From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
efault@gmx.de, songliubraving@fb.com, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:10:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc686b67-73f4-606b-9df3-3fe63d85195a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180620195652.27251-2-riel@surriel.com>
On 06/20/2018 12:56 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> /*
> - * FIXME! The "sizeof(struct mm_struct)" currently includes the
> - * whole struct cpumask for the OFFSTACK case. We could change
> - * this to *only* allocate as much of it as required by the
> - * maximum number of CPU's we can ever have. The cpumask_allocation
> - * is at the end of the structure, exactly for that reason.
> + * The mm_cpumask is located at the end of mm_struct, and is
> + * dynamically sized based on nr_cpu_ids.
> */
> + mm_size = sizeof(struct mm_struct) + cpumask_size();
> +
> mm_cachep = kmem_cache_create_usercopy("mm_struct",
> - sizeof(struct mm_struct), ARCH_MIN_MMSTRUCT_ALIGN,
> + mm_size, ARCH_MIN_MMSTRUCT_ALIGN,
Could you add a bit to that comment, like "dynamically sized based on
nr_cpu_ids" ... which is sized based on the number of possible CPUs.
I found myself wondering how that interacts with hotplug.
t mm_struct, saved_auxv),
> diff --git a/mm/init-mm.c b/mm/init-mm.c
> index f94d5d15ebc0..20fe222fe4c0 100644
> --- a/mm/init-mm.c
> +++ b/mm/init-mm.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@
> #define INIT_MM_CONTEXT(name)
> #endif
>
> +/*
> + * For dynamically allocated mm_structs, there is a dynamically sized cpumask
> + * at the end of the structure, the size of which depends on nr_cpu_ids. That...
Similar nit. Instead of calling out the variable alone, could we just
say what it means logically and then reference the variable?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-22 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-20 19:56 [PATCH 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 21:32 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-21 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-21 0:24 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-22 15:10 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2018-06-22 17:45 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86,tlb: leave lazy TLB mode at page table free time Rik van Riel
2018-06-21 0:23 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 14:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:17 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86,tlb: change tlbstate.is_lazy to tlbstate.state Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 17:01 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-22 17:08 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86,tlb: make lazy TLB mode lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:15 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-22 17:16 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86,tlb: only send page table free TLB flush to lazy TLB CPUs Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 17:23 ` Dave Hansen
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86,mm: always use lazy TLB mode Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 19:56 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86,idle: do not leave mm in idle state Rik van Riel
2018-06-20 22:20 ` kbuild test robot
2018-06-21 0:25 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 15:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 15:53 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 16:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-22 20:18 ` Rik van Riel
2018-06-22 22:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-06-23 0:55 ` Rik van Riel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-29 14:29 [PATCH v3 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-06-29 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-06-30 4:30 ` kbuild test robot
2018-07-06 21:56 [PATCH v4 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-07 8:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-07 21:25 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-08 14:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-08 14:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-09 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 3:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-10 14:28 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-10 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-07-15 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-15 23:50 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 1:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-07-16 19:03 [PATCH v6 0/7] x86,tlb,mm: make lazy TLB mode even lazier Rik van Riel
2018-07-16 19:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: allocate mm_cpumask dynamically based on nr_cpu_ids Rik van Riel
2018-08-04 22:28 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc686b67-73f4-606b-9df3-3fe63d85195a@linux.intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.