From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
To: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com>,
Fan Chen <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] soc: mediatek: extend bus protection API
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca39cefb-7ab2-dc6a-8fd6-04a440cf20bb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508381330-3700-7-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
On 10/19/2017 04:48 AM, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> MT2712 add "set/clear" bus control register to each control register set
> instead of providing only one "enable" control register, we could avoid
> the read-modify-write racing by using extend API with such new design.
> By improving the mtk-infracfg bus protection implementation to
> support set/clear bus protection control method by IC configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> index dba3055..344ffba 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> @@ -19,23 +19,32 @@
>
> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN 0x0220
> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1 0x0228
> +#define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET 0x0260
> +#define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR 0x0264
>
> /**
> * mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection - enable bus protection
> * @regmap: The infracfg regmap
> * @mask: The mask containing the protection bits to be enabled.
> + * @use_reg_set: The boolean flag determines to set the protection bits
> + * by set register or enable register
Huh, I thought it does or write the whole register or just enables the necessary
bits.
> *
> * This function enables the bus protection bits for disabled power
> * domains so that the system does not hang when some unit accesses the
> * bus while in power down.
> */
> -int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> +int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_set)
Please rename the variable to something that makes you understand what it does.
Actually I find it easier to swap the if statement and use reg_update as
variable name.
> {
> unsigned long expired;
> u32 val;
> int ret;
>
> - regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, mask);
> + if (use_reg_set)
> + regmap_write(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask,
> + mask);
>
> expired = jiffies + HZ;
>
> @@ -59,16 +68,23 @@ int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> * mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection - disable bus protection
> * @regmap: The infracfg regmap
> * @mask: The mask containing the protection bits to be disabled.
> + * @use_reg_clr: The boolean flag determines to clear the protection bits
> + * by clear register or enable register
same here.
> *
> * This function disables the bus protection bits previously enabled with
> * mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection.
> */
> -int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> +
> +int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_clr)
same here.
> {
> unsigned long expired;
> int ret;
>
> - regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, 0);
> + if (use_reg_clr)
> + regmap_write(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, 0);
>
> expired = jiffies + HZ;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index e1ce8b1..ebee3e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct scp {
> void __iomem *base;
> struct regmap *infracfg;
> struct scp_ctrl_reg ctrl_reg;
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
> };
>
> struct scp_subdomain {
> @@ -147,6 +148,7 @@ struct scp_soc_data {
> const struct scp_subdomain *subdomains;
> int num_subdomains;
> const struct scp_ctrl_reg regs;
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
bus_prot_reg_update or something like this?
Thanks,
Matthias
> };
>
> static int scpsys_domain_is_on(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> @@ -254,7 +256,8 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>
> if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask);
> + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,z
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (ret)
> goto err_pwr_ack;
> }
> @@ -289,7 +292,8 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>
> if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask);
> + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -382,7 +386,8 @@ static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk)
>
> static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num,
> - const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg)
> + const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg,
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg)
> {
> struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
> struct resource *res;
> @@ -397,6 +402,8 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta_offs;
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta2nd_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta2nd_offs;
>
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
> +
> scp->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -816,7 +823,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt6797_data = {
> @@ -827,7 +835,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_MT6797,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND_MT6797
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt7622_data = {
> @@ -836,7 +845,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt8173_data = {
> @@ -847,7 +857,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -884,7 +895,8 @@ static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> match = of_match_device(of_scpsys_match_tbl, &pdev->dev);
> soc = (const struct scp_soc_data *)match->data;
>
> - scp = init_scp(pdev, soc->domains, soc->num_domains, &soc->regs);
> + scp = init_scp(pdev, soc->domains, soc->num_domains, &soc->regs,
> + soc->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (IS_ERR(scp))
> return PTR_ERR(scp);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> index a0182ec..7df0fc8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> #define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_WB (BIT(2) | BIT(6) | \
> BIT(7) | BIT(8))
>
> -int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
> -int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
> -
> +int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_set);
> +int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_clr);
> #endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_INFRACFG_H */
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 6/9] soc: mediatek: extend bus protection API
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ca39cefb-7ab2-dc6a-8fd6-04a440cf20bb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1508381330-3700-7-git-send-email-weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
On 10/19/2017 04:48 AM, Weiyi Lu wrote:
> MT2712 add "set/clear" bus control register to each control register set
> instead of providing only one "enable" control register, we could avoid
> the read-modify-write racing by using extend API with such new design.
> By improving the mtk-infracfg bus protection implementation to
> support set/clear bus protection control method by IC configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h | 7 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> index dba3055..344ffba 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-infracfg.c
> @@ -19,23 +19,32 @@
>
> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN 0x0220
> #define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1 0x0228
> +#define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET 0x0260
> +#define INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR 0x0264
>
> /**
> * mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection - enable bus protection
> * @regmap: The infracfg regmap
> * @mask: The mask containing the protection bits to be enabled.
> + * @use_reg_set: The boolean flag determines to set the protection bits
> + * by set register or enable register
Huh, I thought it does or write the whole register or just enables the necessary
bits.
> *
> * This function enables the bus protection bits for disabled power
> * domains so that the system does not hang when some unit accesses the
> * bus while in power down.
> */
> -int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> +int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_set)
Please rename the variable to something that makes you understand what it does.
Actually I find it easier to swap the if statement and use reg_update as
variable name.
> {
> unsigned long expired;
> u32 val;
> int ret;
>
> - regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, mask);
> + if (use_reg_set)
> + regmap_write(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_SET, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask,
> + mask);
>
> expired = jiffies + HZ;
>
> @@ -59,16 +68,23 @@ int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> * mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection - disable bus protection
> * @regmap: The infracfg regmap
> * @mask: The mask containing the protection bits to be disabled.
> + * @use_reg_clr: The boolean flag determines to clear the protection bits
> + * by clear register or enable register
same here.
> *
> * This function disables the bus protection bits previously enabled with
> * mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection.
> */
> -int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask)
> +
> +int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_clr)
same here.
> {
> unsigned long expired;
> int ret;
>
> - regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, 0);
> + if (use_reg_clr)
> + regmap_write(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN_CLR, mask);
> + else
> + regmap_update_bits(infracfg, INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, mask, 0);
>
> expired = jiffies + HZ;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> index e1ce8b1..ebee3e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> @@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ struct scp {
> void __iomem *base;
> struct regmap *infracfg;
> struct scp_ctrl_reg ctrl_reg;
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
> };
>
> struct scp_subdomain {
> @@ -147,6 +148,7 @@ struct scp_soc_data {
> const struct scp_subdomain *subdomains;
> int num_subdomains;
> const struct scp_ctrl_reg regs;
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
bus_prot_reg_update or something like this?
Thanks,
Matthias
> };
>
> static int scpsys_domain_is_on(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> @@ -254,7 +256,8 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>
> if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask);
> + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,z
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (ret)
> goto err_pwr_ack;
> }
> @@ -289,7 +292,8 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
>
> if (scpd->data->bus_prot_mask) {
> ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(scp->infracfg,
> - scpd->data->bus_prot_mask);
> + scpd->data->bus_prot_mask,
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -382,7 +386,8 @@ static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk)
>
> static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num,
> - const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg)
> + const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg,
> + bool bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg)
> {
> struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
> struct resource *res;
> @@ -397,6 +402,8 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta_offs;
> scp->ctrl_reg.pwr_sta2nd_offs = scp_ctrl_reg->pwr_sta2nd_offs;
>
> + scp->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg;
> +
> scp->dev = &pdev->dev;
>
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -816,7 +823,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt6797_data = {
> @@ -827,7 +835,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_MT6797,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND_MT6797
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt7622_data = {
> @@ -836,7 +845,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> static const struct scp_soc_data mt8173_data = {
> @@ -847,7 +857,8 @@ static void mtk_register_power_domains(struct platform_device *pdev,
> .regs = {
> .pwr_sta_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS,
> .pwr_sta2nd_offs = SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND
> - }
> + },
> + .bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg = false,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -884,7 +895,8 @@ static int scpsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> match = of_match_device(of_scpsys_match_tbl, &pdev->dev);
> soc = (const struct scp_soc_data *)match->data;
>
> - scp = init_scp(pdev, soc->domains, soc->num_domains, &soc->regs);
> + scp = init_scp(pdev, soc->domains, soc->num_domains, &soc->regs,
> + soc->bus_prot_use_set_clr_reg);
> if (IS_ERR(scp))
> return PTR_ERR(scp);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> index a0182ec..7df0fc8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/infracfg.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@
> #define MT7622_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_WB (BIT(2) | BIT(6) | \
> BIT(7) | BIT(8))
>
> -int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
> -int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask);
> -
> +int mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_set);
> +int mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(struct regmap *infracfg, u32 mask,
> + bool use_reg_clr);
> #endif /* __SOC_MEDIATEK_INFRACFG_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-19 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-19 2:48 [PATCH v5 0/9] Mediatek MT2712 clock and scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Document bindings for MT2712 Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] clk: mediatek: Add dt-bindings for MT2712 clocks Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] clk: mediatek: Add MT2712 clock support Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] arm: dts: mt2712: Add clock controller device nodes Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] dt-bindings: soc: add MT2712 power dt-bindings Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] soc: mediatek: extend bus protection API Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 17:20 ` Matthias Brugger [this message]
2017-10-19 17:20 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] soc: mediatek: add dependent clock jpgdec/audio for scpsys Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] soc: mediatek: add MT2712 scpsys support Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] arm: dts: Add power controller device node of MT2712 Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 2:48 ` Weiyi Lu
2017-10-19 17:06 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] Mediatek MT2712 clock and scpsys support Matthias Brugger
2017-10-19 17:06 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-10-19 17:06 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-10-24 8:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-24 8:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-25 8:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-10-25 8:38 ` Matthias Brugger
2017-10-25 8:38 ` Matthias Brugger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ca39cefb-7ab2-dc6a-8fd6-04a440cf20bb@gmail.com \
--to=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=jamesjj.liao@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=weiyi.lu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.