* [U-Boot-Users] BDI2000 not good for ARM946?
@ 2004-08-04 20:46 Shawn Jin
2004-08-05 6:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Jin @ 2004-08-04 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
I know this is out of the topic of this mailing list. But I really
need some comments on this issue and I know that this probably is the
best place to get a quick feedback for BDI2000 since a lot of ppl here
use it.
Some people using BDI2000 to bring up ARM946 board have a little
complaint that BDI2000 works flakey on their board. (It took them a
week to figure out its configuration file and sometimes it just simply
doesn't work.)
However my experience on ppc bring-up tells me that BDI2000 works
perfectly. So I'm wondering if this is an individual case for ARM
bring-up. Or BDI2000 for ARM is not as good as for PPC?
Please share your experience.
Best regards,
-Shawn.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot-Users] BDI2000 not good for ARM946?
2004-08-04 20:46 [U-Boot-Users] BDI2000 not good for ARM946? Shawn Jin
@ 2004-08-05 6:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2004-08-05 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Dear Shawn,
in message <c3d0340b040804134627e0e723@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>
> Some people using BDI2000 to bring up ARM946 board have a little
> complaint that BDI2000 works flakey on their board. (It took them a
> week to figure out its configuration file and sometimes it just simply
> doesn't work.)
It takes some understanding of the hardware to come up with a working
BDI2000 configuration file. And of course the stability of the system
BDI2000-target depends on _both_ components, the BDI2000 _and_ the
target.
My guess is that these people have little experience and/or flakey
target hardware.
> However my experience on ppc bring-up tells me that BDI2000 works
> perfectly. So I'm wondering if this is an individual case for ARM
> bring-up. Or BDI2000 for ARM is not as good as for PPC?
We use the BDI2000 on PowerPC, MIPS and ARM. I remember only one case
when a specific version of the firmware had problems (and this got
replaced by Abatron within a few hours). In all other cases the
BDi200 has proved to be absolutely reliable and stable. I see no
difference whether on ARM, MIPS or PowerPC.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
"I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid" - the artificial person,
from _Aliens_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-05 6:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-04 20:46 [U-Boot-Users] BDI2000 not good for ARM946? Shawn Jin
2004-08-05 6:59 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.