From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Jitao Shi" <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nícolas F . R . A . Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
"Stu Hsieh" <stu.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Nancy . Lin" <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: fix possible_crtcs calculation
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:58:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf7d01700f5e5adf2f28b0376451143b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e6917d-7315-12d6-d7d4-dc7ea8c58dc9@collabora.com>
> At this point, I think that it would be sane to change this function to
> return a signed type, so that we can return -ENOENT if we couldn't find
> any DDP path (so, if we couldn't find any possible crtc).
Fair enough, but should it be part of the fixes commit or a different
one?
-michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: "Nícolas F . R . A . Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
"Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Nancy . Lin" <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>,
"Jitao Shi" <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
"Stu Hsieh" <stu.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: fix possible_crtcs calculation
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:58:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf7d01700f5e5adf2f28b0376451143b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e6917d-7315-12d6-d7d4-dc7ea8c58dc9@collabora.com>
> At this point, I think that it would be sane to change this function to
> return a signed type, so that we can return -ENOENT if we couldn't find
> any DDP path (so, if we couldn't find any possible crtc).
Fair enough, but should it be part of the fixes commit or a different
one?
-michael
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Jitao Shi" <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
"Nícolas F . R . A . Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>,
"Stu Hsieh" <stu.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Nancy . Lin" <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: fix possible_crtcs calculation
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:58:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf7d01700f5e5adf2f28b0376451143b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e6917d-7315-12d6-d7d4-dc7ea8c58dc9@collabora.com>
> At this point, I think that it would be sane to change this function to
> return a signed type, so that we can return -ENOENT if we couldn't find
> any DDP path (so, if we couldn't find any possible crtc).
Fair enough, but should it be part of the fixes commit or a different
one?
-michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Cc: "Nícolas F . R . A . Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>,
"Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"Philipp Zabel" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"Nancy . Lin" <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>,
"Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@public-files.de>,
"Jitao Shi" <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>,
"Stu Hsieh" <stu.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: fix possible_crtcs calculation
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2023 09:58:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cf7d01700f5e5adf2f28b0376451143b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7e6917d-7315-12d6-d7d4-dc7ea8c58dc9@collabora.com>
> At this point, I think that it would be sane to change this function to
> return a signed type, so that we can return -ENOENT if we couldn't find
> any DDP path (so, if we couldn't find any possible crtc).
Fair enough, but should it be part of the fixes commit or a different
one?
-michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-05 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-01 17:45 [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/mediatek: fix kernel oops if no crtc is found Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: fix possible_crtcs calculation Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-01 17:45 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-05 7:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:55 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:58 ` Michael Walle [this message]
2023-09-05 7:58 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-05 7:58 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-05 7:58 ` Michael Walle
2023-09-05 8:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 8:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 8:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 8:03 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:50 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/mediatek: fix kernel oops if no crtc is found AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:50 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:50 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-09-05 7:50 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cf7d01700f5e5adf2f28b0376451143b@kernel.org \
--to=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nancy.lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=stu.hsieh@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.