From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@google.com>
Cc: rohkumar@qti.qualcomm.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
bgoswami@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, plai@codeaurora.org,
tiwai@suse.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Matthias Reichl <hias@horus.com>,
Rohit kumar <rohitkr@codeaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, asishb@codeaurora.org,
Ajit Pandey <ajitp@codeaurora.org>,
Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>,
Dylan Reid <dgreid@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix null pointer dereference in soc_find_component
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:11:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6721670-cf89-5d21-953d-c1fa10d87367@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOReqxjLcdN6rT9w3_6MJaqE-hpiCsZ+3Luic+e793GwPde+Qg@mail.gmail.com>
> The issue was that we were seeing a memory corruption bug on an AMD
> chromebooks with that function already (not observed on Intel). I was
> testing some SOF integrations and was seeing this in the kernel logs.
> I had Dylan verify my logic before I sent the patch because it took so
> long to identify the bug and it was traced to the patch that introduce
> soc_init_platform.
>
> [ 10.922112] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: CPU DAI
> designware-i2s.1.auto not registered
> [ 10.922122] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00:
> devm_snd_soc_register_card(acpd7219m98357) failed: -517
> [ 11.001411] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: Both platform
> name/of_node are set for amd-max98357-play
> [ 11.001423] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00: ASoC: failed to init
> link amd-max98357-play
> [ 11.001431] cz-da7219-max98357a AMD7219:00:
> devm_snd_soc_register_card(acpd7219m98357) failed: -22
> [ 11.001577] cz-da7219-max98357a: probe of AMD7219:00 failed with error -22
>
> of_node was never getting set but the pointer was becoming populated
> (outside of the probe call) which traced to soc_init_platform function
> which was not reallocating memory on a EPROBE_DEFER even though it was
> getting freed by devm. I am not very familiar with devm but my local
> maintainers say that it should be freeing the memory even on a
> PROBE_DEFER.
> The patch should mirror the memory behaviour in
> snd_soc_init_multicodec which also reallocates its memory on every
> probe. I'm not sure how the patch is causing you to defer, is your
> component list corrupt?
>
> Sorry for the duplicate spam, forgot to send via plain text mode,
> re-sending for the mailing list so it gets accepted.
There is no defer issue with the intel stuff, but we call this routine
multiple times
snd_soc_register_card
--soc_init_dai_link
----snd_soc_init_platform
-- soc_soc_bind_card
----snd_soc_instantiate_card
------ soc_check_tplg_fes
-------- snd_soc_init_platform << ALLOC1
--------soc_init_dai_link
----------snd_soc_init_platform << ALLOC2
Initially dai_link->legacy_platform is 0, so gets set after the first
first devm_kzalloc (ALLOC1) and after that we always allocate new memory
(ALLOC2). The end result is that whatever we set in soc_check_tplg_fes
is lost with the new/unnecessary alloc.
I would guess your solution is also a work-around, if devm_ effectively
freed the memory then the pointer would become NULL. Or may that's the
issue is that no one actually resets it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-22 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-11 8:14 [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Fix null pointer dereference in soc_find_component Rohit kumar
2019-01-11 15:44 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-11 21:49 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-12 6:07 ` Rohit kumar
2019-01-14 15:40 ` [alsa-devel] " Liam Girdwood
2019-01-15 0:06 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 3:08 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 19:35 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 21:07 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 21:11 ` Matthias Reichl
2019-01-15 21:16 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-15 21:41 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-15 21:48 ` [alsa-devel] " Matthias Reichl
2019-01-18 23:02 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-19 1:12 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-19 1:15 ` [alsa-devel] " Curtis Malainey
2019-01-21 18:30 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-22 20:11 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2019-01-23 1:36 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-23 2:01 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-24 18:44 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-24 19:07 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-01-24 19:26 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-25 1:32 ` Curtis Malainey
2019-01-21 19:17 ` Mark Brown
2019-01-14 23:26 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6721670-cf89-5d21-953d-c1fa10d87367@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ajitp@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=asishb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bgoswami@codeaurora.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@chromium.org \
--cc=cujomalainey@google.com \
--cc=dgreid@google.com \
--cc=hias@horus.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=plai@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rohitkr@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rohkumar@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.