Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Hari Prasath G E <gehariprasath@ti.com>]

On 8/28/2026 7:48 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 8/28/26 3:09 AM, Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango wrote:
>> TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
>> present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
>> so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel- 
>> headers-dev
>> package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default- 
>> image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
>> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
>>   DEVTOOLS = " \
>>       linux-libc-headers-dev \
>> +    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \
> 
> What application(s) actually need this header file, shouldn't they
> add it to their DEPENDS line instead of unconditionally installing
> for this image? (and why only this image, we have other images
> folks build on)
> 
> Andrew

The application that requires this header doesn't reside in meta-arago 
layer. I don't think it resides in the meta-edgeai layer either.Maybe 
Sourabh or Puyush can confirm how they are compiling this application.

The ADAS image uses the tisdk-default-image, so I have done this change 
only to this. I cross-verified with the processor SDK folks.

Regards,
Hari

> 
>>       build-essential \
>>       packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
>>       git \
>