All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug 90482] New: Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
@ 2015-05-16 15:14 bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2015-05-16 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2020 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

            Bug ID: 90482
           Summary: Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent
                    screen configuration
           Product: xorg
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
                OS: Linux (All)
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Driver/nouveau
          Assignee: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
          Reporter: dura-PlyTytoxC32F389P3+uynUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
        QA Contact: xorg-team-go0+a7rfsptAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org

Created attachment 115835
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=115835&action=edit
my xorg.conf

My xorg setup is based on two independent screen (see attached xorg.conf). Most
of the time the Xorg process eat 100% of one CPU core.

I will try to explain what I think is the problem and the fix (or workaround) I
made to the nouveau code.

Basically, the problem is that nouveau add a socket to the xorg socket list but
does not register a handler that will be able to deal with it. When data is
received on this socket the Select call in xorg-server/os/WaitFor.c will return
but the data will not be read. When Select is called again it returns
immediately because data was not read, and again, and again, resulting in 100%
CPU core consumption.

Now, some details (based on xf86-video-nouveau-1.0.11 source code)
To add a socket in the xorg server list AddGeneralSocket is used.
In src/drmmode_display.c AddGeneralSocket is called in two places: line 1605
(via drmmode_uevent_init and line 1554) and 1610. If line 1608 condition is not
meet, a socket is added without an handler so drmmode_wakeup_handler will never
be called with correct data.

My solution is to add a new handler that will only handle the udev part when
line 1608 condition is not meet. See attached patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3354 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug 90482] Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
@ 2015-05-16 15:15   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2015-05-16 20:42   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
                     ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2015-05-16 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

--- Comment #1 from dura <dura-PlyTytoxC32F389P3+uynUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> ---
Created attachment 115836
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=115836&action=edit
quick and dirty fix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1324 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug 90482] Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
  2015-05-16 15:15   ` [Bug 90482] " bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
@ 2015-05-16 20:42   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2015-05-16 20:53   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2015-05-16 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8176 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

--- Comment #2 from Matti Nykyri <matti.nykyri-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> ---
I also have two screen setup and am facing the same problem since beginning of
April.

Strace shows the KOBJENT NETLINK socket in Xorg returning immediately from
select. The host gets around 9000 interupts / sec:

cat /proc/interupts
           CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       
  0:        151          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
  1:          1          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
  8:         20          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      rtc0
  9:          0          0          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
 12:          1          0          0          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 16:       8898          0          0          0   IO-APIC  16-fasteoi  
ehci_hcd:usb1
 17:       1268          0          0          0   IO-APIC  17-fasteoi  
snd_hda_intel
 18:          0          0          0          0   IO-APIC  18-fasteoi  
0000:03:00.0, i801_smbus
 19:      70297          0          0          0   IO-APIC  19-fasteoi  
pata_jmicron
 23:         33          0          0          0   IO-APIC  23-fasteoi  
ehci_hcd:usb2
 24:    6912419          0          0          0  HPET_MSI-edge      hpet2
 25:          0    7491688          0          0  HPET_MSI-edge      hpet3
 26:          0          0    4552335          0  HPET_MSI-edge      hpet4
 27:          0          0          0    8398350  HPET_MSI-edge      hpet5
 34:     155556          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      nouveau
 35:      37000          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge     
0000:00:1f.2
 36:          0          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge     
0000:09:00.0
 37:     120172          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge      enp5s0
 38:        325          0          0          0   PCI-MSI-edge     
snd_hda_intel
NMI:      76929      95741      80757      78650   Non-maskable interrupts
LOC:          0        125        121        118   Local timer interrupts
SPU:          0          0          0          0   Spurious interrupts
PMI:      76928      95740      80756      78649   Performance monitoring
interrupts
IWI:         11         10         11          5   IRQ work interrupts
RTR:          5          0          0          0   APIC ICR read retries
RES:      83545      76436      81720      73802   Rescheduling interrupts
CAL:        142        146        161         94   Function call interrupts
TLB:        276        150        213        227   TLB shootdowns
TRM:          0          0          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
THR:          0          0          0          0   Threshold APIC interrupts
MCE:          0          0          0          0   Machine check exceptions
MCP:        251        251        251        251   Machine check polls
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

Kernel function tracer:
cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277687: __fget_light <-__fdget
             zsh-6138  [002] d... 74409.277688: __mod_zone_page_state
<-get_page_from_freelist
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: sock_poll <-do_select
             zsh-6138  [002] d... 74409.277688: zone_statistics
<-get_page_from_freelist
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: unix_poll <-sock_poll
             zsh-6138  [002] d... 74409.277688: __inc_zone_state
<-zone_statistics
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fdget <-do_select
             zsh-6138  [002] d... 74409.277688: __inc_zone_state
<-zone_statistics
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: sock_poll <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: unix_poll <-sock_poll
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fdget <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: sock_poll <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: unix_poll <-sock_poll
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fdget <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277688: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: sock_poll <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: unix_poll <-sock_poll
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: __fdget <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: sock_poll <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: unix_poll <-sock_poll
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: __fdget <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: sock_poll <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: unix_poll <-sock_poll
             zsh-6138  [002] .... 74409.277689: kmemleak_alloc <-kmalloc_order
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277689: __fdget <-do_select
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277690: __fget_light <-__fdget
               X-2956  [000] .... 74409.277690: sock_poll <-do_select

Perf top:
   PerfTop:    9602 irqs/sec  kernel:86.0%  exact:  0.0% [4000Hz cycles], 
(all, 4 CPUs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19.24%  [kernel]                 [k] do_select                  
    17.08%  [kernel]                 [k] __fget_light               
    13.34%  [kernel]                 [k] unix_poll                  
    13.18%  [kernel]                 [k] sock_poll                  
     3.00%  [kernel]                 [k] do_raw_spin_lock           
     1.81%  [kernel]                 [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore
     1.55%  Xorg                     [.] WaitForSomething           
     1.45%  [kernel]                 [k] __fdget                    
     1.38%  [kernel]                 [k] datagram_poll              
     1.37%  [kernel]                 [k] fput                       
     1.37%  [kernel]                 [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave     
     1.37%  [kernel]                 [k] __pollwait                 
     1.31%  [vdso]                   [.] __vdso_clock_gettime       
     1.23%  [kernel]                 [k] memset                     
     0.76%  libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0  [.] pushbuf_flush              
     0.76%  libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0  [.] pushbuf_kref               
     0.72%  nouveau_drv.so           [.] drmmode_wakeup_handler     
     0.72%  [kernel]                 [k] copy_user_generic_string   
     0.64%  [kernel]                 [k] do_raw_spin_unlock         
     0.61%  [kernel]                 [k] hpet_msi_next_event        
     0.57%  libdrm_nouveau.so.2.0.0  [.] nouveau_bo_ref             
     0.55%  [kernel]                 [k] system_call                
     0.54%  [kernel]                 [k] core_sys_select            
     0.51%  [kernel]                 [k] select_estimate_accuracy   
     0.45%  nouveau_drv.so           [.] NVBlockHandler             
     0.44%  Xorg                     [.] GetTimeInMillis            
     0.43%  [kernel]                 [k] poll_freewait              
     0.43%  [kernel]                 [k] ktime_get_ts64             
     0.42%  [kernel]                 [k] remove_wait_queue          
     0.41%  Xorg                     [.] IdleTimeWakeupHandler      
     0.40%  [kernel]                 [k] add_wait_queue             
     0.39%  libexa.so                [.] ExaBlockHandler            
     0.37%  Xorg                     [.] BlockHandler               
     0.35%  Xorg                     [.] WakeupHandler              
     0.32%  Xorg                     [.] xf86Wakeup                 
     0.31%  [kernel]                 [k] nouveau_barobj_wr32        

The bug activates when display of a screen is turned on. Restarting X fixes the
issue until a display is cycled.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 9056 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug 90482] Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
  2015-05-16 15:15   ` [Bug 90482] " bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2015-05-16 20:42   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
@ 2015-05-16 20:53   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2016-10-24  9:41   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2019-12-04  8:59   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2015-05-16 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7541 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

--- Comment #3 from Matti Nykyri <matti.nykyri-X3B1VOXEql0@public.gmane.org> ---
and strace Xorg(PID 2954):
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 56000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 55981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 56000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 55981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 55000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 54982})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 55000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 54981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 55000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 54981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 54000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 53982})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 54000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 53982})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 54000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 53981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 53000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 52981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 53000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 52981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 53000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 52981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 52000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 51981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 52000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 51981})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 51000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 50982})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 51000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 50983})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 51000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 50983})
2954  select(256, [1 3 5 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81], NULL,
NULL, {264, 51000}) = 1 (in [12], left {264, 50983})

cat /proc/2954/fd:
0 l-wx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 0 -> /var/log/Xorg.0.log
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 1 -> socket:[12196]
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 10 -> /dev/dri/card0
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 11 -> socket:[1845]
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 12 -> socket:[1858]
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 13 -> /dev/dri/card0
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 14 -> /dev/input/event1
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 15 -> /dev/input/event0
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 16 -> /dev/input/event2
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 17 -> /dev/input/event3
0 lrwx------ 1 root root 64 May 16 23:47 18 -> socket:[2848]
....etc

lsof -p 2954:
X       2954 root    0w      REG                8,2   164675     262153
/var/log/Xorg.0.log
X       2954 root    1u     unix 0xffff880214864840      0t0      12196
@/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
X       2954 root    2w      REG                8,2    56795     262596
/var/log/kdm.log
X       2954 root    3u     unix 0xffff880214864c80      0t0      12197
/tmp/.X11-unix/X0
X       2954 root    4r      REG                8,2    31614     524293
/usr/lib64/xorg/protocol.txt
X       2954 root    5u  netlink                         0t0       2823
KOBJECT_UEVENT
X       2954 root    6w      REG                0,3        0 4026531961
/proc/mtrr
X       2954 root    7w      REG                0,3        0 4026531961
/proc/mtrr
X       2954 root    8u      CHR                4,7      0t0       2080
/dev/tty7
X       2954 root    9u      CHR              10,63      0t0       1026
/dev/vga_arbiter
X       2954 root   10u      CHR              226,0      0t0       1044
/dev/dri/card0
X       2954 root   11u     sock                0,6      0t0       1845
protocol: NETLINK
X       2954 root   12u  netlink                         0t0       1858
KOBJECT_UEVENT
X       2954 root   13u      CHR              226,0      0t0       1044
/dev/dri/card0
X       2954 root   14u      CHR              13,65      0t0       1082
/dev/input/event1
X       2954 root   15u      CHR              13,64      0t0      10912
/dev/input/event0
X       2954 root   16u      CHR              13,66      0t0       2447
/dev/input/event2
X       2954 root   17u      CHR              13,67      0t0       1323
/dev/input/event3
X       2954 root   18u     unix 0xffff8800d9839100      0t0       2848
@/tmp/.X11-unix/X0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 8369 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug 90482] Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-05-16 20:53   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
@ 2016-10-24  9:41   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  2019-12-04  8:59   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2016-10-24  9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 669 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

--- Comment #4 from Mariusz Białończyk <manio-RFXG7K41k5GsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org> ---
@dura
Thank you for your quick and dirty fix!
I am also suffering the same problem (reported here btw:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98383).

In case when my xinerama is disabled, your patch is working great. No more 100%
cpu usage!
But when it is disabled and I power up my TV, then I have still have server
crash, but that could be another story (maybe related?).

What is the problem to merge this patch upstream?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1638 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 154 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug 90482] Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration
       [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
                     ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2016-10-24  9:41   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
@ 2019-12-04  8:59   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ @ 2019-12-04  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nouveau-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 870 bytes --]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90482

Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |MOVED

--- Comment #5 from Martin Peres <martin.peres-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org> ---
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been
closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link
to our GitLab instance:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-nouveau/issues/190.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2479 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-12-04  8:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-16 15:14 [Bug 90482] New: Xorg take 100% CPU when using multiple independent screen configuration bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
     [not found] ` <bug-90482-8800-V0hAGp6uBxMKqLRl/0Ahz6D7qz1kEfGD2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org/>
2015-05-16 15:15   ` [Bug 90482] " bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
2015-05-16 20:42   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
2015-05-16 20:53   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
2016-10-24  9:41   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ
2019-12-04  8:59   ` bugzilla-daemon-CC+yJ3UmIYqDUpFQwHEjaQ

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.