All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V2 00/10] cpufreq: Migrate users of policy notifiers to QoS requests
@ 2019-07-23  6:14 ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2019-07-23  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafael Wysocki, Amit Daniel Kachhap, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Daniel Lezcano, Eduardo Valentin,
	Erik Schmauss, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Javi Merino, Jonathan Corbet,
	Len Brown, Rafael J. Wysocki, Robert Moore, Viresh Kumar,
	Zhang Rui
  Cc: linux-pm, Vincent Guittot, devel, dri-devel, linux-acpi,
	linux-doc, linux-fbdev, linux-kernel, linuxppc-dev

Hello,

Now that cpufreq core supports taking QoS requests for min/max cpu
frequencies, lets migrate rest of the users to using them instead of the
policy notifiers.

The CPUFREQ_NOTIFY and CPUFREQ_ADJUST events of the policy notifiers are
removed as a result, but we have to add CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY and
CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY events to it for the acpi stuff specifically,
though they are also used by arch_topology stuff now. So the policy
notifiers aren't completely removed.

Boot tested on my x86 PC and ARM hikey board.

This has already gone through build bot for a few days now.

V1->V2:
- Added Acked-by tags
- Reordered to keep cleanups at the bottom
- Rebased over 5.3-rc1

--
viresh

Viresh Kumar (10):
  cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers
  thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq
    notifier
  powerpc: macintosh: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier
  cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq
    notifier
  ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier
  arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY
  video: sa1100fb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier
  video: pxafb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier
  cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier
    events
  Documentation: cpufreq: Update policy notifier documentation

 Documentation/cpu-freq/core.txt            |  16 +--
 drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c            |  44 ++++++++-
 drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c           | 106 +++++++++-----------
 drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c           |  81 ++++++++-------
 drivers/base/arch_topology.c               |   2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c                  |  51 ++++------
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c          |  19 +++-
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq.h          |   8 ++
 drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c      |  96 +++++++++++-------
 drivers/macintosh/windfarm_cpufreq_clamp.c |  77 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c              | 110 +++++----------------
 drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.c                |  21 ----
 drivers/video/fbdev/pxafb.h                |   1 -
 drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.c             |  27 -----
 drivers/video/fbdev/sa1100fb.h             |   1 -
 include/acpi/processor.h                   |  22 +++--
 include/linux/cpufreq.h                    |   4 +-
 17 files changed, 327 insertions(+), 359 deletions(-)

-- 
2.21.0.rc0.269.g1a574e7a288b


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Devel] [PATCH V2 05/10] ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier
  2019-08-09  2:33           ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2019-08-10 12:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2019-08-10 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 16662 bytes --]

On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 4:33 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 06-08-19, 14:17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 06-08-19, 10:01, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Yes, it does, thanks!
> > >
> > > [No need to resend, I'll take it from this message.]
> >
> > Forgot to write CPU in caps in print messages, updated now.
>
> And here is another version.

Queuing up for v5.4, thanks!

>
> -------------------------8<-------------------------
> From 6d2c1e8034562043a758524d6078e2dd1624195c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> Message-Id: <6d2c1e8034562043a758524d6078e2dd1624195c.1565317925.git.viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org>
> From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org>
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:06:02 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq
>  notifier
>
> The cpufreq core now takes the min/max frequency constraints via QoS
> requests and the CPUFREQ_ADJUST notifier shall get removed later on.
>
> Switch over to using the QoS request for maximum frequency constraint
> for acpi driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar(a)linaro.org>
> ---
> - dev_pm_qos_update_request() can return 1 on success
>
>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c  | 37 ++++++++++--
>  drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 96 +++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 81 +++++++++++++--------------
>  include/acpi/processor.h         | 21 ++++---
>  4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> index aea8d674a33d..2c911fcaa4b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
> @@ -284,6 +284,29 @@ static int acpi_processor_stop(struct device *dev)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +bool acpi_processor_cpufreq_init;
> +
> +static int acpi_processor_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> +                                  unsigned long event, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> +       int cpu = policy->cpu;
> +
> +       if (event == CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY) {
> +               acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(cpu);
> +               acpi_processor_ppc_init(cpu);
> +       } else if (event == CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY) {
> +               acpi_processor_ppc_exit(cpu);
> +               acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(cpu);
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block acpi_processor_notifier_block = {
> +       .notifier_call = acpi_processor_notifier,
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * We keep the driver loaded even when ACPI is not running.
>   * This is needed for the powernow-k8 driver, that works even without
> @@ -310,8 +333,10 @@ static int __init acpi_processor_driver_init(void)
>         cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ACPI_CPUDRV_DEAD, "acpi/cpu-drv:dead",
>                                   NULL, acpi_soft_cpu_dead);
>
> -       acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init();
> -       acpi_processor_ppc_init();
> +       if (!cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_processor_notifier_block,
> +                                      CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER))
> +               acpi_processor_cpufreq_init = true;
> +
>         acpi_processor_throttling_init();
>         return 0;
>  err:
> @@ -324,8 +349,12 @@ static void __exit acpi_processor_driver_exit(void)
>         if (acpi_disabled)
>                 return;
>
> -       acpi_processor_ppc_exit();
> -       acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit();
> +       if (acpi_processor_cpufreq_init) {
> +               cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&acpi_processor_notifier_block,
> +                                           CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> +               acpi_processor_cpufreq_init = false;
> +       }
> +
>         cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(hp_online);
>         cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ACPI_CPUDRV_DEAD);
>         driver_unregister(&acpi_processor_driver);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> index ee87cb6f6e59..277fcbbe3be4 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
> @@ -50,57 +50,13 @@ module_param(ignore_ppc, int, 0644);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(ignore_ppc, "If the frequency of your machine gets wrongly" \
>                  "limited by BIOS, this should help");
>
> -#define PPC_REGISTERED   1
> -#define PPC_IN_USE       2
> -
> -static int acpi_processor_ppc_status;
> -
> -static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -                                      unsigned long event, void *data)
> -{
> -       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> -       struct acpi_processor *pr;
> -       unsigned int ppc = 0;
> -
> -       if (ignore_ppc < 0)
> -               ignore_ppc = 0;
> -
> -       if (ignore_ppc)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
> -               return 0;
> -
> -       mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
> -
> -       pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
> -       if (!pr || !pr->performance)
> -               goto out;
> -
> -       ppc = (unsigned int)pr->performance_platform_limit;
> -
> -       if (ppc >= pr->performance->state_count)
> -               goto out;
> -
> -       cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0,
> -                                    pr->performance->states[ppc].
> -                                    core_frequency * 1000);
> -
> -      out:
> -       mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
> -
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block acpi_ppc_notifier_block = {
> -       .notifier_call = acpi_processor_ppc_notifier,
> -};
> +static bool acpi_processor_ppc_in_use;
>
>  static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  {
>         acpi_status status = 0;
>         unsigned long long ppc = 0;
> -
> +       int ret;
>
>         if (!pr)
>                 return -EINVAL;
> @@ -112,7 +68,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>         status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_PPC", NULL, &ppc);
>
>         if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> -               acpi_processor_ppc_status |= PPC_IN_USE;
> +               acpi_processor_ppc_in_use = true;
>
>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) && status != AE_NOT_FOUND) {
>                 ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PPC"));
> @@ -124,6 +80,16 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>
>         pr->performance_platform_limit = (int)ppc;
>
> +       if (ignore_ppc || ppc >= pr->performance->state_count)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&pr->perflib_req,
> +                       pr->performance->states[ppc].core_frequency * 1000);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               pr_warn("Failed to update perflib freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n",
> +                       pr->id, ret);
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -184,23 +150,29 @@ int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_processor_get_bios_limit);
>
> -void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void)
> +void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu)
>  {
> -       if (!cpufreq_register_notifier
> -           (&acpi_ppc_notifier_block, CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER))
> -               acpi_processor_ppc_status |= PPC_REGISTERED;
> -       else
> -               printk(KERN_DEBUG
> -                      "Warning: Processor Platform Limit not supported.\n");
> +       struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(cpu),
> +                                    &pr->perflib_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY,
> +                                    INT_MAX);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu,
> +                      ret);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (ignore_ppc < 0)
> +               ignore_ppc = 0;
>  }
>
> -void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void)
> +void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu)
>  {
> -       if (acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED)
> -               cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&acpi_ppc_notifier_block,
> -                                           CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> +       struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
>
> -       acpi_processor_ppc_status &= ~PPC_REGISTERED;
> +       dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req);
>  }
>
>  static int acpi_processor_get_performance_control(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> @@ -477,7 +449,7 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
>         static int is_done = 0;
>         int result;
>
> -       if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
> +       if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init)
>                 return -EBUSY;
>
>         if (!try_module_get(calling_module))
> @@ -513,7 +485,7 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module)
>          * we can allow the cpufreq driver to be rmmod'ed. */
>         is_done = 1;
>
> -       if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_IN_USE))
> +       if (!acpi_processor_ppc_in_use)
>                 module_put(calling_module);
>
>         return 0;
> @@ -742,7 +714,7 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
>  {
>         struct acpi_processor *pr;
>
> -       if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
> +       if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> index 50fb0107375e..eb552ee086ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
> @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ ACPI_MODULE_NAME("processor_thermal");
>  #define CPUFREQ_THERMAL_MAX_STEP 3
>
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg);
> -static unsigned int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0;
>
>  #define reduction_pctg(cpu) \
>         per_cpu(cpufreq_thermal_reduction_pctg, phys_package_first_cpu(cpu))
> @@ -61,35 +60,11 @@ static int phys_package_first_cpu(int cpu)
>  static int cpu_has_cpufreq(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         struct cpufreq_policy policy;
> -       if (!acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
> +       if (!acpi_processor_cpufreq_init || cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu))
>                 return 0;
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> -static int acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
> -                                        unsigned long event, void *data)
> -{
> -       struct cpufreq_policy *policy = data;
> -       unsigned long max_freq = 0;
> -
> -       if (event != CPUFREQ_ADJUST)
> -               goto out;
> -
> -       max_freq = (
> -           policy->cpuinfo.max_freq *
> -           (100 - reduction_pctg(policy->cpu) * 20)
> -       ) / 100;
> -
> -       cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, 0, max_freq);
> -
> -      out:
> -       return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct notifier_block acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block = {
> -       .notifier_call = acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier,
> -};
> -
>  static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
>         if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu))
> @@ -108,7 +83,10 @@ static int cpufreq_get_cur_state(unsigned int cpu)
>
>  static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state)
>  {
> -       int i;
> +       struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> +       struct acpi_processor *pr;
> +       unsigned long max_freq;
> +       int i, ret;
>
>         if (!cpu_has_cpufreq(cpu))
>                 return 0;
> @@ -121,33 +99,50 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigned int cpu, int state)
>          * frequency.
>          */
>         for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> -               if (topology_physical_package_id(i) ==
> +               if (topology_physical_package_id(i) !=
>                     topology_physical_package_id(cpu))
> -                       cpufreq_update_policy(i);
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               pr = per_cpu(processors, i);
> +
> +               policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(i);
> +               if (!policy)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               max_freq = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * (100 - reduction_pctg(i) * 20)) / 100;
> +
> +               cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> +
> +               ret = dev_pm_qos_update_request(&pr->thermal_req, max_freq);
> +               if (ret < 0) {
> +                       pr_warn("Failed to update thermal freq constraint: CPU%d (%d)\n",
> +                               pr->id, ret);
> +               }
>         }
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void)
> +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu)
>  {
> -       int i;
> -
> -       i = cpufreq_register_notifier(&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block,
> -                                     CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> -       if (!i)
> -               acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 1;
> +       struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = dev_pm_qos_add_request(get_cpu_device(cpu),
> +                                    &pr->thermal_req, DEV_PM_QOS_MAX_FREQUENCY,
> +                                    INT_MAX);
> +       if (ret < 0) {
> +               pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu,
> +                      ret);
> +               return;
> +       }
>  }
>
> -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void)
> +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu)
>  {
> -       if (acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init)
> -               cpufreq_unregister_notifier
> -                   (&acpi_thermal_cpufreq_notifier_block,
> -                    CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
> +       struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
>
> -       acpi_thermal_cpufreq_is_init = 0;
> +       dev_pm_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req);
>  }
> -
>  #else                          /* ! CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
>  static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index 1194a4c78d55..ea21a6d20da7 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
>  #include <linux/thermal.h>
>  #include <asm/acpi.h>
>
> @@ -230,6 +232,8 @@ struct acpi_processor {
>         struct acpi_processor_limit limit;
>         struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev;
>         struct device *dev; /* Processor device. */
> +       struct dev_pm_qos_request perflib_req;
> +       struct dev_pm_qos_request thermal_req;
>  };
>
>  struct acpi_processor_errata {
> @@ -296,16 +300,17 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter(struct acpi_processor_cx
>  /* in processor_perflib.c */
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
> -void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void);
> -void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void);
> +extern bool acpi_processor_cpufreq_init;
> +void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu);
> +void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu);
>  void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr, int event_flag);
>  extern int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit);
>  #else
> -static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(void)
> +static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_init(int cpu)
>  {
>         return;
>  }
> -static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void)
> +static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(int cpu)
>  {
>         return;
>  }
> @@ -421,14 +426,14 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_hotplug(struct acpi_processor *pr)
>  int acpi_processor_get_limit_info(struct acpi_processor *pr);
>  extern const struct thermal_cooling_device_ops processor_cooling_ops;
>  #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS) & defined(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ)
> -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void);
> -void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void);
> +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu);
> +void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu);
>  #else
> -static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(void)
> +static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(int cpu)
>  {
>         return;
>  }
> -static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(void)
> +static inline void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(int cpu)
>  {
>         return;
>  }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-28  8:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-07-23  6:14 [PATCH V2 00/10] cpufreq: Migrate users of policy notifiers to QoS requests Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:26 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 01/10] cpufreq: Add policy create/remove notifiers Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 02/10] thermal: cpu_cooling: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 03/10] powerpc: macintosh: " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 04/10] cpufreq: powerpc_cbe: " Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  2:34   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  9:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-19  2:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-19  6:42         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-19  6:47           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-10 12:19     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 05/10] ACPI: cpufreq: " Viresh Kumar
2019-08-05  9:42   ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05  9:42     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  4:39     ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-06  8:01       ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  8:01         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-06  8:47         ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-09  2:33           ` Viresh Kumar
2019-08-28  8:50   ` [PATCH V3 " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 06/10] arch_topology: Use CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY instead of CPUFREQ_NOTIFY Viresh Kumar
2019-07-25 13:36   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 07/10] video: sa1100fb: Remove cpufreq policy notifier Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:26   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 08/10] video: pxafb: " Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:26   ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 09/10] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY policy notifier events Viresh Kumar
2019-07-23  6:14 ` [PATCH V2 10/10] Documentation: cpufreq: Update policy notifier documentation Viresh Kumar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-10 12:13 [Devel] [PATCH V2 05/10] ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-10 12:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.