* [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames
@ 2025-04-02 16:03 Zhen XIN
2025-04-06 20:30 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-04-07 3:30 ` Ping-Ke Shih
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Zhen XIN @ 2025-04-02 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless; +Cc: pkshih, linux-kernel, martin.blumenstingl, Zhen XIN
Rtl8732ds doesn't work in AP-Mode due to the missing tx status for management frames
This patch enables tx status report for all tx skbs
Signed-off-by: Zhen XIN <zhen.xin@nokia-sbell.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
index e024061bdbf7..84f71e13b5ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
@@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static int rtw_sdio_request_irq(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
}
static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ struct sk_buff *skb, enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue)
{
struct rtw_sdio_tx_data *tx_data = rtw_sdio_get_tx_data(skb);
struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
@@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
skb_pull(skb, rtwdev->chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz);
/* enqueue to wait for tx report */
- if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) {
+ if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS && queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO) {
rtw_tx_report_enqueue(rtwdev, skb, tx_data->sn);
return;
}
@@ -1227,10 +1227,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_process_tx_queue(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
return;
}
- if (queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO)
- rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(rtwdev, skb);
- else
- dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+ rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(rtwdev, skb, queue);
}
static void rtw_sdio_tx_handler(struct work_struct *work)
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames
2025-04-02 16:03 [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames Zhen XIN
@ 2025-04-06 20:30 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-04-07 3:30 ` Ping-Ke Shih
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Blumenstingl @ 2025-04-06 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhen XIN, pkshih; +Cc: linux-wireless, linux-kernel
Hello,
thank you for sending the patch!
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 6:03 PM Zhen XIN <zhen.xin@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
>
> Rtl8732ds doesn't work in AP-Mode due to the missing tx status for management frames
> This patch enables tx status report for all tx skbs
Ping-Ke, there's a bit more discussion at [0]
Do you have any suggestions regarding the approach used here?
Best regards,
Martin
[0] https://github.com/lwfinger/rtw88/issues/245#issuecomment-2765046681
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames
2025-04-02 16:03 [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames Zhen XIN
2025-04-06 20:30 ` Martin Blumenstingl
@ 2025-04-07 3:30 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2025-04-07 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ping-Ke Shih @ 2025-04-07 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhen XIN, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
Hi Martin,
I replied original mail, because I think discussion would be clearer.
Zhen XIN <zhen.xin@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Rtl8732ds doesn't work in AP-Mode due to the missing tx status for management frames
> This patch enables tx status report for all tx skbs
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen XIN <zhen.xin@nokia-sbell.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
> index e024061bdbf7..84f71e13b5ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/sdio.c
> @@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ static int rtw_sdio_request_irq(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> }
>
> static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + struct sk_buff *skb, enum rtw_tx_queue_type queue)
> {
> struct rtw_sdio_tx_data *tx_data = rtw_sdio_get_tx_data(skb);
> struct ieee80211_tx_info *info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> skb_pull(skb, rtwdev->chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz);
>
> /* enqueue to wait for tx report */
> - if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) {
> + if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS && queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO) {
Is this because you have seen "failed to get tx report"?
Have you tried to increasing RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT?
If it still can't get TX report, we might take this workaround with comments
to mention why we need it. Or a local variable with proper naming to point out
this, like
bool queue_has_no_tx_report = queue > RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO;
By the way, USB behavior is very like to SDIO, but TX report seems to work well.
> rtw_tx_report_enqueue(rtwdev, skb, tx_data->sn);
> return;
> }
> @@ -1227,10 +1227,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_process_tx_queue(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO)
> - rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(rtwdev, skb);
> - else
> - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> + rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(rtwdev, skb, queue);
I think this change is reasonable, since skb via all kinds of queues could
set IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS.
> }
>
> static void rtw_sdio_tx_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> --
> 2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames
2025-04-07 3:30 ` Ping-Ke Shih
@ 2025-04-07 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-04-08 0:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Blumenstingl @ 2025-04-07 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ping-Ke Shih
Cc: Zhen XIN, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Hi Ping-Ke,
On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 5:30 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> I replied original mail, because I think discussion would be clearer.
makes sense, thank you!
[...]
> > @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > skb_pull(skb, rtwdev->chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz);
> >
> > /* enqueue to wait for tx report */
> > - if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) {
> > + if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS && queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO) {
>
> Is this because you have seen "failed to get tx report"?
> Have you tried to increasing RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT?
>
> If it still can't get TX report, we might take this workaround with comments
> to mention why we need it. Or a local variable with proper naming to point out
> this, like
>
> bool queue_has_no_tx_report = queue > RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO;
>
>
> By the way, USB behavior is very like to SDIO, but TX report seems to work well.
On my RTL8822CS I can confirm your thought:
I don't notice any extra "failed to get tx report" messages regardless
of whether I have "&& queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO" or not.
Best regards,
Martin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames
2025-04-07 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
@ 2025-04-08 0:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ping-Ke Shih @ 2025-04-08 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Blumenstingl
Cc: Zhen XIN, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ping-Ke,
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 5:30 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > I replied original mail, because I think discussion would be clearer.
> makes sense, thank you!
>
> [...]
> > > @@ -1195,7 +1195,7 @@ static void rtw_sdio_indicate_tx_status(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev,
> > > skb_pull(skb, rtwdev->chip->tx_pkt_desc_sz);
> > >
> > > /* enqueue to wait for tx report */
> > > - if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS) {
> > > + if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_REQ_TX_STATUS && queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO) {
> >
> > Is this because you have seen "failed to get tx report"?
> > Have you tried to increasing RTW_TX_PROBE_TIMEOUT?
> >
> > If it still can't get TX report, we might take this workaround with comments
> > to mention why we need it. Or a local variable with proper naming to point out
> > this, like
> >
> > bool queue_has_no_tx_report = queue > RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO;
> >
> >
> > By the way, USB behavior is very like to SDIO, but TX report seems to work well.
> On my RTL8822CS I can confirm your thought:
> I don't notice any extra "failed to get tx report" messages regardless
> of whether I have "&& queue <= RTW_TX_QUEUE_VO" or not.
>
This workaround might need an chip attribute to enable then.
Not sure if people in the GitHub thread have experiments on all
supported SDIO WiFi chips.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-08 0:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-02 16:03 [RFC -v1] wifi: rtw88: sdio: Tx status for management frames Zhen XIN
2025-04-06 20:30 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-04-07 3:30 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2025-04-07 21:04 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2025-04-08 0:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.