From: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
To: linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, w@1wt.eu, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove direct access to internal x86 descriptor fields
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:21:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1238361501.git.ice799@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi -
This patch set aims to remove the direct access to the 'a' and 'b' fields of 32-bit x86 descriptors. Static inline getters/setters are provided.
This is a resumbmit of a patch set I submitted several months ago[1]. My last patch set was a bit large, so I've tried to take a smaller bite this time and slowly build the cleanup effort over a series of patch sets.
Any and all comments, suggestions, and questions are welcome.
Thanks,
Joe Damato
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/24/459
---
Joe Damato (2):
x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors
x86: Replace direct access to descriptor fields with getter/setters
arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/tls.c | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
drivers/lguest/segments.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
drivers/pnp/pnpbios/bioscalls.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
To: linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, w@1wt.eu, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove direct access to internal x86 descriptor fields
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:21:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1238361501.git.ice799@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi -
This patch set aims to remove the direct access to the 'a' and 'b' fields of 32-bit x86 descriptors. Static inline getters/setters are provided.
This is a resumbmit of a patch set I submitted several months ago[1]. My last patch set was a bit large, so I've tried to take a smaller bite this time and slowly build the cleanup effort over a series of patch sets.
Any and all comments, suggestions, and questions are welcome.
Thanks,
Joe Damato
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/24/459
---
Joe Damato (2):
x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors
x86: Replace direct access to descriptor fields with getter/setters
arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/tls.c | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
drivers/lguest/segments.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
drivers/pnp/pnpbios/bioscalls.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
To: linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org, w@1wt.eu, mingo@elte.hu,
hpa@zytor.com, jeremy@goop.org, linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joe Damato <ice799@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove direct access to internal x86 descriptor fields
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:21:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1238361501.git.ice799@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi -
This patch set aims to remove the direct access to the 'a' and 'b' fields of 32-bit x86 descriptors. Static inline getters/setters are provided.
This is a resumbmit of a patch set I submitted several months ago[1]. My last patch set was a bit large, so I've tried to take a smaller bite this time and slowly build the cleanup effort over a series of patch sets.
Any and all comments, suggestions, and questions are welcome.
Thanks,
Joe Damato
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/24/459
---
Joe Damato (2):
x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors
x86: Replace direct access to descriptor fields with getter/setters
arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h | 5 +++--
arch/x86/kernel/tls.c | 6 ++++--
arch/x86/kernel/vmi_32.c | 3 ++-
arch/x86/lguest/boot.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_system.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
drivers/lguest/interrupts_and_traps.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
drivers/lguest/segments.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
drivers/pnp/pnpbios/bioscalls.c | 4 ++--
9 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-29 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-29 21:21 Joe Damato [this message]
2009-03-29 21:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86: Remove direct access to internal x86 descriptor fields Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Replace direct access to descriptor fields with getter/setters Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:21 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-29 21:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-29 21:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-29 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: Add getter/setter static inlines for x86 descriptors Joe Damato
2009-03-29 21:50 ` Joe Damato
2009-03-29 22:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-29 22:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-29 22:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1238361501.git.ice799@gmail.com \
--to=ice799@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.