From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 06:32:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1726633812.git.ps@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1726578382.git.ps@pks.im>
Hi,
this is the second patch series that makes graceful concurrent writes
work with the reftable backend.
There is only a single change compared to v1, namely a fix to the docs
to mention the right default timeout value.
Thanks!
Patrick
Patrick Steinhardt (3):
refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout"
reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks
refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction
Documentation/config/reftable.txt | 7 ++++
refs/reftable-backend.c | 9 ++++-
reftable/reftable-stack.h | 13 +++++-
reftable/reftable-writer.h | 8 ++++
reftable/stack.c | 38 ++++++++++++------
t/t0610-reftable-basics.sh | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/unit-tests/t-reftable-stack.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
7 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Range-diff against v1:
1: ca3eab99f7e ! 1: 700a35df125 refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout"
@@ Documentation/config/reftable.txt: reftable.geometricFactor::
+ Whenever the reftable backend appends a new table to the stack, it has
+ to lock the central "tables.list" file before updating it. This config
+ controls how long the process will wait to acquire the lock in case
-+ another process has already acquired it. Default is 1000 (i.e., retry
-+ for 1 second).
++ another process has already acquired it. Default is 100 (i.e., retry
++ for 100ms).
## refs/reftable-backend.c ##
@@ refs/reftable-backend.c: static int reftable_be_config(const char *var, const char *value,
2: cd65e6d57b0 = 2: f4be0966e17 reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks
3: 37ec3acbff0 = 3: 111b497ef17 refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction
--
2.46.0.551.gc5ee8f2d1c.dirty
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-18 4:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-17 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 17:46 ` karthik nayak
2024-09-17 17:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes karthik nayak
2024-09-18 4:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:22 ` James Liu
2024-09-18 9:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:26 ` James Liu
2024-09-18 9:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-19 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-20 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-24 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 9:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-18 23:23 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] reftable: graceful concurrent writes James Liu
2024-09-24 5:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:32 ` [PATCH v4 " Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] refs/reftable: introduce "reftable.lockTimeout" Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] reftable/stack: allow locking of outdated stacks Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-24 5:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] refs/reftable: reload locked stack when preparing transaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-27 4:07 ` Jeff King
2024-09-30 6:49 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-30 22:19 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01 4:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01 22:54 ` Jeff King
2024-10-01 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-10-02 10:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-10-01 7:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-10-01 18:53 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-10-01 19:08 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1726633812.git.ps@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.