* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 298 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #1 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
Created attachment 73840
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=73840&action=edit
Xorg.0.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1188 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:02 ` [Bug 60028] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 633 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #2 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
Created attachment 73842
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=73842&action=edit
Output from successive runs of 'top'
Running 'top' revealed the memory leak.
This attachment is (clipped) output from top. Running the 'prboom-plus' game
on a kernel that was not leaking, then several snapshots on a kernel that was
leaking.
Eventually the game was taken out by the OOM killer, and system memory usage
was restored to normal.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1575 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:02 ` [Bug 60028] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3410 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #3 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
Bisecting
So far, I have only bisected using my local custom kernel branch. As described
above, I use stable kernel releases to avoid the massive breakage that
frequently occurs in -rc kernels, and I cherry pick commits from drm-fixes and
drm-next. This is a potential source of error (on my part), so I will not be
offended if anyone objects to me reporting bugs against such kernels. My
justification is that the HEAD of drm-fixes, which is
3.8.0~rc3 at commit 48367432 of Jan. 26
also leaks memory if I build it and use it on my system. I bisected using my
custom branch first only to save time: I add cherry picks in bunches, and keep
separate list files of which commits I have used, so manually bisecting using
those files rapidly led me to the first commit which caused the kernel to leak
memory.
[I will bisect using drm-fixes (or drm-next) if asked, but there are issues
with Mesa not being compatible before a certain point in mid-December, so that
I would have to use an older version of Mesa or patch some of the older
bisection points with later commits in order to use the version of Mesa
I currently have installed.]
For this testing, I started with stable kernel 3.7.4 and applied my lists of
cherry picks that had built up since 3.7-rc7 or so. I had built up 11 lists of
commits as I added new upstream code to my local branch, so I could perform a
manual bisection by applying an entire list at a time until I found a kernel
which leaked memory. From that, I would know which list introduce the problem,
and I could build kernels at each commit in that list until I found the first
one that resulted in leaks. (If anyone is interested in those lists I will be
glad to post them; I have only withheld them for the sake of brevity.)
The manual bisection led me to a last good commit and a first bad commit. The
cherry picking process causes my branch to have new SHA1 ID numbers, so I
instead of using the 'git log' info from my branch am will use the info
from the drm-airlied/drm-fixes branch. The first bad commit was:
commit 4ac0533abaec2b83a7f2c675010eedd55664bc26
Author: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Dec 13 12:08:11 2012 -0500
drm/radeon: fix htile buffer size computation for command stream
checker
Fix the size computation of the htile buffer.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The previous commit, which worked fine, was:
commit 9af20792124850369e764965690b99b20623dfc4
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Tue Dec 11 23:42:24 2012 +0100
drm/radeon: fix fence locking in the pageflip callback
We need to hold bdev->fence_lock while grabbing a reference to
the fence, to prevent concurrent clearing/changing of the
ttm_bo->sync_obj field.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This was a time-consuming process, but much shorter than it would have been
using 'git bisect' in drm-fixes. Later, I made two attempts to revert the
"bad" code on top of the HEAD of my local branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4551 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-29 16:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #4 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
Created attachment 73843
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=73843&action=edit
diff of attempt to partially revert problem commit
Naive attempt to revert
My first attempt to revert the patch revealed to be the problem
above did not work. (A diff of the changes is attached.) The
problem commit touched evergreen_cs.c and r600_cs.c, and since I
have Evergreen Juniper hardware I only reverted the code in
evergreen_cs.c. The kernel built using this approach still
leaked memory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1662 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-29 16:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #5 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
Created attachment 73844
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=73844&action=edit
diff of attempt to manually revert entire problem commit
Attempt to revert the entire commit
I then decided to manually revert all of the changes in the *.c
files touched by that commit. (A diff of these changes is
attached.) The kernel still leaked memory.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1531 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-29 16:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-29 16:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1351 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #6 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
I do not know how to interpret these findings. I am not a developer, and work
with the few tools that I (sort of) know how to use much more slowly than
experienced developers would. I ran out of time over the weekend, and will
have
to investigate further this coming weekend.
I have been trying to think of possible explanations:
- could a later commit causes a similar (or identical)
memory leak to the one caused by 4ac0533a?
- is the problem really located somewhere else
besides in the kernel DRM, such as in Mesa, with
it being triggered by more than one kind of
code change in the DRM?
I thought that the bisection would be conclusive, but the failure of the revert
attempts undermined my goal. If no one demands that I bisect using one of the
drm-airlied branches, then I will try another custom branch which drops the
commit first causing the leak, and see if any later commits also cause a leak.
(If a developer demands that I bisect an upstream branch, I'll do that
instead.)
Is there anything else I can do to be helpful at this point?
Can any of you confirm/reproduce this memory leak on your own systems?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2130 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-29 16:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-29 16:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-30 13:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-29 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #7 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
This is indeed more likely an issue in Mesa than in the kernel. The commit you
bisected also bumps KMS_DRIVER_MINOR in radeon_drv.c, which may cause the Mesa
code to use different code paths.
Does current Mesa Git still leak?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1223 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-29 16:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-30 13:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-30 14:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-30 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1781 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #8 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> This is indeed more likely an issue in Mesa than in the kernel. The commit
> you bisected also bumps KMS_DRIVER_MINOR in radeon_drv.c, which may cause
> the Mesa code to use different code paths.
In my two attempted manual reverts, I didn't know what effect the code in
radeon_drv.c actually had. When looking at later DRM changes (after the one
identified by the bisection) I saw that the value of KMS_DRIVER_MINOR was
incremented further, so I thought I should leave the value unchanged.
> Does current Mesa Git still leak?
After updating/merging to the current HEAD (commit 02b6da1e of Jan. 29), I
built new Mesa packages and installed them.
I am currently relying the last kernel from my local tree which does not leak,
so I rebooted to the kernel I had built that is most current with the upstream
DRM changes: stable 3.7.4 + many commits from drm-next/drm-fixes up to commit
014b3440 of Jan. 21 in drm-fixes.
Yes, it still leaks.
Would it be good for me to bisect Mesa? I would use my most up-to-date kernel,
try to find an older version of Mesa which does not leak, and then identify the
first patch to Mesa which causes the leaking.
The testing I have done so far was assuming the problem was in the kernel, but
I was planning to look at Mesa as well. I decided to report the bug before
continuing, hoping for some guidance from the experts. If there really is a
memory leak caused by the kernel DRI, then I would like to help get it fixed
before 3.8 is released; or, if there is a problem in Mesa I would like to help
get it fixed for 9.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2667 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-30 13:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-30 14:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 13:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 693 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #9 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Would it be good for me to bisect Mesa?
If Mesa commit 6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664 (where code depending
on DRM minor 26 was first introduced) doesn't leak, yes please.
BTW, does setting the environment variable R600_HYPERZ=0 for the leaking
process(es) work around the problem?
> The testing I have done so far was assuming the problem was in the kernel,
> [...]
The fact that the memory is reclaimed on process exit makes that unlikely.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1593 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-30 14:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 13:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 13:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #10 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
> > The testing I have done so far was assuming the problem was in the kernel,
> > [...]
>
> The fact that the memory is reclaimed on process exit makes that unlikely.
That makes perfect sense. Thank you for that explanation -- I was wondering
whether there were ways to distinguish a memory leak in the kernel from one in
Mesa.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1350 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 13:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 13:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 13:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1410 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #11 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Would it be good for me to bisect Mesa?
>
> If Mesa commit 6532eb17baff6e61b427f29e076883f8941ae664 (where code
> depending on DRM minor 26 was first introduced) doesn't leak, yes please.
Because of work, I was going to wait until Friday to check this... but I found
some time last night to give it a try.
With my custom 3.7.4 kernel (+ post 3.7 Radeon-related commits up to Jan. 21) I
built Mesa at commit 6532eb17 ... and that leaked memory as described before.
I then built Mesa at one commit earlier (24b1206a), and the memory leak was
gone.
That's not the sort of help I hoped to provide....
> BTW, does setting the environment variable R600_HYPERZ=0 for the leaking
> process(es) work around the problem?
With up-to-date kernel and up-to-date Mesa (commit 02b6da1e of Jan. 29), using
R600_HYPERZ=0 _does_ eliminate the memory leak.
Of course, I am hoping to be _able_ to use the Hyper Z functionality, so I have
to admit disappointment about having to use that workaround; but at least it
allows me to use the rest of the DRI and Mesa changes since Dec. 19.
Needless to say, I'm definitely willing to test further changes in the DRI
and/or Mesa!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2348 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 13:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 13:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 13:44 ` [Bug 60028] r600g: Htile memory leak bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
Alex Deucher <agd5f@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product|DRI |Mesa
Version|unspecified |git
Component|DRM/Radeon |Drivers/Gallium/r600
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1372 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] r600g: Htile memory leak
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 13:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 13:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 14:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 15:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 425 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
Alex Deucher <agd5f@yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Post-3.7.x memory leak, |r600g: Htile memory leak
|Radeon Evergreen, bisected |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1067 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] r600g: Htile memory leak
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 13:44 ` [Bug 60028] r600g: Htile memory leak bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 14:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-01-31 15:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
--- Comment #12 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
Should be fixed by commit 5c86a728d4f688c0fe7fbf9f4b8f88060b65c4ee ('r600g: fix
htile buffer leak'). Please resolve as fixed if you can confirm.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1088 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug 60028] r600g: Htile memory leak
2013-01-29 16:00 [Bug 60028] New: Post-3.7.x memory leak, Radeon Evergreen, bisected bugzilla-daemon
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2013-01-31 14:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-01-31 15:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-01-31 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 738 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60028
Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Dave Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> ---
The canaries lived!
I had just enough time before work to build Mesa (at 5c86a728) and test the
programs which easily reproduce the leak. All is well now.
Amazing how much difference a single line can make!
Many thanks to Marek, Michel, and Alex.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2133 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread