* [Bug 92729] VDPAU: Maybe support H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE
@ 2015-10-29 18:48 bugzilla-daemon
2015-10-29 18:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-05-28 11:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2015-10-29 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dri-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2196 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92729
Bug ID: 92729
Summary: VDPAU: Maybe support H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE
Product: Mesa
Version: 11.0
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Drivers/Gallium/r600
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: andreaskem@web.de
QA Contact: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
I am not sure if this is the proper place to report this, so feel free to send
me somewhere else and I apologize in advance.
I am on the Mesa 11.0.4 r600 driver with the following device:
00:01.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
Wrestler [Radeon HD 7340]
and Xorg 1.17.3. (Arch Linux with testing repository enabled, everything
up-to-date).
vdpauinfo reports (see attachment) that the H.264 profiles H264_BASELINE,
H264_MAIN, and H264_HIGH are supported for VDPAU hardware acceleration.
However, H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE is marked "not supported". Now, if the
Wikipedia article about H.264 profiles is to be believed [1], the constrained
profile only needs a "subset of features that are in common between the
Baseline, Main, and High Profiles." Consequently, I would expect
H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE to be supported, as well.
See also the bug report I filed for mpv a few weeks ago [2].
Moreover, H264_PROGRESSIVE_HIGH and H264_CONSTRAINED_HIGH seem to be "Similar
to the High profile, but without support of field coding features." and
"Similar to the Progressive High profile, but without support of B
(bi-predictive) slices." respectively. However, vdpauinfo reports "not
supported" for both.
As I am writing this, I also notice that VC1_ADVANCED is supported, but
VC1_MAIN and VC1_SIMPLE are not. Reading [3], I would expect the same reasoning
to apply.
Is there something I am missing?
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC#Profiles
[2] https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/2347
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VC-1#Profiles
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3732 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-28 11:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-29 18:48 [Bug 92729] VDPAU: Maybe support H264_CONSTRAINED_BASELINE bugzilla-daemon
2015-10-29 18:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2017-05-28 11:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.