From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, jialong.yang@shingroup.cn
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Clean up common uncore boilerplate
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1710257512.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Since this came up yet again recently, and it's an idea which has been
nagging me for years, I decided it was time to see how hard it really
would be to start shaving this yak. And it turns out to be refreshingly
simple - the core code has quietly become capable of doing most of what
we want, the one new functional addition is trivial (patch #2), and the
resulting largely-mechanical cleanup seems a pretty nice win.
This series is focused on drivers/perf/ as that's where most mess is
concentrated, but figured I'd include the arch/ patches as well since
they might be reasonable to land with the core changes, at least for x86
(FWIW I did also look at the powerpc drivers but they scared me and I
ran away; sorry). The remaining stragglers elsewhere around the tree I'd
come back to as a follow-up.
(And yes, I appreciate it's mid-merge-window already, but since I do
have a tree-wide rename proposed here, may as well give the discussion
a chance for a head start before -rc1...)
Thanks,
Robin.
Robin Murphy (10):
perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Use correct CPU affinity
perf: Add capability for common event support
drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_COMMON_EVENTS
perf: Rename PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT
drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SAMPLING consistently
drivers/perf: Clean up redundant per-task checks
perf: Define common uncore capabilities
drivers/perf: Use common uncore capabilities
x86: Use common uncore PMU capabilities
ARM: Use common uncore PMU capabilities
arch/arc/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c | 16 +-------------
arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c | 12 +---------
arch/csky/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 +-
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c | 17 +-------------
arch/x86/events/amd/power.c | 10 +--------
arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c | 12 +++-------
arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c | 16 +++-----------
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 11 +--------
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c | 20 +++--------------
arch/x86/events/msr.c | 9 +-------
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 9 +-------
drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c | 27 +++--------------------
drivers/perf/amlogic/meson_ddr_pmu_core.c | 11 +--------
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 20 +----------------
drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 10 +--------
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 27 ++---------------------
drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c | 18 +--------------
drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c | 22 +-----------------
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 7 ++----
drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 8 +------
drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 10 +--------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 20 +----------------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hns3_pmu.c | 9 +-------
drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 6 +----
drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 21 ++----------------
drivers/perf/qcom_l3_pmu.c | 21 +-----------------
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c | 17 +-------------
drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c | 16 +-------------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ++++-
kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++++-
47 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 456 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, jialong.yang@shingroup.cn
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] perf: Clean up common uncore boilerplate
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 17:34:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1710257512.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Since this came up yet again recently, and it's an idea which has been
nagging me for years, I decided it was time to see how hard it really
would be to start shaving this yak. And it turns out to be refreshingly
simple - the core code has quietly become capable of doing most of what
we want, the one new functional addition is trivial (patch #2), and the
resulting largely-mechanical cleanup seems a pretty nice win.
This series is focused on drivers/perf/ as that's where most mess is
concentrated, but figured I'd include the arch/ patches as well since
they might be reasonable to land with the core changes, at least for x86
(FWIW I did also look at the powerpc drivers but they scared me and I
ran away; sorry). The remaining stragglers elsewhere around the tree I'd
come back to as a follow-up.
(And yes, I appreciate it's mid-merge-window already, but since I do
have a tree-wide rename proposed here, may as well give the discussion
a chance for a head start before -rc1...)
Thanks,
Robin.
Robin Murphy (10):
perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Use correct CPU affinity
perf: Add capability for common event support
drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_COMMON_EVENTS
perf: Rename PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT
drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SAMPLING consistently
drivers/perf: Clean up redundant per-task checks
perf: Define common uncore capabilities
drivers/perf: Use common uncore capabilities
x86: Use common uncore PMU capabilities
ARM: Use common uncore PMU capabilities
arch/arc/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mmdc.c | 16 +-------------
arch/arm/mm/cache-l2x0-pmu.c | 12 +---------
arch/csky/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/8xx-pmu.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-24x7.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 2 +-
arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf.c | 2 +-
arch/sh/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/amd/iommu.c | 17 +-------------
arch/x86/events/amd/power.c | 10 +--------
arch/x86/events/amd/uncore.c | 12 +++-------
arch/x86/events/core.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c | 16 +++-----------
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 11 +--------
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snb.c | 20 +++--------------
arch/x86/events/msr.c | 9 +-------
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 9 +-------
drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/alibaba_uncore_drw_pmu.c | 27 +++--------------------
drivers/perf/amlogic/meson_ddr_pmu_core.c | 11 +--------
drivers/perf/arm-cci.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c | 20 +----------------
drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 10 +--------
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 27 ++---------------------
drivers/perf/arm_dmc620_pmu.c | 18 +--------------
drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c | 22 +-----------------
drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/arm_smmuv3_pmu.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/arm_spe_pmu.c | 7 ++----
drivers/perf/cxl_pmu.c | 8 +------
drivers/perf/dwc_pcie_pmu.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/fsl_imx8_ddr_perf.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 13 +----------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_pcie_pmu.c | 10 +--------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 20 +----------------
drivers/perf/hisilicon/hns3_pmu.c | 9 +-------
drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_ddr_pmu.c | 15 +------------
drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 6 +----
drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 21 ++----------------
drivers/perf/qcom_l3_pmu.c | 21 +-----------------
drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/thunderx2_pmu.c | 17 +-------------
drivers/perf/xgene_pmu.c | 16 +-------------
include/linux/perf_event.h | 6 ++++-
kernel/events/core.c | 7 +++++-
47 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 456 deletions(-)
--
2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 17:34 Robin Murphy [this message]
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 00/10] perf: Clean up common uncore boilerplate Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf/alibaba_uncore_drw: Use correct CPU affinity Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf: Add capability for common event support Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-14 8:09 ` Yang Jialong 杨佳龙
2024-03-14 8:09 ` Yang Jialong 杨佳龙
2024-03-14 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-14 12:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 03/10] drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_COMMON_EVENTS Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf: Rename PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_INTERRUPT Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-13 12:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-13 12:05 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-13 15:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-13 15:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 05/10] drivers/perf: Use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SAMPLING consistently Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-13 11:11 ` James Clark
2024-03-13 11:11 ` James Clark
2024-03-13 12:02 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-13 12:02 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 06/10] drivers/perf: Clean up redundant per-task checks Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf: Define common uncore capabilities Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-13 11:23 ` James Clark
2024-03-13 11:23 ` James Clark
2024-03-13 12:24 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-13 12:24 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 08/10] drivers/perf: Use " Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: Use common uncore PMU capabilities Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` [PATCH 10/10] ARM: " Robin Murphy
2024-03-12 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2024-03-30 14:59 ` Shawn Guo
2024-03-30 14:59 ` Shawn Guo
2024-03-13 11:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] perf: Clean up common uncore boilerplate James Clark
2024-03-13 11:26 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1710257512.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jialong.yang@shingroup.cn \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.