Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add VCP support for mt8196

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 14/09/2025 14:29, Xiangzhi Tang wrote:
> Add the new binding document for MediaTek Video Companion
> Processor(VCP) on MediaTek mt8196.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiangzhi Tang <xiangzhi.tang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  .../remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml       | 165 ++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 165 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..71a55943843b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/mediatek,mt8196-vcp.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: MediaTek Video Companion Processor (VCP)
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Xiangzhi Tang <Xiangzhi.Tang@mediatek.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  The MediaTek VCP enables the SoC control the MediaTek Video Companion Risc-V coprocessor.

You keep ignoring comments.

> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    enum:
> +      - mediatek,mt8196-vcp
> +
> +  reg:
> +    items:
> +      - description: sram base
> +      - description: cfg group IO
> +      - description: cfg core group IO
> +      - description: cfg sec group IO
> +      - description: vcp rdy group IO
> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: sram

Why would sram be the first, main address of this device? Not the
address space responsible for configuring it?

> +      - const: cfg
> +      - const: cfg_core
> +      - const: cfg_sec
> +      - const: vcp_vlp_ao_rsvd7
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  mboxes:
> +    maxItems: 5
> +
> +  mbox-names:
> +    maxItems: 5

Not much improved, more ignored comments and since the changelog is so
vague I am afraid you just skimmed through the comments and you just
ignored many of them.

Implement entire feedback and provide detailed changelog.

Best regards,
Krzysztof