[meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango]

TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev
package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.

Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
---
 meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
--- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
+++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
 
 DEVTOOLS = " \
     linux-libc-headers-dev \
+    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \
     build-essential \
     packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
     git \
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[PRC Automation]

meta-arago / na / 20260828080918.1161144-1-gehariprasath

PRC Results: FAIL

=========================================================
  check-yocto-patches: PASS
=========================================================
Patches
----------------------------------------
All patches passed



=========================================================
  apply-yocto-patch: PASS
=========================================================
scarthgap
=====================
Summary:
- Patch Series: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS
- Submitter: From: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
- Date: Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:39:18 +0530
- Num Patches: 1
- Mailing List (public inbox) Commit SHA: d15089d5184c0a594494b6c45048ceb95059d136

Applied to:
- Repository: lcpd-prc-meta-arago
- Base Branch: scarthgap-wip
- Commit Author: Ryan Eatmon <reatmon@ti.com>
- Commit Subject: libyang: Fix CVE-2026-41401
- Commit SHA: 73ab0405254988a501b849d221acf5f468cb8997

Patches
----------------------------------------
All patches applied



=========================================================
  check-yocto-repo: FAIL
=========================================================
scarthgap
=====================
FAIL
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-connectivity/hostap/hostap-daemon-wl18xx/0001-hostapd-change-conf-file-for-better-oob-startup.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-connectivity/open62541/open62541/0001-CMakeLists-do-not-install-git-directories.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-connectivity/open62541/open62541/0001-tests-fix-typing-of-size_t-in-printf.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-devtools/abseil-cpp/abseil-cpp/0001-absl-always-use-asm-sgidefs.h.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-devtools/abseil-cpp/abseil-cpp/0002-Remove-maes-option-from-cross-compilation.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-devtools/abseil-cpp/abseil-cpp/0003-Remove-neon-option-from-cross-compilation.patch
    
    ERROR: Patch is not referenced in any recipe. (REPO-1)
        meta-arago-extras/recipes-extended/sysrepo/libyang/CVE-2026-41401.patch
    
    For details on the above errors/warnings visit: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-ti/wiki/40887

Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Andrew Davis]

On 8/28/26 3:09 AM, Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango wrote:
> TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
> present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
> so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev
> package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
> ---
>   meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
>   
>   DEVTOOLS = " \
>       linux-libc-headers-dev \
> +    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \

What application(s) actually need this header file, shouldn't they
add it to their DEPENDS line instead of unconditionally installing
for this image? (and why only this image, we have other images
folks build on)

Andrew

>       build-essential \
>       packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
>       git \

Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 09:18:55AM -0500, Andrew Davis via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On 8/28/26 3:09 AM, Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango wrote:
> >TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
> >present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
> >so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev
> >package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
> >---
> >  meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> >diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> >index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
> >--- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> >+++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
> >@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
> >  DEVTOOLS = " \
> >      linux-libc-headers-dev \
> >+    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \
> 
> What application(s) actually need this header file, shouldn't they
> add it to their DEPENDS line instead of unconditionally installing
> for this image? (and why only this image, we have other images
> folks build on)

tisdk-default-image is the only image that enables on-target development, 
hence it installs compiler, headers, debug tools, etc. into the rootfs to be 
used during runtime. For build time, the corresponding application should 
indeed list required headers in DEPENDS.


> >      build-essential \
> >      packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
> >      git \

Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Hari Prasath G E]

On 8/28/2026 7:48 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
> On 8/28/26 3:09 AM, Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango wrote:
>> TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
>> present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
>> so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel- 
>> headers-dev
>> package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default- 
>> image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
>> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
>>   DEVTOOLS = " \
>>       linux-libc-headers-dev \
>> +    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \
> 
> What application(s) actually need this header file, shouldn't they
> add it to their DEPENDS line instead of unconditionally installing
> for this image? (and why only this image, we have other images
> folks build on)
> 
> Andrew

The application that requires this header doesn't reside in meta-arago 
layer. I don't think it resides in the meta-edgeai layer either.Maybe 
Sourabh or Puyush can confirm how they are compiling this application.

The ADAS image uses the tisdk-default-image, so I have done this change 
only to this. I cross-verified with the processor SDK folks.

Regards,
Hari

> 
>>       build-essential \
>>       packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
>>       git \
> 

Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] tisdk-default-image: add ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev to DEVTOOLS

[Hari Prasath G E]

On 8/29/2026 8:37 AM, Hari Prasath via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On 8/28/2026 7:48 PM, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> On 8/28/26 3:09 AM, Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango wrote:
>>> TI vendor kernel uapi additions (e.g. DMA_HEAP_IOCTL_EXPORT) isn't
>>> present in the standard header provided by the linux-libc-headers,
>>> so on-target compilation against them needs the ti-vendor-kernel- 
>>> headers-dev
>>> package alongside linux-libc-headers-dev.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath Gujulan Elango <gehariprasath@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default- 
>>> image.bb b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>>> index 264d1b2d..cac6628e 100644
>>> --- a/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>>> +++ b/meta-arago-distro/recipes-core/images/tisdk-default-image.bb
>>> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ IMAGE_FSTYPES:remove:omapl138 = "ubifs ubi"
>>>   DEVTOOLS = " \
>>>       linux-libc-headers-dev \
>>> +    ti-vendor-kernel-headers-dev \
>>
>> What application(s) actually need this header file, shouldn't they
>> add it to their DEPENDS line instead of unconditionally installing
>> for this image? (and why only this image, we have other images
>> folks build on)
>>
>> Andrew
> 
> The application that requires this header doesn't reside in meta-arago 
> layer. I don't think it resides in the meta-edgeai layer either.Maybe 
> Sourabh or Puyush can confirm how they are compiling this application.
> 
> The ADAS image uses the tisdk-default-image, so I have done this change 
> only to this. I cross-verified with the processor SDK folks.
> 
> Regards,
> Hari
> 

It's the ti-vision-apps recipe in meta-edgeai that seems to need this 
header.

https://bitbucket.itg.ti.com/projects/PROCESSOR-SDK-VISION/repos/meta-edgeai/browse/recipes-tisdk/ti-psdk-rtos/ti-vision-apps.bb

- Hari

>>
>>>       build-essential \
>>>       packagegroup-core-tools-debug \
>>>       git \
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#17623): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/ 
> message/17623
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/120969416/10119719
> Group Owner: meta-arago+owner@lists.yoctoproject.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-arago/unsub 
> [gehariprasath@ti.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-