* [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 &&
@ 2023-02-08 21:44 Paolo Abeni
2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets Paolo Abeni
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mptcp; +Cc: Christoph Paasch
Sharing these very early, because I can't reproduce the issues locally.
Even the commit messages are early draft.
@Christoph could you please check the relevant repros here?
I *think* there still some refcount problem to address in the new code,
any sharp eyes more then welcome ;)
Targeting -net even if bases on top of corrent mptcp-next, as
the merge window is almost imminent.
Paolo Abeni (2):
mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets.
mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 27 ++++++++-----
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 91 +++++---------------------------------------
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
--
2.39.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets. 2023-02-08 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 21:44 ` Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 23:07 ` Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown Paolo Abeni ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Christoph Paasch Christoph reported a UaF while disposing unaccepted MPC subflow. We need to properly clean-up all the paired MPTCP-level resources and be sure to release the msk last, even when the unaccepted subflow is destroyed by the TCP internals via inet_child_forget(). We can re-use the existing MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW infra, explicitly checking that for the critical scenario: the closed subflow is the MPC one, the msk is not accepted and eventually going through full cleanup. With such change, __mptcp_destroy_sock() is always called on msk sockets, even on accepted ones. We don't need anymore to transiently drop one sk reference at msk clone time. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- net/mptcp/protocol.h | 3 ++- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 11 +++++++++-- 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index 546df81c162f..d7588535bf6d 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -2444,9 +2444,10 @@ static unsigned int mptcp_sync_mss(struct sock *sk, u32 pmtu) return 0; } -static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk) +static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct sock *sk) { struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp; + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); might_sleep(); @@ -2460,7 +2461,15 @@ static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk) if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&ssk->sk_receive_queue)) continue; - mptcp_close_ssk((struct sock *)msk, ssk, subflow); + mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow); + } + + /* if the MPC subflow has been closed before the msk is accepted, + * msk will never be accept-ed, close it now + */ + if (!msk->first && msk->in_accept_queue) { + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD); + sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE; } } @@ -2684,6 +2693,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk); mptcp_check_data_fin(sk); + if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) + __mptcp_close_subflow(sk); + /* There is no point in keeping around an orphaned sk timedout or * closed, but we need the msk around to reply to incoming DATA_FIN, * even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state @@ -2699,9 +2711,6 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) } } - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) - __mptcp_close_subflow(msk); - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags)) __mptcp_retrans(sk); @@ -3149,6 +3158,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, msk->local_key = subflow_req->local_key; msk->token = subflow_req->token; msk->subflow = NULL; + msk->in_accept_queue = 1; WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, false); if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD) WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, true); @@ -3169,8 +3179,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, security_inet_csk_clone(nsk, req); bh_unlock_sock(nsk); - /* keep a single reference */ - __sock_put(nsk); + /* note: the newly allocated socket refcount is 2 now */ return nsk; } @@ -3226,8 +3235,6 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, goto out; } - /* acquire the 2nd reference for the owning socket */ - sock_hold(new_mptcp_sock); newsk = new_mptcp_sock; MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK); } else { @@ -3781,6 +3788,7 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags); + msk->in_accept_queue = 0; /* set ssk->sk_socket of accept()ed flows to mptcp socket. * This is needed so NOSPACE flag can be set from tcp stack. diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h index 3a055438c65e..252f050c96c6 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock { u8 recvmsg_inq:1, cork:1, nodelay:1, - fastopening:1; + fastopening:1, + in_accept_queue:1; int connect_flags; struct work_struct work; struct sk_buff *ooo_last_skb; diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index f075607adad4..1dff2ea6d6d3 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -693,9 +693,10 @@ static bool subflow_hmac_valid(const struct request_sock *req, static void mptcp_force_close(struct sock *sk) { - /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space */ + /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space, and refcount is 2 */ inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); sk_common_release(sk); + sock_put(sk); } static void subflow_ulp_fallback(struct sock *sk, @@ -1854,7 +1855,6 @@ void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_sk, struct sock *listener_s struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; bool do_cancel_work; - sock_hold(sk); lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); next = msk->dl_next; msk->dl_next = NULL; @@ -1949,6 +1949,13 @@ static void subflow_ulp_release(struct sock *ssk) * the ctx alive, will be freed by __mptcp_close_ssk() */ release = ctx->disposable; + + /* inet_child_forget() does not call sk_state_change(), + * explicitly trigger the socket close machinery + */ + if (!release && !test_and_set_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, + &mptcp_sk(sk)->flags)) + schedule_work(&mptcp_sk(sk)->work); sock_put(sk); } -- 2.39.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets. 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 23:07 ` Paolo Abeni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Christoph Paasch On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 22:44 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote: > Christoph reported a UaF while disposing unaccepted MPC > subflow. > > We need to properly clean-up all the paired MPTCP-level > resources and be sure to release the msk last, even when > the unaccepted subflow is destroyed by the TCP internals > via inet_child_forget(). > > We can re-use the existing MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW infra, > explicitly checking that for the critical scenario: the > closed subflow is the MPC one, the msk is not accepted and > eventually going through full cleanup. > > With such change, __mptcp_destroy_sock() is always called > on msk sockets, even on accepted ones. We don't need anymore > to transiently drop one sk reference at msk clone time. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> > --- > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++--------- > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 3 ++- > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > index 546df81c162f..d7588535bf6d 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c > @@ -2444,9 +2444,10 @@ static unsigned int mptcp_sync_mss(struct sock *sk, u32 pmtu) > return 0; > } > > -static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > +static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct sock *sk) > { > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow, *tmp; > + struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk); > > might_sleep(); > > @@ -2460,7 +2461,15 @@ static void __mptcp_close_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk) > if (!skb_queue_empty_lockless(&ssk->sk_receive_queue)) > continue; > > - mptcp_close_ssk((struct sock *)msk, ssk, subflow); > + mptcp_close_ssk(sk, ssk, subflow); > + } > + > + /* if the MPC subflow has been closed before the msk is accepted, > + * msk will never be accept-ed, close it now > + */ > + if (!msk->first && msk->in_accept_queue) { > + sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD); > + sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE; > } > } > > @@ -2684,6 +2693,9 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) > __mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk); > mptcp_check_data_fin(sk); > > + if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) > + __mptcp_close_subflow(sk); > + > /* There is no point in keeping around an orphaned sk timedout or > * closed, but we need the msk around to reply to incoming DATA_FIN, > * even if it is orphaned and in FIN_WAIT2 state > @@ -2699,9 +2711,6 @@ static void mptcp_worker(struct work_struct *work) > } > } > > - if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, &msk->flags)) > - __mptcp_close_subflow(msk); > - > if (test_and_clear_bit(MPTCP_WORK_RTX, &msk->flags)) > __mptcp_retrans(sk); > > @@ -3149,6 +3158,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, > msk->local_key = subflow_req->local_key; > msk->token = subflow_req->token; > msk->subflow = NULL; > + msk->in_accept_queue = 1; > WRITE_ONCE(msk->fully_established, false); > if (mp_opt->suboptions & OPTION_MPTCP_CSUMREQD) > WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, true); > @@ -3169,8 +3179,7 @@ struct sock *mptcp_sk_clone(const struct sock *sk, > security_inet_csk_clone(nsk, req); > bh_unlock_sock(nsk); > > - /* keep a single reference */ > - __sock_put(nsk); > + /* note: the newly allocated socket refcount is 2 now */ > return nsk; > } > > @@ -3226,8 +3235,6 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err, > goto out; > } > > - /* acquire the 2nd reference for the owning socket */ > - sock_hold(new_mptcp_sock); > newsk = new_mptcp_sock; > MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_MPCAPABLEPASSIVEACK); > } else { > @@ -3781,6 +3788,7 @@ static int mptcp_stream_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, > struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; > > set_bit(SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT, &newsock->flags); > + msk->in_accept_queue = 0; > > /* set ssk->sk_socket of accept()ed flows to mptcp socket. > * This is needed so NOSPACE flag can be set from tcp stack. > diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > index 3a055438c65e..252f050c96c6 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h > +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h > @@ -294,7 +294,8 @@ struct mptcp_sock { > u8 recvmsg_inq:1, > cork:1, > nodelay:1, > - fastopening:1; > + fastopening:1, > + in_accept_queue:1; > int connect_flags; > struct work_struct work; > struct sk_buff *ooo_last_skb; > diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > index f075607adad4..1dff2ea6d6d3 100644 > --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c > +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c > @@ -693,9 +693,10 @@ static bool subflow_hmac_valid(const struct request_sock *req, > > static void mptcp_force_close(struct sock *sk) > { > - /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space */ > + /* the msk is not yet exposed to user-space, and refcount is 2 */ > inet_sk_state_store(sk, TCP_CLOSE); > sk_common_release(sk); > + sock_put(sk); > } > > static void subflow_ulp_fallback(struct sock *sk, > @@ -1854,7 +1855,6 @@ void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_sk, struct sock *listener_s > struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; > bool do_cancel_work; > > - sock_hold(sk); > lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); > next = msk->dl_next; > msk->dl_next = NULL; > @@ -1949,6 +1949,13 @@ static void subflow_ulp_release(struct sock *ssk) > * the ctx alive, will be freed by __mptcp_close_ssk() > */ > release = ctx->disposable; > + > + /* inet_child_forget() does not call sk_state_change(), > + * explicitly trigger the socket close machinery > + */ > + if (!release && !test_and_set_bit(MPTCP_WORK_CLOSE_SUBFLOW, > + &mptcp_sk(sk)->flags)) > + schedule_work(&mptcp_sk(sk)->work); The above is buggy. Instead of schedule_work(&mptcp_sk(sk)->work); should be mptcp_schedule_work(sk); @Christoph: could you add the above editing while testing, or do you prefer I'll send a the full series edited? Thanks! Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown 2023-02-08 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 21:44 ` Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 23:09 ` mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown: Tests Results MPTCP CI 2023-02-09 18:57 ` MPTCP CI 2023-02-09 4:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Christoph Paasch 2023-02-09 16:56 ` Christoph Paasch 3 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mptcp; +Cc: Christoph Paasch After the previous patch we don't need anymore special-casing msk listener socket cleanup: the mptcp worker will process each of the unaccepted msk sockets. Just drop the now unnecessary code. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> --- net/mptcp/protocol.c | 1 - net/mptcp/protocol.h | 1 - net/mptcp/subflow.c | 80 -------------------------------------------- 3 files changed, 82 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c index d7588535bf6d..ae2d715f82b5 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c @@ -2400,7 +2400,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, /* otherwise tcp will dispose of the ssk and subflow ctx */ if (ssk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { tcp_set_state(ssk, TCP_CLOSE); - mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(sk, ssk); inet_csk_listen_stop(ssk); mptcp_event_pm_listener(ssk, MPTCP_EVENT_LISTENER_CLOSED); } diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h index 252f050c96c6..ba4d22ffd228 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h @@ -631,7 +631,6 @@ void mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow); void __mptcp_subflow_send_ack(struct sock *ssk); void mptcp_subflow_reset(struct sock *ssk); -void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk); void mptcp_sock_graft(struct sock *sk, struct socket *parent); struct socket *__mptcp_nmpc_socket(struct mptcp_sock *msk); bool __mptcp_close(struct sock *sk, long timeout); diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index 1dff2ea6d6d3..4f397d336811 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c @@ -1814,86 +1814,6 @@ static void subflow_state_change(struct sock *sk) } } -void mptcp_subflow_queue_clean(struct sock *listener_sk, struct sock *listener_ssk) -{ - struct request_sock_queue *queue = &inet_csk(listener_ssk)->icsk_accept_queue; - struct mptcp_sock *msk, *next, *head = NULL; - struct request_sock *req; - - /* build a list of all unaccepted mptcp sockets */ - spin_lock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); - for (req = queue->rskq_accept_head; req; req = req->dl_next) { - struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow; - struct sock *ssk = req->sk; - struct mptcp_sock *msk; - - if (!sk_is_mptcp(ssk)) - continue; - - subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk); - if (!subflow || !subflow->conn) - continue; - - /* skip if already in list */ - msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn); - if (msk->dl_next || msk == head) - continue; - - msk->dl_next = head; - head = msk; - } - spin_unlock_bh(&queue->rskq_lock); - if (!head) - return; - - /* can't acquire the msk socket lock under the subflow one, - * or will cause ABBA deadlock - */ - release_sock(listener_ssk); - - for (msk = head; msk; msk = next) { - struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; - bool do_cancel_work; - - lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - next = msk->dl_next; - msk->dl_next = NULL; - - /* The upcoming mptcp_close is going to drop all the references - * to the first subflow, ignoring that one of such reference is - * owned by the request socket still in the accept queue and that - * later inet_csk_listen_stop will drop it. - * Acquire an extra reference here to avoid an UaF at that point. - */ - if (msk->first) - sock_hold(msk->first); - - do_cancel_work = __mptcp_close(sk, -1); - release_sock(sk); - if (do_cancel_work) { - /* lockdep will report a false positive ABBA deadlock - * between cancel_work_sync and the listener socket. - * The involved locks belong to different sockets WRT - * the existing AB chain. - * Using a per socket key is problematic as key - * deregistration requires process context and must be - * performed at socket disposal time, in atomic - * context. - * Just tell lockdep to consider the listener socket - * released here. - */ - mutex_release(&listener_sk->sk_lock.dep_map, _RET_IP_); - mptcp_cancel_work(sk); - mutex_acquire(&listener_sk->sk_lock.dep_map, - SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, 0, _RET_IP_); - } - sock_put(sk); - } - - /* we are still under the listener msk socket lock */ - lock_sock_nested(listener_ssk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); -} - static int subflow_ulp_init(struct sock *sk) { struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(sk); -- 2.39.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown: Tests Results 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-08 23:09 ` MPTCP CI 2023-02-09 18:57 ` MPTCP CI 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: MPTCP CI @ 2023-02-08 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp Hi Paolo, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): - Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) ❌: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/4517118641700864 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/4517118641700864/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): - Unstable: 1 failed test(s): packetdrill_sockopts - Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) ❌: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5080068595122176 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5080068595122176/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): - Success! ✅: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6205968501964800 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6205968501964800/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): - Success! ✅: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5643018548543488 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5643018548543488/summary/summary.txt Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/ae7c0cbcdb5b If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-debug For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown: Tests Results 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 23:09 ` mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown: Tests Results MPTCP CI @ 2023-02-09 18:57 ` MPTCP CI 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: MPTCP CI @ 2023-02-09 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp Hi Paolo, Thank you for your modifications, that's great! Our CI did some validations and here is its report: - KVM Validation: normal (except selftest_mptcp_join): - Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) ❌: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5329004899598336 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5329004899598336/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: debug (except selftest_mptcp_join): - Critical: 1 Call Trace(s) ❌: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5047529922887680 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5047529922887680/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: normal (only selftest_mptcp_join): - Success! ✅: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6454904806440960 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6454904806440960/summary/summary.txt - KVM Validation: debug (only selftest_mptcp_join): - Success! ✅: - Task: https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6173429829730304 - Summary: https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/6173429829730304/summary/summary.txt Initiator: Patchew Applier Commits: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/commits/cbc3e5c367d4 If there are some issues, you can reproduce them using the same environment as the one used by the CI thanks to a docker image, e.g.: $ cd [kernel source code] $ docker run -v "${PWD}:${PWD}:rw" -w "${PWD}" --privileged --rm -it \ --pull always mptcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker:latest \ auto-debug For more details: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp-upstream-virtme-docker Please note that despite all the efforts that have been already done to have a stable tests suite when executed on a public CI like here, it is possible some reported issues are not due to your modifications. Still, do not hesitate to help us improve that ;-) Cheers, MPTCP GH Action bot Bot operated by Matthieu Baerts (Tessares) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && 2023-02-08 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown Paolo Abeni @ 2023-02-09 4:54 ` Christoph Paasch 2023-02-09 16:56 ` Christoph Paasch 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Christoph Paasch @ 2023-02-09 4:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp > On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote: > > Sharing these very early, because I can't reproduce the issues locally. > Even the commit messages are early draft. Turns out I can’t repro either (neither with the syzkaller-repro nor with the c-repro). All I have is the syzkaller report… I will update my syzkaller kernel and also apply Kuniyuki’s patch and run syzkaller again. Christoph > > @Christoph could you please check the relevant repros here? > > I *think* there still some refcount problem to address in the new code, > any sharp eyes more then welcome ;) > > Targeting -net even if bases on top of corrent mptcp-next, as > the merge window is almost imminent. > > Paolo Abeni (2): > mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets. > mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown > > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 27 ++++++++----- > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +- > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 91 +++++--------------------------------------- > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.39.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && 2023-02-08 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Paolo Abeni ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2023-02-09 4:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Christoph Paasch @ 2023-02-09 16:56 ` Christoph Paasch 3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Christoph Paasch @ 2023-02-09 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp > On Feb 8, 2023, at 1:44 PM, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote: > > Sharing these very early, because I can't reproduce the issues locally. > Even the commit messages are early draft. > > @Christoph could you please check the relevant repros here? > > I *think* there still some refcount problem to address in the new code, > any sharp eyes more then welcome ;) > > Targeting -net even if bases on top of corrent mptcp-next, as > the merge window is almost imminent. > > Paolo Abeni (2): > mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets. > mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown > > net/mptcp/protocol.c | 27 ++++++++----- > net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 +- > net/mptcp/subflow.c | 91 +++++--------------------------------------- > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-) I was able to get a new reproducer for a UaF read in subflow_error_report. Your patches (with the schedule-work fix) indeed fix the KASAN-issue. Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Christoph ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-09 18:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-02-08 21:44 [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 1/2] mptcp: use the workqueue to destroy unaccepted sockets Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 23:07 ` Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 21:44 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 2/2] mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown Paolo Abeni 2023-02-08 23:09 ` mptcp: fix UaF in listener shutdown: Tests Results MPTCP CI 2023-02-09 18:57 ` MPTCP CI 2023-02-09 4:54 ` [PATCH mptcp-net 0/2] mptcp: tentative fix for issues246 && Christoph Paasch 2023-02-09 16:56 ` Christoph Paasch
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.