From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels@cistron.nl>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Major XFS problems...
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:54:02 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <chv3ia$lnu$1@news.cistron.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040911133812.GC32755@krispykreme
In article <20040911133812.GC32755@krispykreme>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:
>
>> In my expierence XFS, was right after JFS the worst and the slowest
>> filesystem ever made.
>
>On our NFS benchmarks JFS is _significantly_ faster than ext3 and
>reiserfs. It depends on your workload but calling JFS the worst and
>slowest filesystem ever made is unfair.
Same goes for XFS. In the application I use it for it is by _far_
the fastest filesystem, whereas reiser is by far the slowest.
ext3 is somewhere in between.
And that's because XFS has extents and does pre-allocation.
Mike.
--
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes
a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-11 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-08 12:35 Major XFS problems Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 15:04 ` Anando Bhattacharya
2004-09-08 15:44 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 16:36 ` Greg Banks
2004-09-08 17:30 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-09 2:42 ` Greg Banks
2004-09-08 19:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-09 3:23 ` Greg Banks
2004-09-09 14:00 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-10 2:40 ` Greg Banks
2004-09-10 3:04 ` Kyle Moffett
2004-09-10 3:24 ` Greg Banks
2004-09-13 7:29 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-17 11:26 ` [PATCH] " Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-29 21:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-08 16:16 ` Jan-Frode Myklebust
2004-09-08 21:40 ` Nathan Scott
2004-09-08 23:22 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 23:42 ` Nathan Scott
2004-09-09 12:11 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-09 18:09 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-11 11:39 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-09-11 13:03 ` Bjoern Brauel
2004-09-11 13:38 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-11 14:54 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg [this message]
2004-09-11 18:20 ` Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz
2004-09-11 13:58 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-08 13:07 Piszcz, Justin Michael
2004-09-08 13:26 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2004-09-08 15:24 Piszcz, Justin Michael
[not found] <20040908133954.GB390@unthought.net>
[not found] ` <20040909074533.B3958243@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com>
[not found] ` <413F823F.3020507@xfs.org>
2004-09-09 6:52 ` Dave Chinner
2004-09-09 8:10 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] <2Ca3I-2kY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2Cdl9-4Pc-65@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-11 9:21 ` ADH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='chv3ia$lnu$1@news.cistron.nl' \
--to=miquels@cistron.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.