Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH 01/11] drm/msm/dsi: add support for dsc data

[abhinavk@codeaurora.org]

On 2021-07-14 23:51, Vinod Koul wrote:
> Display Stream Compression (DSC) parameters need to be calculated. Add
> helpers and struct msm_display_dsc_config in msm_drv for this
> msm_display_dsc_config uses drm_dsc_config for DSC parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes since RFC:
>  - Drop the DT parsing code
>  - Port dsc param calculation from downstream
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h      |  21 +++++
>  2 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index 8a10e4343281..e1e5d91809b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
> 
>  #define DSI_RESET_TOGGLE_DELAY_MS 20
> 
> +static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct msm_display_dsc_config 
> *dsc);
> +
>  static int dsi_get_version(const void __iomem *base, u32 *major, u32 
> *minor)
>  {
>  	u32 ver;
> @@ -156,6 +158,7 @@ struct msm_dsi_host {
>  	struct regmap *sfpb;
> 
>  	struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +	struct msm_display_dsc_config *dsc;
> 
>  	/* connected device info */
>  	struct device_node *device_node;
> @@ -1744,6 +1747,136 @@ static int dsi_host_parse_lane_data(struct
> msm_dsi_host *msm_host,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
> 
> +static u32 dsi_dsc_rc_buf_thresh[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES - 1] = {
> +	0x0e, 0x1c, 0x2a, 0x38, 0x46, 0x54, 0x62,
> +	0x69, 0x70, 0x77, 0x79, 0x7b, 0x7d, 0x7e
> +};
> +
> +/* only 8bpc, 8bpp added */
> +static char min_qp[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES] = {
> +	0, 0, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5, 7, 13
> +};
> +
> +static char max_qp[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES] = {
> +	4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13, 15
> +};
> +
> +static char bpg_offset[DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES] = {
> +	2, 0, 0, -2, -4, -6, -8, -8, -8, -10, -10, -12, -12, -12, -12
> +};
> +
> +static int dsi_populate_dsc_params(struct msm_display_dsc_config *dsc)
> +{
> +	int mux_words_size;
> +	int groups_per_line, groups_total;
> +	int min_rate_buffer_size;
> +	int hrd_delay;
> +	int pre_num_extra_mux_bits, num_extra_mux_bits;
> +	int slice_bits;
> +	int target_bpp_x16;
> +	int data;
> +	int final_value, final_scale;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	dsc->drm->rc_model_size = 8192;
> +	dsc->drm->first_line_bpg_offset = 12;
> +	dsc->drm->rc_edge_factor = 6;
> +	dsc->drm->rc_tgt_offset_high = 3;
> +	dsc->drm->rc_tgt_offset_low = 3;
> +	dsc->drm->simple_422 = 0;
> +	dsc->drm->convert_rgb = 1;
> +	dsc->drm->vbr_enable = 0;
> +
> +	/* handle only bpp = bpc = 8 */
> +	for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES - 1 ; i++)
> +		dsc->drm->rc_buf_thresh[i] = dsi_dsc_rc_buf_thresh[i];
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < DSC_NUM_BUF_RANGES; i++) {
> +		dsc->drm->rc_range_params[i].range_min_qp = min_qp[i];
> +		dsc->drm->rc_range_params[i].range_max_qp = max_qp[i];
> +		dsc->drm->rc_range_params[i].range_bpg_offset = bpg_offset[i];
> +	}
> +
> +	dsc->drm->initial_offset = 6144; /* Not bpp 12 */
> +	if (dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel != 8)
> +		dsc->drm->initial_offset = 2048;	/* bpp = 12 */
> +
> +	mux_words_size = 48;		/* bpc == 8/10 */
> +	if (dsc->drm->bits_per_component == 12)
> +		mux_words_size = 64;
> +
> +	dsc->drm->initial_xmit_delay = 512;
> +	dsc->drm->initial_scale_value = 32;
> +	dsc->drm->first_line_bpg_offset = 12;
> +	dsc->drm->line_buf_depth = dsc->drm->bits_per_component + 1;
> +
> +	/* bpc 8 */
> +	dsc->drm->flatness_min_qp = 3;
> +	dsc->drm->flatness_max_qp = 12;
> +	dsc->det_thresh_flatness = 7 + 2 * (dsc->drm->bits_per_component - 
> 8);
> +	dsc->drm->rc_quant_incr_limit0 = 11;
> +	dsc->drm->rc_quant_incr_limit1 = 11;
> +	dsc->drm->mux_word_size = DSC_MUX_WORD_SIZE_8_10_BPC;
> +
> +	/* FIXME: need to call drm_dsc_compute_rc_parameters() so that rest 
> of
> +	 * params are calculated
> +	 */
> +	dsc->slice_last_group_size = 3 - (dsc->drm->slice_width % 3);
> +	groups_per_line = DIV_ROUND_UP(dsc->drm->slice_width, 3);
> +	dsc->drm->slice_chunk_size = dsc->drm->slice_width *
> dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel / 8;
> +	if ((dsc->drm->slice_width * dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel) % 8)
> +		dsc->drm->slice_chunk_size++;
> +
> +	/* rbs-min */
> +	min_rate_buffer_size =  dsc->drm->rc_model_size - 
> dsc->drm->initial_offset +
> +				dsc->drm->initial_xmit_delay * dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel +
> +				groups_per_line * dsc->drm->first_line_bpg_offset;
> +
> +	hrd_delay = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_rate_buffer_size, 
> dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel);
> +
> +	dsc->drm->initial_dec_delay = hrd_delay - 
> dsc->drm->initial_xmit_delay;
> +
> +	dsc->drm->initial_scale_value = 8 * dsc->drm->rc_model_size /
> +				       (dsc->drm->rc_model_size - dsc->drm->initial_offset);
> +
> +	slice_bits = 8 * dsc->drm->slice_chunk_size * dsc->drm->slice_height;
> +
> +	groups_total = groups_per_line * dsc->drm->slice_height;
> +
> +	data = dsc->drm->first_line_bpg_offset * 2048;
> +
> +	dsc->drm->nfl_bpg_offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(data, (dsc->drm->slice_height 
> - 1));
> +
> +	pre_num_extra_mux_bits = 3 * (mux_words_size + (4 *
> dsc->drm->bits_per_component + 4) - 2);
> +
> +	num_extra_mux_bits = pre_num_extra_mux_bits - (mux_words_size -
> +			     ((slice_bits - pre_num_extra_mux_bits) % mux_words_size));
> +
> +	data = 2048 * (dsc->drm->rc_model_size - dsc->drm->initial_offset +
> num_extra_mux_bits);
> +	dsc->drm->slice_bpg_offset = DIV_ROUND_UP(data, groups_total);
> +
> +	/* bpp * 16 + 0.5 */
> +	data = dsc->drm->bits_per_pixel * 16;
> +	data *= 2;
> +	data++;
> +	data /= 2;
> +	target_bpp_x16 = data;
> +
> +	data = (dsc->drm->initial_xmit_delay * target_bpp_x16) / 16;
> +	final_value =  dsc->drm->rc_model_size - data + num_extra_mux_bits;
As we discussed, can you please check why there is an additional + 8 and 
/16 in the upstream final_offset calculation?
If we can eliminate or root-cause the difference in the calculations, 
either this patch can be substantially reduced or
we will atleast know for future reference what was the delta and can 
leave a comment.
> +	dsc->drm->final_offset = final_value;
> +
> +	final_scale = 8 * dsc->drm->rc_model_size / (dsc->drm->rc_model_size
> - final_value);
> +
> +
> +	data = (final_scale - 9) * (dsc->drm->nfl_bpg_offset +
> dsc->drm->slice_bpg_offset);
> +	dsc->drm->scale_increment_interval = (2048 * dsc->drm->final_offset) 
> / data;
> +
> +	dsc->drm->scale_decrement_interval = groups_per_line /
> (dsc->drm->initial_scale_value - 8);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int dsi_host_parse_dt(struct msm_dsi_host *msm_host)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &msm_host->pdev->dev;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> index 2668941df529..65bff0176b66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_plane_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_probe_helper.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_fb_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_dsc.h>
>  #include <drm/msm_drm.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_gem.h>
> 
> @@ -134,6 +135,23 @@ struct msm_drm_thread {
>  	struct kthread_worker *worker;
>  };
> 
> +/* DSC config */
> +struct msm_display_dsc_config {
> +	struct drm_dsc_config *drm;
> +	u8 scr_rev;
Can scr_rev also move into drm_dsc_config? SCR itself is not QC 
specific. Its just telling there was a change request
for that DSC revision.
In QC side, we only use this scr_rev to have some different tables. This 
can even be true for other vendors.
So moving this to drm_dsc_config will only help.
> +
> +	u32 initial_lines;
> +	u32 pkt_per_line;
> +	u32 bytes_in_slice;
> +	u32 bytes_per_pkt;
> +	u32 eol_byte_num;
> +	u32 pclk_per_line;
> +	u32 slice_last_group_size;
> +	u32 det_thresh_flatness;
> +	u32 extra_width;
> +	u32 pps_delay_ms;
> +};
> +
>  struct msm_drm_private {
> 
>  	struct drm_device *dev;
> @@ -227,6 +245,9 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
>  	/* Properties */
>  	struct drm_property *plane_property[PLANE_PROP_MAX_NUM];
> 
> +	/* DSC configuration */
> +	struct msm_display_dsc_config *dsc;
> +
>  	/* VRAM carveout, used when no IOMMU: */
>  	struct {
>  		unsigned long size;