* [PATCH v2 01/10] can: rcar_canfd: Consistently use ndev for net_device pointers
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug prints Geert Uytterhoeven
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Most net_device pointers are named "ndev", but some are called "dev".
Increase uniformity by always using "ndev".
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 7f10213738e5cee7..2174c9667cabce54 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1436,9 +1436,9 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_canfd_channel_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
+static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
{
- struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv = priv->gpriv;
const struct can_bittiming *bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
const struct can_bittiming *dbt = &priv->can.fd.data_bittiming;
@@ -1818,10 +1818,10 @@ static int rcar_canfd_do_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
}
}
-static int rcar_canfd_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
+static int rcar_canfd_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev,
struct can_berr_counter *bec)
{
- struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
u32 val, ch = priv->channel;
/* Peripheral clock is already enabled in probe */
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug prints
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] can: rcar_canfd: Consistently use ndev for net_device pointers Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-12 4:02 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable ndev to rcar_canfd_rx_pkt() Geert Uytterhoeven
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
There is no need to have debug code to print the bittiming values, as
the user can get all values through the netlink interface.
Suggested-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
v2:
- New.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 2174c9667cabce54..b353168f75f28565 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1458,8 +1458,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
RCANFD_NCFG_NSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
- netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "nrate: brp %u, sjw %u, tseg1 %u, tseg2 %u\n",
- brp, sjw, tseg1, tseg2);
/* Data bit timing settings */
brp = dbt->brp - 1;
@@ -1471,8 +1469,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_F_DCFG(gpriv, ch), cfg);
- netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "drate: brp %u, sjw %u, tseg1 %u, tseg2 %u\n",
- brp, sjw, tseg1, tseg2);
} else {
/* Classical CAN only mode */
if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
@@ -1488,9 +1484,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
}
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
- netdev_dbg(priv->ndev,
- "rate: brp %u, sjw %u, tseg1 %u, tseg2 %u\n",
- brp, sjw, tseg1, tseg2);
}
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug prints
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug prints Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-12 4:02 ` Vincent Mailhol
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Mailhol @ 2025-06-12 4:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Marc Kleine-Budde, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
On 12/06/2025 at 00:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to have debug code to print the bittiming values, as
> the user can get all values through the netlink interface.
>
> Suggested-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 03/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable ndev to rcar_canfd_rx_pkt()
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] can: rcar_canfd: Consistently use ndev for net_device pointers Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug prints Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable dev to rcar_canfd_reset_controller() Geert Uytterhoeven
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
rcar_canfd_rx_pkt() has many users of "priv->ndev". Introduce a
shorthand to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index b353168f75f28565..ddf3b91d3d2bba97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1684,7 +1684,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t rcar_canfd_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
static void rcar_canfd_rx_pkt(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv)
{
- struct net_device_stats *stats = &priv->ndev->stats;
+ struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
+ struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats;
struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv = priv->gpriv;
struct canfd_frame *cf;
struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -1700,14 +1701,13 @@ static void rcar_canfd_rx_pkt(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv)
if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) &&
sts & RCANFD_RFFDSTS_RFFDF)
- skb = alloc_canfd_skb(priv->ndev, &cf);
+ skb = alloc_canfd_skb(ndev, &cf);
else
- skb = alloc_can_skb(priv->ndev,
- (struct can_frame **)&cf);
+ skb = alloc_can_skb(ndev, (struct can_frame **)&cf);
} else {
id = rcar_canfd_read(priv->base, RCANFD_C_RFID(ridx));
dlc = rcar_canfd_read(priv->base, RCANFD_C_RFPTR(ridx));
- skb = alloc_can_skb(priv->ndev, (struct can_frame **)&cf);
+ skb = alloc_can_skb(ndev, (struct can_frame **)&cf);
}
if (!skb) {
@@ -1728,7 +1728,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_rx_pkt(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv)
if (sts & RCANFD_RFFDSTS_RFESI) {
cf->flags |= CANFD_ESI;
- netdev_dbg(priv->ndev, "ESI Error\n");
+ netdev_dbg(ndev, "ESI Error\n");
}
if (!(sts & RCANFD_RFFDSTS_RFFDF) && (id & RCANFD_RFID_RFRTR)) {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 04/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable dev to rcar_canfd_reset_controller()
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable ndev to rcar_canfd_rx_pkt() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] can: rcar_canfd: Simplify data access in rcar_canfd_{ge,pu}t_data() Geert Uytterhoeven
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
rcar_canfd_reset_controller() has many users of "pdev->dev". Introduce
a shorthand to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index ddf3b91d3d2bba97..3244584a6ee5d67b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
static int rcar_canfd_reset_controller(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
{
+ struct device *dev = &gpriv->pdev->dev;
u32 sts, ch;
int err;
@@ -850,7 +851,7 @@ static int rcar_canfd_reset_controller(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
err = readl_poll_timeout((gpriv->base + RCANFD_GSTS), sts,
!(sts & RCANFD_GSTS_GRAMINIT), 2, 500000);
if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&gpriv->pdev->dev, "global raminit failed\n");
+ dev_dbg(dev, "global raminit failed\n");
return err;
}
@@ -863,7 +864,7 @@ static int rcar_canfd_reset_controller(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
err = readl_poll_timeout((gpriv->base + RCANFD_GSTS), sts,
(sts & RCANFD_GSTS_GRSTSTS), 2, 500000);
if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&gpriv->pdev->dev, "global reset failed\n");
+ dev_dbg(dev, "global reset failed\n");
return err;
}
@@ -887,8 +888,7 @@ static int rcar_canfd_reset_controller(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
(sts & RCANFD_CSTS_CRSTSTS),
2, 500000);
if (err) {
- dev_dbg(&gpriv->pdev->dev,
- "channel %u reset failed\n", ch);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "channel %u reset failed\n", ch);
return err;
}
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 05/10] can: rcar_canfd: Simplify data access in rcar_canfd_{ge,pu}t_data()
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add helper variable dev to rcar_canfd_reset_controller() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers Geert Uytterhoeven
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Replace the repeated casts, pointer additions, and pointer dereferences
by array accesses to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 3244584a6ee5d67b..dded509793bb93ec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -781,23 +781,23 @@ static void rcar_canfd_update_bit(void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
static void rcar_canfd_get_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
struct canfd_frame *cf, u32 off)
{
+ u32 *data = (u32 *)cf->data;
u32 i, lwords;
lwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(cf->len, sizeof(u32));
for (i = 0; i < lwords; i++)
- *((u32 *)cf->data + i) =
- rcar_canfd_read(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32));
+ data[i] = rcar_canfd_read(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32));
}
static void rcar_canfd_put_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
struct canfd_frame *cf, u32 off)
{
+ const u32 *data = (u32 *)cf->data;
u32 i, lwords;
lwords = DIV_ROUND_UP(cf->len, sizeof(u32));
for (i = 0; i < lwords; i++)
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32),
- *((u32 *)cf->data + i));
+ rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32), data[i]);
}
static void rcar_canfd_tx_failure_cleanup(struct net_device *ndev)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] can: rcar_canfd: Simplify data access in rcar_canfd_{ge,pu}t_data() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-12 4:00 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc() Geert Uytterhoeven
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Reuse the existing Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register offset
member in the register configuration as the base offset for all related
channel-specific registers.
Rename the member and update the (incorrect) comment to reflect this.
Replace the function-like channel-specific register offset macros by
inline functions.
This fixes the offsets of all other (currently unused) channel-specific
registers on R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G3E, and allows us to replace
RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG() by the more generic rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg().
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Replace function-like macros by inline functions,
- s/addresses/offsets/.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index dded509793bb93ec..8baf8a928da757f2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -425,19 +425,10 @@
#define RCANFD_C_RPGACC(r) (0x1900 + (0x04 * (r)))
/* R-Car Gen4 Classical and CAN FD mode specific register map */
-#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG(m) (0x1404 + (0x20 * (m)))
-
#define RCANFD_GEN4_GAFL_OFFSET (0x1800)
/* CAN FD mode specific register map */
-/* RSCFDnCFDCmXXX -> RCANFD_F_XXX(m) */
-#define RCANFD_F_DCFG(gpriv, m) ((gpriv)->info->regs->f_dcfg + (0x20 * (m)))
-#define RCANFD_F_CFDCFG(m) (0x0504 + (0x20 * (m)))
-#define RCANFD_F_CFDCTR(m) (0x0508 + (0x20 * (m)))
-#define RCANFD_F_CFDSTS(m) (0x050c + (0x20 * (m)))
-#define RCANFD_F_CFDCRC(m) (0x0510 + (0x20 * (m)))
-
/* RSCFDnCFDGAFLXXXj offset */
#define RCANFD_F_GAFL_OFFSET (0x1000)
@@ -510,7 +501,7 @@ struct rcar_canfd_regs {
u16 cfcc; /* Common FIFO Configuration/Control Register */
u16 cfsts; /* Common FIFO Status Register */
u16 cfpctr; /* Common FIFO Pointer Control Register */
- u16 f_dcfg; /* Global FD Configuration Register */
+ u16 coffset; /* Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register */
u16 rfoffset; /* Receive FIFO buffer access ID register */
u16 cfoffset; /* Transmit/receive FIFO buffer access ID register */
};
@@ -641,7 +632,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_regs rcar_gen3_regs = {
.cfcc = 0x0118,
.cfsts = 0x0178,
.cfpctr = 0x01d8,
- .f_dcfg = 0x0500,
+ .coffset = 0x0500,
.rfoffset = 0x3000,
.cfoffset = 0x3400,
};
@@ -651,7 +642,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_regs rcar_gen4_regs = {
.cfcc = 0x0120,
.cfsts = 0x01e0,
.cfpctr = 0x0240,
- .f_dcfg = 0x1400,
+ .coffset = 0x1400,
.rfoffset = 0x6000,
.cfoffset = 0x6400,
};
@@ -800,6 +791,37 @@ static void rcar_canfd_put_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32), data[i]);
}
+/* RSCFDnCFDCmXXX -> rcar_canfd_f_xxx(gpriv, ch) */
+static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x00 + 0x20 * ch;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x04 + 0x20 * ch;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdctr(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x08 + 0x20 * ch;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdsts(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x0c + 0x20 * ch;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcrc(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x10 + 0x20 * ch;
+}
+
static void rcar_canfd_tx_failure_cleanup(struct net_device *ndev)
{
u32 i;
@@ -827,8 +849,8 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
for_each_set_bit(ch, &gpriv->channels_mask,
gpriv->info->max_channels)
- rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base, RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG(ch),
- val);
+ rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base,
+ rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), val);
} else {
if (gpriv->fdmode)
rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base, RCANFD_GRMCFG,
@@ -1468,7 +1490,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_F_DCFG(gpriv, ch), cfg);
+ rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
} else {
/* Classical CAN only mode */
if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-12 4:00 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-12 11:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Mailhol @ 2025-06-12 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Marc Kleine-Budde, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
On 12/06/2025 at 00:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Reuse the existing Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register offset
> member in the register configuration as the base offset for all related
> channel-specific registers.
> Rename the member and update the (incorrect) comment to reflect this.
> Replace the function-like channel-specific register offset macros by
> inline functions.
>
> This fixes the offsets of all other (currently unused) channel-specific
> registers on R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G3E, and allows us to replace
> RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG() by the more generic rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg().
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> - Replace function-like macros by inline functions,
Thanks!
> - s/addresses/offsets/.
> ---
> drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> index dded509793bb93ec..8baf8a928da757f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> @@ -425,19 +425,10 @@
> #define RCANFD_C_RPGACC(r) (0x1900 + (0x04 * (r)))
>
> /* R-Car Gen4 Classical and CAN FD mode specific register map */
> -#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG(m) (0x1404 + (0x20 * (m)))
> -
> #define RCANFD_GEN4_GAFL_OFFSET (0x1800)
>
> /* CAN FD mode specific register map */
>
> -/* RSCFDnCFDCmXXX -> RCANFD_F_XXX(m) */
> -#define RCANFD_F_DCFG(gpriv, m) ((gpriv)->info->regs->f_dcfg + (0x20 * (m)))
> -#define RCANFD_F_CFDCFG(m) (0x0504 + (0x20 * (m)))
> -#define RCANFD_F_CFDCTR(m) (0x0508 + (0x20 * (m)))
> -#define RCANFD_F_CFDSTS(m) (0x050c + (0x20 * (m)))
> -#define RCANFD_F_CFDCRC(m) (0x0510 + (0x20 * (m)))
> -
> /* RSCFDnCFDGAFLXXXj offset */
> #define RCANFD_F_GAFL_OFFSET (0x1000)
>
> @@ -510,7 +501,7 @@ struct rcar_canfd_regs {
> u16 cfcc; /* Common FIFO Configuration/Control Register */
> u16 cfsts; /* Common FIFO Status Register */
> u16 cfpctr; /* Common FIFO Pointer Control Register */
> - u16 f_dcfg; /* Global FD Configuration Register */
> + u16 coffset; /* Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register */
> u16 rfoffset; /* Receive FIFO buffer access ID register */
> u16 cfoffset; /* Transmit/receive FIFO buffer access ID register */
> };
> @@ -641,7 +632,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_regs rcar_gen3_regs = {
> .cfcc = 0x0118,
> .cfsts = 0x0178,
> .cfpctr = 0x01d8,
> - .f_dcfg = 0x0500,
> + .coffset = 0x0500,
> .rfoffset = 0x3000,
> .cfoffset = 0x3400,
> };
> @@ -651,7 +642,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_regs rcar_gen4_regs = {
> .cfcc = 0x0120,
> .cfsts = 0x01e0,
> .cfpctr = 0x0240,
> - .f_dcfg = 0x1400,
> + .coffset = 0x1400,
> .rfoffset = 0x6000,
> .cfoffset = 0x6400,
> };
> @@ -800,6 +791,37 @@ static void rcar_canfd_put_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
> rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32), data[i]);
> }
>
> +/* RSCFDnCFDCmXXX -> rcar_canfd_f_xxx(gpriv, ch) */
> +static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
> + unsigned int ch)
> +{
> + return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x00 + 0x20 * ch;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
> + unsigned int ch)
> +{
> + return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x04 + 0x20 * ch;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdctr(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
> + unsigned int ch)
> +{
> + return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x08 + 0x20 * ch;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdsts(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
> + unsigned int ch)
> +{
> + return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x0c + 0x20 * ch;
> +}
> +
> +static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcrc(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
> + unsigned int ch)
> +{
> + return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x10 + 0x20 * ch;
> +}
> +
> static void rcar_canfd_tx_failure_cleanup(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> u32 i;
> @@ -827,8 +849,8 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
>
> for_each_set_bit(ch, &gpriv->channels_mask,
> gpriv->info->max_channels)
> - rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base, RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG(ch),
> - val);
> + rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base,
> + rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), val);
> } else {
> if (gpriv->fdmode)
> rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base, RCANFD_GRMCFG,
> @@ -1468,7 +1490,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
> cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
> RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
>
> - rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_F_DCFG(gpriv, ch), cfg);
> + rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
> } else {
> /* Classical CAN only mode */
> if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
Thinking of your code, you are still using some magic numbers, e.g.
0x04 + 0x20 * ch
to access your registers. But at the end those magic numbers are just describing
a memory layout.
I think this can be describe as a C structure. This is what I have in mind:
--------------8<--------------
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 1e559c0ff038..487f40320c20 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -560,10 +560,21 @@ struct rcar_canfd_channel {
spinlock_t tx_lock; /* To protect tx path */
};
+struct rcar_canfd_f {
+ u32 dcfg;
+ u32 cfdcfg;
+ u32 cfdctr;
+ u32 cfdsts;
+ u32 cfdcrc;
+ u32 padding[3];
+};
+static_assert(sizeof(struct rcar_canfd_f) == 0x20);
+
/* Global priv data */
struct rcar_canfd_global {
struct rcar_canfd_channel *ch[RCANFD_NUM_CHANNELS];
void __iomem *base; /* Register base address */
+ struct rcar_canfd_f __iomem *cbase;
struct platform_device *pdev; /* Respective platform device */
struct clk *clkp; /* Peripheral clock */
struct clk *can_clk; /* fCAN clock */
@@ -803,6 +814,26 @@ static void rcar_canfd_update_bit(void __iomem *base, u32 reg,
rcar_canfd_update(mask, val, base + reg);
}
+static inline u32 rcar_canfd_read_reg(void __iomem *addr)
+{
+ return readl(addr);
+}
+
+static inline void rcar_canfd_write_reg(void __iomem *addr, u32 val)
+{
+ writel(val, addr);
+}
+
+static void rcar_canfd_set_bit_reg(void __iomem *addr, u32 val)
+{
+ rcar_canfd_update(val, val, addr);
+}
+
+static void rcar_canfd_update_bit_reg(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask, u32 val)
+{
+ rcar_canfd_update(mask, val, addr);
+}
+
static void rcar_canfd_get_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
struct canfd_frame *cf, u32 off)
{
@@ -825,37 +856,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_put_data(struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv,
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, off + i * sizeof(u32), data[i]);
}
-/* RSCFDnCFDCmXXX -> rcar_canfd_f_xxx(gpriv, ch) */
-static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
- unsigned int ch)
-{
- return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x00 + 0x20 * ch;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
- unsigned int ch)
-{
- return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x04 + 0x20 * ch;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdctr(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
- unsigned int ch)
-{
- return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x08 + 0x20 * ch;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdsts(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
- unsigned int ch)
-{
- return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x0c + 0x20 * ch;
-}
-
-static inline unsigned int rcar_canfd_f_cfdcrc(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
- unsigned int ch)
-{
- return gpriv->info->regs->coffset + 0x10 + 0x20 * ch;
-}
-
static void rcar_canfd_tx_failure_cleanup(struct net_device *ndev)
{
u32 i;
@@ -883,8 +883,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
for_each_set_bit(ch, &gpriv->channels_mask,
gpriv->info->max_channels)
- rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base,
- rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), val);
+ rcar_canfd_set_bit_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].cfdcfg, val);
} else {
if (gpriv->fdmode)
rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base, RCANFD_GRMCFG,
@@ -1533,7 +1532,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
+ rcar_canfd_write_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].dcfg, cfg);
/* Transceiver Delay Compensation */
if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO) {
@@ -1546,8 +1545,8 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
tdco = min(tdc->tdcv + tdc->tdco, tdc_const->tdco_max) - 1;
}
- rcar_canfd_update_bit(gpriv->base, rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), mask,
- tdcmode | FIELD_PREP(RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO, tdco));
+ rcar_canfd_update_bit_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].cfdcfg, mask,
+ tdcmode | FIELD_PREP(RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO, tdco));
}
static int rcar_canfd_start(struct net_device *ndev)
@@ -1861,7 +1860,7 @@ static int rcar_canfd_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
static unsigned int rcar_canfd_get_tdcr(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
unsigned int ch)
{
- u32 sts = rcar_canfd_read(gpriv->base, rcar_canfd_f_cfdsts(gpriv, ch));
+ u32 sts = rcar_canfd_read_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].cfdsts);
u32 tdcr = FIELD_GET(RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR, sts);
return tdcr & (gpriv->info->tdc_const->tdcv_max - 1);
@@ -2170,6 +2169,7 @@ static int rcar_canfd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto fail_dev;
}
gpriv->base = addr;
+ gpriv->cbase = gpriv->base + gpriv->info->regs->coffset;
/* Request IRQ that's common for both channels */
if (info->shared_global_irqs) {
-------------->8--------------
(this applies on top of the last patch of your series)
To be honnest, I am happy to accept your patch as it is now, but what
do you think of the above? I think that this approach works with your
other macro as well.
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers
2025-06-12 4:00 ` Vincent Mailhol
@ 2025-06-12 11:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-12 12:31 ` Vincent Mailhol
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-12 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent Mailhol
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Marc Kleine-Budde, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 06:00, Vincent Mailhol
<mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> On 12/06/2025 at 00:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Reuse the existing Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register offset
> > member in the register configuration as the base offset for all related
> > channel-specific registers.
> > Rename the member and update the (incorrect) comment to reflect this.
> > Replace the function-like channel-specific register offset macros by
> > inline functions.
> >
> > This fixes the offsets of all other (currently unused) channel-specific
> > registers on R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G3E, and allows us to replace
> > RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG() by the more generic rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add Reviewed-by.
> > - Replace function-like macros by inline functions,
>
> Thanks!
> Thinking of your code, you are still using some magic numbers, e.g.
>
> 0x04 + 0x20 * ch
>
> to access your registers. But at the end those magic numbers are just describing
> a memory layout.
>
> I think this can be describe as a C structure. This is what I have in mind:
>
> --------------8<--------------
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> index 1e559c0ff038..487f40320c20 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
> @@ -560,10 +560,21 @@ struct rcar_canfd_channel {
> spinlock_t tx_lock; /* To protect tx path */
> };
>
> +struct rcar_canfd_f {
> + u32 dcfg;
> + u32 cfdcfg;
> + u32 cfdctr;
> + u32 cfdsts;
> + u32 cfdcrc;
> + u32 padding[3];
> +};
> +static_assert(sizeof(struct rcar_canfd_f) == 0x20);
Is that really needed?
> @@ -883,8 +883,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
>
> for_each_set_bit(ch, &gpriv->channels_mask,
> gpriv->info->max_channels)
> - rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base,
> - rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), val);
> + rcar_canfd_set_bit_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].cfdcfg, val);
Nice!
> To be honnest, I am happy to accept your patch as it is now, but what
> do you think of the above? I think that this approach works with your
> other macro as well.
Please take this as-is, so we can move forward.
I will create a proper patch (with your Suggested-by) later,
I have more CAN-FD items on my TODO list...
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers
2025-06-12 11:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-12 12:31 ` Vincent Mailhol
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Mailhol @ 2025-06-12 12:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Marc Kleine-Budde, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
On 12/06/2025 at 20:33, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 at 06:00, Vincent Mailhol
> <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>> On 12/06/2025 at 00:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> Reuse the existing Channel Data Bitrate Configuration Register offset
>>> member in the register configuration as the base offset for all related
>>> channel-specific registers.
>>> Rename the member and update the (incorrect) comment to reflect this.
>>> Replace the function-like channel-specific register offset macros by
>>> inline functions.
>>>
>>> This fixes the offsets of all other (currently unused) channel-specific
>>> registers on R-Car Gen4 and RZ/G3E, and allows us to replace
>>> RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG() by the more generic rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>> Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>> - Add Reviewed-by.
>>> - Replace function-like macros by inline functions,
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>> Thinking of your code, you are still using some magic numbers, e.g.
>>
>> 0x04 + 0x20 * ch
>>
>> to access your registers. But at the end those magic numbers are just describing
>> a memory layout.
>>
>> I think this can be describe as a C structure. This is what I have in mind:
>>
>> --------------8<--------------
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
>> index 1e559c0ff038..487f40320c20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
>> @@ -560,10 +560,21 @@ struct rcar_canfd_channel {
>> spinlock_t tx_lock; /* To protect tx path */
>> };
>>
>> +struct rcar_canfd_f {
>> + u32 dcfg;
>> + u32 cfdcfg;
>> + u32 cfdctr;
>> + u32 cfdsts;
>> + u32 cfdcrc;
>> + u32 padding[3];
>> +};
>> +static_assert(sizeof(struct rcar_canfd_f) == 0x20);
>
> Is that really needed?
It is needed to counterbalance my lack of confidence on whether I am able to
count up to 8 :)
It is just for debug, you can remove. Similarly, feel free to adjust the names.
I just wanted to convey my idea, and a piece of code was easier than a long
paragraph for that.
>> @@ -883,8 +883,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_mode(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv)
>>
>> for_each_set_bit(ch, &gpriv->channels_mask,
>> gpriv->info->max_channels)
>> - rcar_canfd_set_bit(gpriv->base,
>> - rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), val);
>> + rcar_canfd_set_bit_reg(&gpriv->cbase[ch].cfdcfg, val);
I was wondering if there was some kind of helper function to do that? If not,
maybe adding a
io_set_bitl(void __iomem *addr, val);
and so on into linux/io.h could be a good idea?
> Nice!
>
>> To be honnest, I am happy to accept your patch as it is now, but what
>> do you think of the above? I think that this approach works with your
>> other macro as well.
>
> Please take this as-is, so we can move forward.
@Marc, review is done, the series is ready for pick-up.
> I will create a proper patch (with your Suggested-by) later,
> I have more CAN-FD items on my TODO list...
No problem, take your time! My only wish is to not see more complexity added the
the function-like macros. Any other refactor is just a bonus!
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc()
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] can: rcar_canfd: Repurpose f_dcfg base for other registers Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-12 4:04 ` Vincent Mailhol
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] can: rcar_canfd: Share config code in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming() Geert Uytterhoeven
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Insert an underscore in the function's name, for consistency with other
getter and setter helper functions.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
---
v2:
- New.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 8baf8a928da757f2..c292694ae4d27ac4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -830,8 +830,8 @@ static void rcar_canfd_tx_failure_cleanup(struct net_device *ndev)
can_free_echo_skb(ndev, i, NULL);
}
-static void rcar_canfd_setrnc(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, unsigned int ch,
- unsigned int num_rules)
+static void rcar_canfd_set_rnc(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, unsigned int ch,
+ unsigned int num_rules)
{
unsigned int rnc_stride = 32 / gpriv->info->rnc_field_width;
unsigned int shift = 32 - (ch % rnc_stride + 1) * gpriv->info->rnc_field_width;
@@ -960,7 +960,7 @@ static void rcar_canfd_configure_afl_rules(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
RCANFD_GAFLECTR_AFLDAE));
/* Write number of rules for channel */
- rcar_canfd_setrnc(gpriv, ch, num_rules);
+ rcar_canfd_set_rnc(gpriv, ch, num_rules);
if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs)
offset = RCANFD_GEN4_GAFL_OFFSET;
else if (gpriv->fdmode)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc()
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-12 4:04 ` Vincent Mailhol
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Mailhol @ 2025-06-12 4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Marc Kleine-Budde, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
On 12/06/2025 at 00:37, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Insert an underscore in the function's name, for consistency with other
> getter and setter helper functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 08/10] can: rcar_canfd: Share config code in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming()
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] can: rcar_canfd: Return early in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming() when not FD Geert Uytterhoeven
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
The configuration register format for nominal bit timings in CAN-FD mode
and the format for bit timings in CAN mode on CAN-FD controllers with
shared Classical CAN registers are the same.
Restructure the code to make this clear, also reducing kernel size by 80
bytes.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by,
- Rebase.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 25 +++++++------------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index c292694ae4d27ac4..9ee49ef57e4f9c8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1474,13 +1474,17 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
tseg1 = bt->prop_seg + bt->phase_seg1 - 1;
tseg2 = bt->phase_seg2 - 1;
- if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
- /* CAN FD only mode */
+ if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) || gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
cfg = (RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_NCFG_NBRP(brp) |
RCANFD_NCFG_NSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
+ } else {
+ cfg = (RCANFD_CFG_TSEG1(tseg1) | RCANFD_CFG_BRP(brp) |
+ RCANFD_CFG_SJW(sjw) | RCANFD_CFG_TSEG2(tseg2));
+ }
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
+ rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
+ if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
/* Data bit timing settings */
brp = dbt->brp - 1;
sjw = dbt->sjw - 1;
@@ -1491,21 +1495,6 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
- } else {
- /* Classical CAN only mode */
- if (gpriv->info->shared_can_regs) {
- cfg = (RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) |
- RCANFD_NCFG_NBRP(brp) |
- RCANFD_NCFG_NSJW(gpriv, sjw) |
- RCANFD_NCFG_NTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
- } else {
- cfg = (RCANFD_CFG_TSEG1(tseg1) |
- RCANFD_CFG_BRP(brp) |
- RCANFD_CFG_SJW(sjw) |
- RCANFD_CFG_TSEG2(tseg2));
- }
-
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
}
}
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 09/10] can: rcar_canfd: Return early in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming() when not FD
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] can: rcar_canfd: Share config code in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming() Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-13 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] " Marc Kleine-Budde
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
Return early after completing all setup for non-FD mode in
rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(), to prepare for the advent of more FD-only
setup.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by,
- Rebase.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 9ee49ef57e4f9c8e..3340ae75bbecdb5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -1484,18 +1484,19 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, RCANFD_CCFG(ch), cfg);
- if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) {
- /* Data bit timing settings */
- brp = dbt->brp - 1;
- sjw = dbt->sjw - 1;
- tseg1 = dbt->prop_seg + dbt->phase_seg1 - 1;
- tseg2 = dbt->phase_seg2 - 1;
+ if (!(priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD))
+ return;
- cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
- RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
+ /* Data bit timing settings */
+ brp = dbt->brp - 1;
+ sjw = dbt->sjw - 1;
+ tseg1 = dbt->prop_seg + dbt->phase_seg1 - 1;
+ tseg2 = dbt->phase_seg2 - 1;
- rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
- }
+ cfg = (RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG1(gpriv, tseg1) | RCANFD_DCFG_DBRP(brp) |
+ RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
+
+ rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
}
static int rcar_canfd_start(struct net_device *ndev)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 10/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] can: rcar_canfd: Return early in rcar_canfd_set_bittiming() when not FD Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-11 15:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-06-13 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] " Marc Kleine-Budde
10 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-11 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde, Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang
Cc: Kazuhiro Takagi, Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc,
Geert Uytterhoeven
The Renesas CAN-FD hardware block supports configuring Transceiver Delay
Compensation, and reading back the Transceiver Delay Compensation
Result, which is needed to support high transfer rates like 8 Mbps.
The Secondary Sample Point is either the measured delay plus the
configured offset, or just the configured offset.
Fix the existing RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO() macro for the intended use case
(writing instead of reading the field). Add register definition bits
for the Channel n CAN-FD Status Register.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by,
- Rebase,
- Replace function-like macro RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR() by bitmask
RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR and helper function rcar_canfd_get_tdcr(),
- Replace function-like macro RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCVF() by two bit
definitions,
- Drop debug print of tdc mode and tdco value.
---
drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
index 3340ae75bbecdb5b..1e559c0ff0389a5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/rcar/rcar_canfd.c
@@ -191,9 +191,19 @@
/* RSCFDnCFDCmFDCFG */
#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG_CLOE BIT(30)
#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDCFG_FDOE BIT(28)
+#define RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO GENMASK(23, 16)
#define RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCE BIT(9)
#define RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCOC BIT(8)
-#define RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO(x) (((x) & 0x7f) >> 16)
+
+/* RSCFDnCFDCmFDSTS */
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_SOC GENMASK(31, 24)
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_EOC GENMASK(23, 16)
+#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDSTS_TDCVF BIT(15)
+#define RCANFD_GEN4_FDSTS_PNSTS GENMASK(13, 12)
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_SOCO BIT(9)
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_EOCO BIT(8)
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCVF BIT(7)
+#define RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR GENMASK(7, 0)
/* RSCFDnCFDRFCCx */
#define RCANFD_RFCC_RFIM BIT(12)
@@ -520,6 +530,7 @@ struct rcar_canfd_shift_data {
struct rcar_canfd_hw_info {
const struct can_bittiming_const *nom_bittiming;
const struct can_bittiming_const *data_bittiming;
+ const struct can_tdc_const *tdc_const;
const struct rcar_canfd_regs *regs;
const struct rcar_canfd_shift_data *sh;
u8 rnc_field_width;
@@ -627,6 +638,25 @@ static const struct can_bittiming_const rcar_canfd_bittiming_const = {
.brp_inc = 1,
};
+/* CAN FD Transmission Delay Compensation constants */
+static const struct can_tdc_const rcar_canfd_gen3_tdc_const = {
+ .tdcv_min = 1,
+ .tdcv_max = 128,
+ .tdco_min = 1,
+ .tdco_max = 128,
+ .tdcf_min = 0, /* Filter window not supported */
+ .tdcf_max = 0,
+};
+
+static const struct can_tdc_const rcar_canfd_gen4_tdc_const = {
+ .tdcv_min = 1,
+ .tdcv_max = 256,
+ .tdco_min = 1,
+ .tdco_max = 256,
+ .tdcf_min = 0, /* Filter window not supported */
+ .tdcf_max = 0,
+};
+
static const struct rcar_canfd_regs rcar_gen3_regs = {
.rfcc = 0x00b8,
.cfcc = 0x0118,
@@ -672,6 +702,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_shift_data rcar_gen4_shift_data = {
static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rcar_gen3_hw_info = {
.nom_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen3_nom_bittiming_const,
.data_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen3_data_bittiming_const,
+ .tdc_const = &rcar_canfd_gen3_tdc_const,
.regs = &rcar_gen3_regs,
.sh = &rcar_gen3_shift_data,
.rnc_field_width = 8,
@@ -688,6 +719,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rcar_gen3_hw_info = {
static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rcar_gen4_hw_info = {
.nom_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_nom_bittiming_const,
.data_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_data_bittiming_const,
+ .tdc_const = &rcar_canfd_gen4_tdc_const,
.regs = &rcar_gen4_regs,
.sh = &rcar_gen4_shift_data,
.rnc_field_width = 16,
@@ -704,6 +736,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rcar_gen4_hw_info = {
static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rzg2l_hw_info = {
.nom_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen3_nom_bittiming_const,
.data_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen3_data_bittiming_const,
+ .tdc_const = &rcar_canfd_gen3_tdc_const,
.regs = &rcar_gen3_regs,
.sh = &rcar_gen3_shift_data,
.rnc_field_width = 8,
@@ -720,6 +753,7 @@ static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info rzg2l_hw_info = {
static const struct rcar_canfd_hw_info r9a09g047_hw_info = {
.nom_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_nom_bittiming_const,
.data_bittiming = &rcar_canfd_gen4_data_bittiming_const,
+ .tdc_const = &rcar_canfd_gen4_tdc_const,
.regs = &rcar_gen4_regs,
.sh = &rcar_gen4_shift_data,
.rnc_field_width = 16,
@@ -1460,12 +1494,15 @@ static irqreturn_t rcar_canfd_channel_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
{
+ u32 mask = RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO | RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCE | RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCOC;
struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv = priv->gpriv;
const struct can_bittiming *bt = &priv->can.bittiming;
const struct can_bittiming *dbt = &priv->can.fd.data_bittiming;
+ const struct can_tdc_const *tdc_const = priv->can.fd.tdc_const;
+ const struct can_tdc *tdc = &priv->can.fd.tdc;
+ u32 cfg, tdcmode = 0, tdco = 0;
u16 brp, sjw, tseg1, tseg2;
- u32 cfg;
u32 ch = priv->channel;
/* Nominal bit timing settings */
@@ -1497,6 +1534,20 @@ static void rcar_canfd_set_bittiming(struct net_device *ndev)
RCANFD_DCFG_DSJW(gpriv, sjw) | RCANFD_DCFG_DTSEG2(gpriv, tseg2));
rcar_canfd_write(priv->base, rcar_canfd_f_dcfg(gpriv, ch), cfg);
+
+ /* Transceiver Delay Compensation */
+ if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO) {
+ /* TDC enabled, measured + offset */
+ tdcmode = RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCE;
+ tdco = tdc->tdco - 1;
+ } else if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_MANUAL) {
+ /* TDC enabled, offset only */
+ tdcmode = RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCE | RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCOC;
+ tdco = min(tdc->tdcv + tdc->tdco, tdc_const->tdco_max) - 1;
+ }
+
+ rcar_canfd_update_bit(gpriv->base, rcar_canfd_f_cfdcfg(gpriv, ch), mask,
+ tdcmode | FIELD_PREP(RCANFD_FDCFG_TDCO, tdco));
}
static int rcar_canfd_start(struct net_device *ndev)
@@ -1807,6 +1858,29 @@ static int rcar_canfd_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
return num_pkts;
}
+static unsigned int rcar_canfd_get_tdcr(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv,
+ unsigned int ch)
+{
+ u32 sts = rcar_canfd_read(gpriv->base, rcar_canfd_f_cfdsts(gpriv, ch));
+ u32 tdcr = FIELD_GET(RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR, sts);
+
+ return tdcr & (gpriv->info->tdc_const->tdcv_max - 1);
+}
+
+static int rcar_canfd_get_auto_tdcv(const struct net_device *ndev, u32 *tdcv)
+{
+ struct rcar_canfd_channel *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
+ u32 tdco = priv->can.fd.tdc.tdco;
+ u32 tdcr;
+
+ /* Transceiver Delay Compensation Result */
+ tdcr = rcar_canfd_get_tdcr(priv->gpriv, priv->channel) + 1;
+
+ *tdcv = tdcr < tdco ? 0 : tdcr - tdco;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int rcar_canfd_do_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode)
{
int err;
@@ -1929,12 +2003,17 @@ static int rcar_canfd_channel_probe(struct rcar_canfd_global *gpriv, u32 ch,
if (gpriv->fdmode) {
priv->can.bittiming_const = gpriv->info->nom_bittiming;
priv->can.fd.data_bittiming_const = gpriv->info->data_bittiming;
+ priv->can.fd.tdc_const = gpriv->info->tdc_const;
/* Controller starts in CAN FD only mode */
err = can_set_static_ctrlmode(ndev, CAN_CTRLMODE_FD);
if (err)
goto fail;
- priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING;
+
+ priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING |
+ CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_AUTO |
+ CAN_CTRLMODE_TDC_MANUAL;
+ priv->can.fd.do_get_auto_tdcv = rcar_canfd_get_auto_tdcv;
} else {
/* Controller starts in Classical CAN only mode */
priv->can.bittiming_const = &rcar_canfd_bittiming_const;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation
2025-06-11 15:37 [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2025-06-11 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2025-06-13 7:40 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-06-13 12:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
10 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Marc Kleine-Budde @ 2025-06-13 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
Cc: Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang, Kazuhiro Takagi,
Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]
On 11.06.2025 17:37:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch series adds CAN-FD Transceiver Delay Compensation support to
> the R-Car CAN-FD driver, after the customary cleanups and refactorings.
>
There's no reference to footnote [1], as it refers to the v1, I'll add
it here.
> Changes compared to v1:
Changes compared to v1 [1]:
> - Dropped patch "can: rcar_canfd: Use ndev parameter in
> rcar_canfd_set_bittiming()",
> - New patch "[PATCH v2 02/10] can: rcar_canfd: Remove bittiming debug
> prints",
> - New patch "[PATCH v2 07/10] can: rcar_canfd: Rename
> rcar_canfd_setrnc() to rcar_canfd_set_rnc()",
> - Add Reviewed-by,
> - Replace function-like RCANFD_F_*() macros by rcar_canfd_f_*()
> inline functions,
> - Replace function-like macro RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR() by bitmask
> RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCR and helper function rcar_canfd_get_tdcr(),
> - Replace function-like macro RCANFD_FDSTS_TDCVF() by two bit
> definitions,
> - Drop debug print of tdc mode and tdco value.
>
> This has been tested on R-Car V4H (White Hawk), V4M (Gray Hawk Single),
> and E3 (Ebisu-4D[2]), using various data bit rates. Without proper TDC
> configuration, transmitting at 8 Mbps makes the CAN-FD controller enter
> BUS-OFF state. The TDCV value as measured by the CAN-FD controller is 4
> on all boards tested (base clock 40 MHz, i.e. 25 ns period), and ca. 90
> ns as measured by a logic analyzer on Gray Hawk Single.
>
> Note that the BSP (predating upstream TDC support), uses a much simpler
> method: for transfer rates >= 5 Mbps on R-Car Gen4, it enables TDC with
> a hardcoded (hardware) TDCO value of 2 (i.e. actual 3), which matches
> the behavior of this series at 8 Mbps.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> [1] "[PATCH 0/9] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation"
> https://lore.kernel.org/cover.1748863848.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Transceiver Delay Compensation
2025-06-13 7:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] " Marc Kleine-Budde
@ 2025-06-13 12:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2025-06-13 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Kleine-Budde
Cc: Vincent Mailhol, Biju Das, Wolfram Sang, Kazuhiro Takagi,
Duy Nguyen, linux-can, linux-renesas-soc
Hi Marc,
On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 at 13:42, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On 11.06.2025 17:37:29, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > This patch series adds CAN-FD Transceiver Delay Compensation support to
> > the R-Car CAN-FD driver, after the customary cleanups and refactorings.
>
> There's no reference to footnote [1], as it refers to the v1, I'll add
> it here.
Sorry, my mistake.
> > Changes compared to v1:
>
> Changes compared to v1 [1]:
That was my intention, thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread