All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: TEMP: Round of the carve out memory requested to section_size
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:12:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c524b899151fbbf9dedebe7f796bd59a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gxaamzm8i=ZcCU+99NnA6dDgi6H0GJwVtSmYWjPcyk5WQ@mail.gmail.com>

[..]
> > memblock_steal tries to reserve physical memory during boot.
> > When the requested size is not aligned on the section size
> > then, the remaining memory available for lowmem becomes
> > unaligned on the section boundary. There is a issue with this,
> > which is discussed in the thread below.
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/28/112
> >
> > The final conclusion from the thread seems to
> > be align the memblock_steal calls on the SECTION boundary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
> Why is the TEMP in the subject line. From patch it doesn't be
> temporary version. Can you please clarify that ?
>
 Oops, that was a mistake. Reposted by correcting it.

Thanks,
 Sricharan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: r.sricharan@ti.com (Sricharan R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: TEMP: Round of the carve out memory requested to section_size
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:12:32 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c524b899151fbbf9dedebe7f796bd59a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gxaamzm8i=ZcCU+99NnA6dDgi6H0GJwVtSmYWjPcyk5WQ@mail.gmail.com>

[..]
> > memblock_steal tries to reserve physical memory during boot.
> > When the requested size is not aligned on the section size
> > then, the remaining memory available for lowmem becomes
> > unaligned on the section boundary. There is a issue with this,
> > which is discussed in the thread below.
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/28/112
> >
> > The final conclusion from the thread seems to
> > be align the memblock_steal calls on the SECTION boundary.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: R Sricharan <r.sricharan@ti.com>
> Why is the TEMP in the subject line. From patch it doesn't be
> temporary version. Can you please clarify that ?
>
 Oops, that was a mistake. Reposted by correcting it.

Thanks,
 Sricharan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-12  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-12  5:51 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: TEMP: Round of the carve out memory requested to section_size R Sricharan
2012-09-12  5:51 ` R Sricharan
2012-09-12  5:58 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-12  5:58   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-12  8:42   ` Sricharan R [this message]
2012-09-12  8:42     ` Sricharan R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c524b899151fbbf9dedebe7f796bd59a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=r.sricharan@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.