.12.4. As soon as
6.12.5 is available I'll give it a try and report back.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 27+ messages in thread