* [Bug 221712] New: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t
@ 2026-07-01 17:36 bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 19:20 ` [Bug 221712] " bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 21:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2026-07-01 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221712
Bug ID: 221712
Summary: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package
named checkpatch, but there isn’t
Product: Documentation
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: man-pages
Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: jason@jasonyundt.email
Regression: No
README.d/deps says:
> Description
> There are different kinds of software dependencies on which this
> project depends. For maintaining the health of this project,
> the health of those dependencies is also essential. The
> following lists dependencies as <debian-package>/<binary>.
That same file goes on to say:
> Build
> To build the project, there are many dependencies, some
> of which are strictly necessary, and others which
> improve the quality (such as linters).
>
> This list can be generated by the build system itself.
> Run the following command to print this list:
>
> $ make -R help-list-build-depends
When I run “make -R help-list-build-depends”, all of the items on the list do
indeed appear be written as <debian-package>/<binary> except for one. One of
the items on the list is “checkpatch/checkpatch”. There is no Debian package
that’s named checkpatch (see <https://packages.debian.org/trixie/checkpatch>).
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* [Bug 221712] README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t
2026-07-01 17:36 [Bug 221712] New: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t bugzilla-daemon
@ 2026-07-01 19:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 21:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2026-07-01 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221712
--- Comment #1 from Alejandro Colomar (alx@kernel.org) ---
On 2026-07-01T17:36:24+0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221712
>
> Bug ID: 221712
> Summary: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package
> named checkpatch, but there isn’t
> Product: Documentation
> Version: unspecified
> Hardware: All
> OS: Linux
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: man-pages
> Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> Reporter: jason@jasonyundt.email
> Regression: No
>
> README.d/deps says:
>
> > Description
> > There are different kinds of software dependencies on which this
> > project depends. For maintaining the health of this project,
> > the health of those dependencies is also essential. The
> > following lists dependencies as <debian-package>/<binary>.
>
> That same file goes on to say:
>
> > Build
> > To build the project, there are many dependencies, some
> > of which are strictly necessary, and others which
> > improve the quality (such as linters).
> >
> > This list can be generated by the build system itself.
> > Run the following command to print this list:
> >
> > $ make -R help-list-build-depends
>
> When I run “make -R help-list-build-depends”, all of the items on the list do
> indeed appear be written as <debian-package>/<binary> except for one. One of
> the items on the list is “checkpatch/checkpatch”. There is no Debian package
> that’s named checkpatch (see
> <https://packages.debian.org/trixie/checkpatch>).
Yup; I've been wanting to package that for a long time, but never found
the time. I'll try to dedicate some time to it soon.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Alex
>
> --
> You may reply to this email to add a comment.
>
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are watching the assignee of the bug.
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug 221712] README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t
2026-07-01 17:36 [Bug 221712] New: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 19:20 ` [Bug 221712] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2026-07-01 21:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2026-07-01 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-man
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221712
--- Comment #2 from Alejandro Colomar (alx@kernel.org) ---
On 2026-07-01T21:20:36+0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> On 2026-07-01T17:36:24+0000, bugzilla-daemon@kernel.org wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=221712
> >
> > Bug ID: 221712
> > Summary: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package
> > named checkpatch, but there isn’t
> > Product: Documentation
> > Version: unspecified
> > Hardware: All
> > OS: Linux
> > Status: NEW
> > Severity: normal
> > Priority: P3
> > Component: man-pages
> > Assignee: documentation_man-pages@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> > Reporter: jason@jasonyundt.email
> > Regression: No
> >
> > README.d/deps says:
> >
> > > Description
> > > There are different kinds of software dependencies on which this
> > > project depends. For maintaining the health of this project,
> > > the health of those dependencies is also essential. The
> > > following lists dependencies as <debian-package>/<binary>.
> >
> > That same file goes on to say:
> >
> > > Build
> > > To build the project, there are many dependencies, some
> > > of which are strictly necessary, and others which
> > > improve the quality (such as linters).
> > >
> > > This list can be generated by the build system itself.
> > > Run the following command to print this list:
> > >
> > > $ make -R help-list-build-depends
> >
> > When I run “make -R help-list-build-depends”, all of the items on the list
> do
> > indeed appear be written as <debian-package>/<binary> except for one. One
> of
> > the items on the list is “checkpatch/checkpatch”. There is no Debian
> package
> > that’s named checkpatch (see
> <https://packages.debian.org/trixie/checkpatch>).
>
> Yup; I've been wanting to package that for a long time, but never found
> the time. I'll try to dedicate some time to it soon.
I've decided to entirely drop the lint-c-checkpatch target, and thus the
dependency. The problem is solved. :)
Cheers,
Alex
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> >
> > --
> > You may reply to this email to add a comment.
> >
> > You are receiving this mail because:
> > You are watching the assignee of the bug.
>
> --
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
--
You may reply to this email to add a comment.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-01 21:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-01 17:36 [Bug 221712] New: README.d/deps implies that there is a Debian package named checkpatch, but there isn’t bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 19:20 ` [Bug 221712] " bugzilla-daemon
2026-07-01 21:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.