From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm/test: use after free in dmirror_allocate_chunk()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:31:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c25729e4-8a53-07e3-ae98-d77919f3ac21@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922081234.GA1274646@mwanda>
On 9/22/20 1:12 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The error handling code does this:
>
> err_free:
> kfree(devmem);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> err_release:
> release_mem_region(devmem->pagemap.range.start, range_len(&devmem->pagemap.range));
> ^^^^^^^^
> The problem is that when we use "devmem->pagemap.range.start" the
> "devmem" pointer is either NULL or freed.
>
> Neither the allocation nor the call to request_free_mem_region() has to
> be done under the lock so I moved those to the start of the function.
>
> Fixes: b2ef9f5a5cb3 ("mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's weird that I didn't catch the use after free when this code was
> merged in May... My bad. Not sure what happened there. How I found
> this was that I have been reviewing release_mem_region() leaks and the
> NULL dereference path is a leak.
>
Thanks for fixing this. I missed it too. :-)
> lib/test_hmm.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
> index c8133f50160b..0503c78cb322 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,22 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
> unsigned long pfn_last;
> void *ptr;
>
> + devmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*devmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!devmem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + res = request_free_mem_region(&iomem_resource, DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE,
> + "hmm_dmirror");
> + if (IS_ERR(res))
> + goto err_devmem;
> +
> + devmem->pagemap.type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
> + devmem->pagemap.range.start = res->start;
> + devmem->pagemap.range.end = res->end;
> + devmem->pagemap.nr_range = 1;
> + devmem->pagemap.ops = &dmirror_devmem_ops;
> + devmem->pagemap.owner = mdevice;
> +
> mutex_lock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
>
> if (mdevice->devmem_count = mdevice->devmem_capacity) {
> @@ -471,30 +487,16 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
> sizeof(new_chunks[0]) * new_capacity,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_chunks)
Need to call mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock).
In fact, why not make this goto err_unlock and add
err_unlock: mutex_unlock() before the err_release:.
> - goto err;
> + goto err_release;> mdevice->devmem_capacity = new_capacity;
> mdevice->devmem_chunks = new_chunks;
> }
>
> - res = request_free_mem_region(&iomem_resource, DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE,
> - "hmm_dmirror");
> - if (IS_ERR(res))
> - goto err;
> -
> - devmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*devmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!devmem)
> - goto err_release;
> -
> - devmem->pagemap.type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
> - devmem->pagemap.range.start = res->start;
> - devmem->pagemap.range.end = res->end;
> - devmem->pagemap.nr_range = 1;
> - devmem->pagemap.ops = &dmirror_devmem_ops;
> - devmem->pagemap.owner = mdevice;
> -
> ptr = memremap_pages(&devmem->pagemap, numa_node_id());
> - if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> - goto err_free;
> + if (IS_ERR(ptr)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
> + goto err_release;
> + }
This could then be just goto err_unlock.
> devmem->mdevice = mdevice;
> pfn_first = devmem->pagemap.range.start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -525,12 +527,11 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
>
> return true;
>
> -err_free:
> - kfree(devmem);
> err_release:
> release_mem_region(devmem->pagemap.range.start, range_len(&devmem->pagemap.range));
> -err:
> - mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
> +err_devmem:
> + kfree(devmem);
> +
> return false;
> }
>
With the suggested change, you can add
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
To: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm/test: use after free in dmirror_allocate_chunk()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:31:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c25729e4-8a53-07e3-ae98-d77919f3ac21@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922081234.GA1274646@mwanda>
On 9/22/20 1:12 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The error handling code does this:
>
> err_free:
> kfree(devmem);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> err_release:
> release_mem_region(devmem->pagemap.range.start, range_len(&devmem->pagemap.range));
> ^^^^^^^^
> The problem is that when we use "devmem->pagemap.range.start" the
> "devmem" pointer is either NULL or freed.
>
> Neither the allocation nor the call to request_free_mem_region() has to
> be done under the lock so I moved those to the start of the function.
>
> Fixes: b2ef9f5a5cb3 ("mm/hmm/test: add selftest driver for HMM")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---
> It's weird that I didn't catch the use after free when this code was
> merged in May... My bad. Not sure what happened there. How I found
> this was that I have been reviewing release_mem_region() leaks and the
> NULL dereference path is a leak.
>
Thanks for fixing this. I missed it too. :-)
> lib/test_hmm.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_hmm.c b/lib/test_hmm.c
> index c8133f50160b..0503c78cb322 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hmm.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hmm.c
> @@ -459,6 +459,22 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
> unsigned long pfn_last;
> void *ptr;
>
> + devmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*devmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!devmem)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + res = request_free_mem_region(&iomem_resource, DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE,
> + "hmm_dmirror");
> + if (IS_ERR(res))
> + goto err_devmem;
> +
> + devmem->pagemap.type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
> + devmem->pagemap.range.start = res->start;
> + devmem->pagemap.range.end = res->end;
> + devmem->pagemap.nr_range = 1;
> + devmem->pagemap.ops = &dmirror_devmem_ops;
> + devmem->pagemap.owner = mdevice;
> +
> mutex_lock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
>
> if (mdevice->devmem_count == mdevice->devmem_capacity) {
> @@ -471,30 +487,16 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
> sizeof(new_chunks[0]) * new_capacity,
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!new_chunks)
Need to call mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock).
In fact, why not make this goto err_unlock and add
err_unlock: mutex_unlock() before the err_release:.
> - goto err;
> + goto err_release;> mdevice->devmem_capacity = new_capacity;
> mdevice->devmem_chunks = new_chunks;
> }
>
> - res = request_free_mem_region(&iomem_resource, DEVMEM_CHUNK_SIZE,
> - "hmm_dmirror");
> - if (IS_ERR(res))
> - goto err;
> -
> - devmem = kzalloc(sizeof(*devmem), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!devmem)
> - goto err_release;
> -
> - devmem->pagemap.type = MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE;
> - devmem->pagemap.range.start = res->start;
> - devmem->pagemap.range.end = res->end;
> - devmem->pagemap.nr_range = 1;
> - devmem->pagemap.ops = &dmirror_devmem_ops;
> - devmem->pagemap.owner = mdevice;
> -
> ptr = memremap_pages(&devmem->pagemap, numa_node_id());
> - if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> - goto err_free;
> + if (IS_ERR(ptr)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
> + goto err_release;
> + }
This could then be just goto err_unlock.
> devmem->mdevice = mdevice;
> pfn_first = devmem->pagemap.range.start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -525,12 +527,11 @@ static bool dmirror_allocate_chunk(struct dmirror_device *mdevice,
>
> return true;
>
> -err_free:
> - kfree(devmem);
> err_release:
> release_mem_region(devmem->pagemap.range.start, range_len(&devmem->pagemap.range));
> -err:
> - mutex_unlock(&mdevice->devmem_lock);
> +err_devmem:
> + kfree(devmem);
> +
> return false;
> }
>
With the suggested change, you can add
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-22 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 8:12 [PATCH] mm/hmm/test: use after free in dmirror_allocate_chunk() Dan Carpenter
2020-09-22 8:12 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-22 17:31 ` Ralph Campbell [this message]
2020-09-22 17:31 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-24 13:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Dan Carpenter
2020-09-24 13:46 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-09-24 19:25 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-24 19:25 ` Ralph Campbell
2020-09-24 13:47 ` [PATCH] " Dan Carpenter
2020-09-24 13:47 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c25729e4-8a53-07e3-ae98-d77919f3ac21@nvidia.com \
--to=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.