From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:16:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1491562390.git.dcaratti@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34cSH+z+humkp5s7UHAqnafHHB-GTqobHyb-SfKNe+MiA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:06 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> You might even take this one step
> further. You could convert crc32_csum into a 1 bit enum for now.
> Basically you would use 0 for 1's compliement csum, and 1 to represent
> a crc32c csum. Then if we end up having to add another bit for
> something like FCoE in the future it would give us 4 possible checksum
> types instead of just giving us 1 with a bit mask.
On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 15:35 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Just create a non_ip_csum bit in skbuff.
> csum_bad can replaced with this I think. If the bit is set then more
> work can be done to differentiate between alternative checksums.
hello Alexander and Tom,
I refreshed the series including your suggestions.
Some followups are still possible:
* drivers that parse the packet header to correctly resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
(e.g. ixgbe_tx_csum()) can benefit from skb->csum_algo savng some CPU cycles
(e.g. avoiding calling ip_hdr(skb)->protocol or ixgbe_ipv6_csum_is_sctp(skb)).
* drivers that call skb_checksum_help() to resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL can
call skb_crc32c_csum_help (or skb_csum_hwoffload_help(skb, 0)) to avoid
wrong CRC on SCTP packets.
thank you in advance for looking at this!
regards,
--
davide
v3:
* review documentation
* include a fix for corrupted SCTP packets in openvswitch datapath
* skb->crc32c_csum renamed in skb->csum_algo and converted to enum
* deprecate skb->csum_bad to free one bit in struct sk_buff
* use 'CRC32c csum' terminology everywhere
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 16:16:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1491562390.git.dcaratti@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34cSH+z+humkp5s7UHAqnafHHB-GTqobHyb-SfKNe+MiA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 10:06 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> You might even take this one step
> further. You could convert crc32_csum into a 1 bit enum for now.
> Basically you would use 0 for 1's compliement csum, and 1 to represent
> a crc32c csum. Then if we end up having to add another bit for
> something like FCoE in the future it would give us 4 possible checksum
> types instead of just giving us 1 with a bit mask.
On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 15:35 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Just create a non_ip_csum bit in skbuff.
> csum_bad can replaced with this I think. If the bit is set then more
> work can be done to differentiate between alternative checksums.
hello Alexander and Tom,
I refreshed the series including your suggestions.
Some followups are still possible:
* drivers that parse the packet header to correctly resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL
(e.g. ixgbe_tx_csum()) can benefit from skb->csum_algo savng some CPU cycles
(e.g. avoiding calling ip_hdr(skb)->protocol or ixgbe_ipv6_csum_is_sctp(skb)).
* drivers that call skb_checksum_help() to resolve CHECKSUM_PARTIAL can
call skb_crc32c_csum_help (or skb_csum_hwoffload_help(skb, 0)) to avoid
wrong CRC on SCTP packets.
thank you in advance for looking at this!
regards,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-07 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 16:52 [RFC PATCH net-next 0/5] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/5] net: split skb_checksum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 20:59 ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-23 20:59 ` Tom Herbert
2017-01-24 16:35 ` David Laight
2017-01-24 16:35 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 15:07 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-02 15:07 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-02 16:55 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 16:55 ` David Laight
2017-02-02 18:08 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-02 18:08 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-27 13:39 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-27 13:39 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-27 15:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-27 15:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:31 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:31 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 1/4] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 22:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-02-28 22:46 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-01 3:17 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-01 3:17 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-01 10:53 ` David Laight
2017-03-01 10:53 ` David Laight
2017-03-06 21:51 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-06 21:51 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-07 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-07 18:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2017-03-18 13:17 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-18 13:17 ` Davide Caratti
2017-03-18 22:35 ` Tom Herbert
2017-03-18 22:35 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 0/7] improve CRC32c in the forwarding path Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 4/7] net: use skb->csum_algo to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 15:43 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 15:43 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 17:29 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 17:29 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 18:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 18:11 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-13 10:36 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-13 10:36 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 0/7] net: improve support for SCTP checksums Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-27 12:41 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 1/7] skbuff: add stub to help computing crc32c on SCTP packets Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 2/7] net: introduce skb_crc32c_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 12:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-27 12:29 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-27 1:34 ` [sk_buff] 95510aef27: BUG:Bad_page_state_in_process kernel test robot
2017-04-27 1:34 ` kernel test robot
2017-04-29 20:21 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 3/7] sk_buff: remove support for csum_bad in sk_buff Tom Herbert
2017-04-29 20:21 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 4/7] net: use skb->csum_not_inet to identify packets needing crc32c Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:18 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-29 20:18 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v4 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-04-20 13:38 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-29 20:20 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-29 20:20 ` Tom Herbert
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 5/7] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 6/7] openvswitch: more accurate checksumming in queue_userspace_packet() Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v3 7/7] sk_buff.h: improve description of CHECKSUM_{COMPLETE,UNNECESSARY} Davide Caratti
2017-04-07 14:16 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 19:50 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 19:50 ` Tom Herbert
2017-02-28 10:32 ` [PATCH RFC net-next v2 4/4] Documentation: update notes on checksum offloading Davide Caratti
2017-02-28 10:32 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/5] net: introduce skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 4/5] net: more accurate checksumming in validate_xmit_skb Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 5/5] Documentation: add description of skb_sctp_csum_help Davide Caratti
2017-01-23 16:52 ` Davide Caratti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1491562390.git.dcaratti@redhat.com \
--to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.